期刊目錄列表 - 63卷(2018) - 【教育科學研究期刊】63(4)十二月刊

當科學素養與閱讀素養相遇:高中學生科學新聞閱讀策略之實驗研究 作者:臺中市立豐原高級中學鄭可萱、國立臺中教育大學科學教育與應用學系李松濤

卷期:63卷第4期
日期:2018年12月
頁碼:157-192
DOI:10.6209/JORIES.201812_63(4).0006

摘要:
本研究的目的在於以「科學新聞提問模式」作為高中學生閱讀科學新聞的學習鷹架,藉由閱讀時的自我提問脈絡,在科學新聞文本中找到較為明確的架構與解讀的線索,並藉以判斷科學報導的目的、實驗設計、結果與證據間的邏輯性,以此提升高中學生對於科學新聞的判讀與理解。研究對象為中部某高中一年級兩班學生(實驗組32人,控制組38人);研究工具為自行發展之「科學新聞提問學習單」及「科學新聞理解測驗」,研究資料蒐集期間為四個月。共變數分析結果顯示,隨著實驗組學生對於自我提問模式的熟悉,三次測驗的素養表現出現成長趨勢;此外,分析結果也發現,本研究設計的「科學新聞提問模式」閱讀策略可提升實驗組學生的素養表現,包括科學素養中的「科學地解釋現象」及「科學地解釋數據與證據」等能力,以及閱讀素養中的「擷取與檢索」、「統整與解釋」、「省思與評鑑」等能力,但對於實驗設計題的學習幫助則不如預期。

關鍵詞:科學素養、科學新聞、閱讀素養

《詳全文》 檔名

參考文獻:
  1. 何宗穎、王敏男、謝佩妤、郭幸宜、趙大衛、黃台珠(2013)。大學普通生物學實驗課程應用探究鷹架自我評估策略對學生探究能力表現之影響。科學教育學刊,21(4),401-429。doi:10.6173/CJSE.2013.2104.02 【Ho, T.-Y., Wang, M. M.-N., Hsieh, P.-Y., Kuo, H.-Y., Chao, D., & Huang, T.-C. (2013). The influence of using scaffolding and self-assessment strategy on college students’ scientific-inquiry ability in a general biology curriculum. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 21(4), 401-429. doi:10.6173/CJSE.2013.2104.02】
  2. 何宗懿(2015)。閱讀者提問請教文本:試論PISA閱讀素養架構進階之道。教育研究與發展期刊,11(2),1-32。doi:10.3966/181665042015061102001 【Ho, T.-I. (2015). Readers raising questions to consult texts: Discussing the ways for upgrading PISA’s reading literacy. Journal of Educational Research and Development, 11(2), 1-32. doi:10.3966/181665042015061102001】
  3. 吳百興、張耀云、吳心楷(2010)。科學探究活動中的科學推理。科學教育研究與發展季刊,56,53-74。 【Wu, P.-H., Chang, Y.-Y., & Wu, H.-K. (2010). The role of science reasoning in inquiry learning. Research and Development in Science Education Qualterly, 56, 53-74.】
  4. 李松濤(2017)。大學生對於科學研究資訊的閱讀表現探究:以網路科學新聞為例。中華傳播學刊,12(32),91-128。doi:10.6195/cjcr.2017.32.03 【Lee, S.-T. (2017). A study of college students’ reading performance relating to scientific research information: An example of internet-based science news. Chinese Journal of Communication Research, 12(32), 91-128. doi: 10.6195/cjcr.2017.32.03】
  5. 佘曉清、林煥祥(主編)(2017)。PISA 2015臺灣學生的表現。新北市:心理。 【She, H.-C., & Lin, H.-S. (Eds.). (2017). Taiwan student performance on PISA 2015. New Taipei City, Taiwan: Psychological.】
» 展開更多
中文APA引文格式鄭可萱、李松濤(2018)。當科學素養與閱讀素養相遇:高中學生科學新聞閱讀策略之實驗研究。教育科學研究期刊,63(4),157-192。doi:10.6209/JORIES.201812_63(4).0006
APA FormatZheng, K.-H., & Lee, S.-T. (2018). When science literacy and reading literacy meet: experimental study of science news reading strategy for high school students. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 63(4), 157-192. doi:10.6209/JORIES.201812_63(4).0006

Journal directory listing - Volume 63(2018) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【63(4)】December

When Science Literacy and Reading Literacy Meet: Experimental Study of Science News Reading Strategy for High School Students Author: Ke-Hsuan Zheng (Taichung Municipal Feng Yuan Senior High School), Sung-Tao Lee (Department of Science Education and Application, National Taichung University of Education)

Vol.&No.:Vol. 63, No.4
Date:December 2018
Pages:157-192
DOI:10.6209/JORIES.201812_63(4).0006

Abstract:
This study proposed a scaffold of a science news questioning model for high school students when they read science news. It is hoped a clear framework and clues for news reading can be facilitated by the self-questioning strategy to judge the purpose, experiment designing, and logical relations between results and evidence. Seventy students (experimental group: 32 and control group: 38) from a senior high school located in Central Taiwan participated in this study. A learning sheet of science news questioning and a comprehension test for science news were developed. The study duration was two months. The analysis of covariance results indicated that the students in the experimental group exhibited steady literacy performance improvement in three tests. Moreover, this self-questioning teaching model is helpful for their scientific literacy performances (i.e., for scientifically explaining the phenomenon and scientifically interpreting data and evidence collected) and reading literacy performances (i.e., accessing, retrieving, integrating, interpreting, reflecting on, and evaluating information). However, this model was not very helpful for designing scientific inquiries.

Keywords:reading literacy, science news, scientific literacy