（專題）支援教育品質管理之整合式資訊系統建構與研究
作者:羅孟彥(國立高雄應用科技大學資訊工程系)
卷期：58卷第4期
日期：2013年12月
頁碼：69-101
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.2013.58(4).03
摘要：
面對外在全球化的高度競爭，與對內高等教育的快速擴張，高等教育品質保證成為近年來備受各方關注的議題。目前雖有相當多關於教育品質內涵、品質保證制度、品質評鑑指標等相關文獻，然而如何能夠有效落實相關機制的研究卻尚不多見。全面落實教育品質管理需要許多人、組織層級的配合，而這也是教育品質管理機制能否成功的重要因素。本研究旨在探討如何以教育品質為核心理念來設計一個整合式支援資訊系統，本研究以行動研究的方法，實際支援某幾所大專院校的教學卓越計畫之實施，嘗試以學理依據來引導實務工作的變革與改進，規劃與施行時間超過4年，並經由衡量教學卓越成效的問卷來驗證系統實施的成效。本研究主要的結論為：經由全面教育品質管理與成果導向理論的結合，可以發展出一個整合資訊系統的脈絡與架構，得以引領許多原本各自獨立的系統能夠整合，且有效地提升教學品質。由於近年來各大專院校均致力於建置相關資訊系統，本研究可以增進資訊系統工作者對於教育實務工作的理解，本研究的經驗與結果也可作為規劃相關資訊系統的參考，另外也提出許多創新議題值得教育研究者進一步探索。
關鍵詞：
高等教育、教育品質、教學卓越計畫、整合資訊系統
《詳全文》
參考文獻：
- 王如哲（2008）。高等教育品質保證制度－英、美、澳、芬蘭及丹麥五國之分析和啟示。高教評鑑，1（2），51-76。【Wang, R.-J. (2008). Systems of quality assurance in higher education–An analysis of five countries and their implications. Evaluation in Higher Education, 1(2), 51-76.】
- 王保進（1994）。我國高等教育表現指標現況之實證分析。教育與心理研究，17，61-98。【Wang, B.-J. (1994). An empirical view on performance indicators in higher education of Taiwan. Journal of Education and Psychology, 17, 61-98.】
- 宋曜廷、潘佩妤（2010）。混合研究在教育研究的應用。教育科學研究期刊，55（4），97-130。doi:10.3966/2073753X2010125504004【Sung, Y.-T., & Pan, P.-Y. (2010). Applications of mixed methods research in educational studies. Journal of Research in Educational Sciences, 55(4), 97-130. doi:10.3966/2073753X2010125504004】
- 吳清山（2007）。提升教育品質 強化教育競爭力。品質月刊，43（8），62-66。【Wu, C.-S. (2007). Promoting education quality for educational competitiveness. Quality Magazine, 43(8), 62-66.】
- 吳清山、黃旭鈞（1995）。提升教育品質的一股新動力－談全面品質管理及其在教育上的應用。教育資料與研究，2，74-83。【Wu, C.-S., & Huang, H.-C. (1995). New momentum for promoting educational quality–Application of total quality management on education. Educational Resources and Research, 2, 74-83.】
» 展開更多
- 王如哲（2008）。高等教育品質保證制度－英、美、澳、芬蘭及丹麥五國之分析和啟示。高教評鑑，1（2），51-76。【Wang, R.-J. (2008). Systems of quality assurance in higher education–An analysis of five countries and their implications. Evaluation in Higher Education, 1(2), 51-76.】
- 王保進（1994）。我國高等教育表現指標現況之實證分析。教育與心理研究，17，61-98。【Wang, B.-J. (1994). An empirical view on performance indicators in higher education of Taiwan. Journal of Education and Psychology, 17, 61-98.】
- 宋曜廷、潘佩妤（2010）。混合研究在教育研究的應用。教育科學研究期刊，55（4），97-130。doi:10.3966/2073753X2010125504004【Sung, Y.-T., & Pan, P.-Y. (2010). Applications of mixed methods research in educational studies. Journal of Research in Educational Sciences, 55(4), 97-130. doi:10.3966/2073753X2010125504004】
- 吳清山（2007）。提升教育品質 強化教育競爭力。品質月刊，43（8），62-66。【Wu, C.-S. (2007). Promoting education quality for educational competitiveness. Quality Magazine, 43(8), 62-66.】
- 吳清山、黃旭鈞（1995）。提升教育品質的一股新動力－談全面品質管理及其在教育上的應用。教育資料與研究，2，74-83。【Wu, C.-S., & Huang, H.-C. (1995). New momentum for promoting educational quality–Application of total quality management on education. Educational Resources and Research, 2, 74-83.】
- 李坤崇（2009a）。成果導向的課程發展模式。教育研究月刊，186，39-58。【Li, K.-C. (2009a). Outcome-based curriculum development model. Journal of Education Research, 186, 39-58.】
- 李坤崇（2009b）。大學課程地圖理念、繪製與類型。教育研究月刊，187，86-105。【Li, K.-C. (2009b). University curriculum mapping concept, construction, and classification. Journal of Education Research, 187, 86-105.】
- 楊國賜（2003）。提升大學教育品質，增進國際競爭力。教育資料與研究，54，75-86。【Yang, K.-S. (2003). Promoting educational quality of university, enhance competency of nations. Educational Resources and Research, 54, 75-86.】
- 楊瑩（2005）。高等教育的品質保證。臺灣教育，632，13-20。【Yang, Y. (2005). Higher education quality assurance. Taiwan Education Review, 632, 13-20.】
- 楊瑩（2011）。以學生學習成效為評量重點的歐盟高等教育品質保證政策。評鑑雙月刊，30，27-34。【Yang, Y. (2011). Quality assurance policies in higher education of the European Union based on students learning outcome. Evaluation Bimonthly, 30, 27-34.】
- 楊鎮華、蔣旭政（2011）。如何使用資訊科技強化我國大學教育投資效率。前瞻科技與管理，1（1），15-33。【Yang, J.-H., & Chiang, H.-C. (2011). How to use information technology to enhance the efficiency of investment in university education. Journal of Advanced Technology and Management, 1(1), 15-33.】
- 傅祖壇（2011）。臺灣高等教育院校之學校品質、經營效率與最適規模分析。教育科學研究期刊，56（3），181-213。doi:10.3966/2073753X2011095603007【Fu, T.-T. (2011). School quality, operational efficiency, and optimal size: An analysis of higher education institutions in Taiwan. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 56(3), 181-213. doi:10.3966/2073753X 2011095603007】
- 蘇錦麗（2009）。大學校院學生學習成果評估相關內涵分析。評鑑雙月刊，21，58-62。【Su, J.-L. (2009). Analysis on content of learning outcome for university students. Evaluation Bimonthly, 21, 58-62.】
- 羅孟彥、黃琪（2010，10月）。學習與生涯歷程檔案系統之建置與研究。論文發表於2010台灣網際網路研討會，臺南市。【Luo, M.-Y., & Huang, C. (2010, October). Implementation and study of an e-portfolio system for learning and career development. Paper presented at the meeting of the TANET 2010 Taiwan Academic Network Conference, Tainan, Taiwan.】
- Beattie, V., & Collins, B. (2000). Teaching quality assessment in accounting: The Scottish experience. Accounting Education, 9(1), 1-22. doi:10.1080/096392800413627
- Bok, D. (2006). Our underachieving colleges: A candid look at how much students learn and why they should be learning more. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Boyer, E. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
- Cheng, Y.-Y., Lyu, J., & Lin, Y.-C. (2004). Education improvement through ISO9000 implementation: Experiences in Taiwan. International Journal of Engineering Education, 20(1), 91-95.
- Ciampa, D. (1991). Total quality: A users’ guide for implementation. Reading, MA: Addison- Wesley.
- Danielson, C., & McGreal, T. L. (2005). Teacher evaluation to enhance professional practice. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
- Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the crisis. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Center for Advanced Engineering Study.
- Ewell, P. (2010). Twenty years of quality assurance in higher education: What’s happened and what’s different? Quality in Higher Education, 16(2), 173-175. doi:10.1080/13538322.2010. 485728
- Hampton, G. M. (1993). Gap analysis of college student satisfaction as a measure of professional service quality. Journal of Professional Services Marketing, 9(1), 115-128.
- Ishikawa, K. (1990). Introduction to quality control. Tokyo, Japan: Productivity Press.
- Kano, N. (1993). A perspective on quality activities in American firms. California Management Review, 35(3), 12-31. doi:10.2307/41166741
- Luo, M.-Y., & Lin, S.-W. (2013). From monolithic systems to a federated e-learning cloud system. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Cloud Engineering, 156-165. doi:10.1109/ IC2E.2013.39
- Mukhopadhyay, M. (2005). Total quality management in education. London, UK: Sage.
- Oakes, J. (1986). Educational indicators: A guide for policymakers. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Policy Research in Education.
- Omachonu, V. K., & Ross, J. E. (2004). Principles of total quality (3rd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
- Sallis, E. (2002). Total quality management in education. London, UK: Routledge.
- Shavelson, R. J., McDonnell, L., Oakes, J., Carey, N., & Picus, L. (1987). Indicator systems for monitoring mathematics and science education. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
- Spady, W. G. (1994). Outcome-based education: Critical issues and answers. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED380910)
- Storen, L. A., & Aamodt, P. O. (2010). The quality of higher education and employability of graduates. Quality in Higher Education, 16(3), 297-313. doi:10.1080/13538322.2010.506726
Journal directory listing - Volume 58 (2013) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【58(4)】December (Special Issue: Quality management and assurance in education)
(Special Issue) Design, Implementation and Study of an Integrated Information System for Educational Quality Management
Author: Mon-Yen Luo(Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Kaohsiung University of Applied Sciences)
Vol.&No.：Vol. 58, No. 4
Date：December 2013
Pages：69-101
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.2013.58(4).03
Abstract：
Under the severe competition of globalization and the rapid expansion of higher education institutions, educational quality has become an important research issue. Although the studies have been conducted extensively on the content of educational quality, mechanism design, and educational quality indicators, little attention has been paid to the deployment of educational quality management and support of information system. In this study, we discuss the design, implementation, enforcement, and initial results of an integrated information system designed around the concept and theories of educational quality. The proposed system has been deployed in a university for four years. Some conclusions of this study are explored. Based on the theory of educational quality and outcome-based education, we can design a framework to guide the design and integration of information systems related to teaching and learning. The initial results indicate that such a system can improve educational quality. This study can serve as a reference design for educational institutions that want to build information systems related to teaching, learning, and educational quality assurance.
Keywords：
higher education, education quality, teaching excellence program, integrated information system