期刊目錄列表 - 63卷(2018) - 【師大學報】63(1)三月刊

新舊批評觀念的交鋒:黃節與朱自清的樂府「清商三調」討論 作者:孫瑩瑩(香港大學中文學院講師)

卷期:63卷第1期
日期:2018年3月
頁碼:21-40
DOI:10.6210/JNTNU.2018.63(1).02

摘要:
1933年,黃節(1873~1935)與朱自清(1898~1948)討論漢樂府相和與清商聲調的關係的文章在《清華週刊》刊出。黃節因不同意梁啟超(1873~1929)《中國之美文及其歷史》將清商與相和調分類論之的觀點,因而撰文加以駁斥。同在清華大學中文系任教的朱自清對黃節的意見表示懷疑,援引樂府史料支持梁啟超的看法。最終,這場討論以黃節未正面回應朱自清關於樂府音樂性的提問告一段落,但關於相和與清商分類問題的討論延續至今。本文認為此次「清商三調」論爭是現代中國古典詩學研究觀念新舊之爭的表現。通過解讀黃節與朱自清的論辯依據及批評立場,可以剖析雙方批評方法與批評觀念的差異。這場「清商三調」討論反映了民國初年新舊批評觀念的交錯衝突,亦表現出古典詩學批評現代化進程的曲折特色。

關鍵詞:文學批評、朱自清(1898~1948)、清商三調、黃節(1873~1935)、樂府研究

《詳全文》

參考文獻:
  1. 明•胡應麟,《詩藪》(上海市:上海古籍出版社,1979)。
  2. 清•朱乾(編),興膳宏解說,《樂府正義》(京都市:同朋舍,1980)。
  3. 孔德,〈漢短簫鐃歌十八曲考釋〉,《東方雜誌》,23卷9期(1926),頁75-91。
  4. 心海,〈流芳遺臭:詩人黃晦聞〉,《禮拜六》,587期(1935),頁5。
  5. 王禮錫,〈中國詩史(陸侃如、馮沅君合著)〉,《讀書雜誌》,1卷6期(1931),頁1-2。
» 展開更多
中文APA引文格式孫瑩瑩(2018)。新舊批評觀念的交鋒:黃節與朱自清的樂府「清商三調」討論。師大學報,63(1),21-40。doi: 10.6210/JNTNU.2018.63(1).02
APA FormatSun, Y.-Y. (2018). “Qingshang sandiao”: Establishing the paradigm of literary criticism in modern China. Journal of National Taiwan Normal University, 63(1), 21-40. doi: 10.6210/JNTNU.2018.63(1).02

Journal directory listing - Volume 63(2018) - Journal of NTNU【63(1)】March

“Qingshang Sandiao”: Establishing the Paradigm of Literary Criticism in Modern China Author: Yingying Sun (School of Chinese, The University of Hong Kong Lecturer)

Vol.&No.:Vol.63, No.1
Date:March 2018
Pages:21-40
DOI:10.6210/JNTNU.2018.63(1).02

Abstract:
In 1933, a discussion related to “Qingshang Sandiao” (the three tones of Qingshang) was published in a university journal (Tsinghua University Weekly). Two famous scholars were involved in this debate, namely Huang Jie (1873-1935) and Zhu Ziqing (1898-1948). Their discussion on “Qingshang Sandiao” was fi rst analyzed by Liang Qichao (1873-1929) in an unpublished manuscript. Huang Jie did not agree with Liang’s viewpoint, and Zhu supported Liang’s argument by employing historical evidence. This discussion was completed by Huang’s reply, which did not answer Zhu’s core doubt on the division of “Xianghe Diao” and “Qingshang Diao.” Huang believed that studies on “Yuefu” poetry should concern its content and political impact on society. However, Zhu focused on the musicality and literary nature of “Yuefu” poetry. The current study explored the evidence, arguments, and infl uences of both parties in this discussion, concluding that the discussion in 1933 indicated a confl ict between various paradigms of literary criticism in modern China.

Keywords:literary Criticism, Zhu ziqing (1898-1948), Qingshang Sandiao, Huang Jie (1873-1935), Yuefu poetry studies