（專題）素養導向之數學教材設計與發展
作者:國立臺灣師範大學數學系左台益、國立臺灣師範大學數學系李健恆
卷期：63卷第4期
日期：2018年12月
頁碼：29-58
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.201812_63(4).0002
摘要：
為培養學生能適應快速變遷的社會及面對未來挑戰，教學設計必須考慮相關的知識、技能、思維、態度等學習要素。而數學常展現於日常的活動、科技的發展、社會及經濟現象的解讀等生活及各種研究中，因此，「數學素養」一詞成為國民基本教育課程中的重要理念。然而，許多文獻都在探討數學素養的意涵及其目標，卻很少說明培養數學素養的教材設計。本研究從彙整現有文獻中的數學素養意涵，從而提出「知」識、應「用」、「觀」點與「學」習是數學素養的構成要素，而教材設計可從現實問題轉譯為數學問題，利用數學結果詮譯情境意義的學習迴圈，並配合APOS理論之起源分解說明數學知識的認知發展，發展以數學「知」識為核心，發展具內含及外顯特質的「用」、「觀」、「學」之素養導向教材。在此架構中，素養教材設計不限於同時包含迴圈中的所有元素，且「知」、「用」、「觀」、「學」是教材設計之方法而非必須依循的發展順序，教材設計者應考量學習者的認知及數學概念的發展，設計配合知識的應用、對數學的觀感、終身學習的思維及技能為導向的數學教材。本研究提供設計實例以說明教材設計的可能方向，並由此提出未來相關研究建議。
關鍵詞：APOS理論、素養構成要素、教材設計、數學素養
《詳全文》
參考文獻：
- 左台益（2012）。動態幾何系統的概念工具。中等教育，63（4），6-15。doi:10.6249/SE.2012.63.4.01 【Tso, T.-Y. (2012). The conceptual tool in dynamic geometry system. Secondary Education, 63(4), 6-15. doi:10.6249/SE.2012.63.4.01】
- 左台益、胡政德（2009）。準教師從真實情境中建構數學模式的認知因素分析與機制。當代教育研究季刊，17（4），61-101。doi:10.6151/CERQ.2009.1704.03 【Tso, T.-Y., & Hu, C.-T. (2009). Analyzing and understanding the cognitive factors and translation mechanisms of pre-service teachers in their processes of mathematical modeling. Contemporary Educational Research Quarterly, 17(4), 61-101. doi:10.6151/CERQ.2009.1704.03】
- 左台益、陳埩淑、林原宏、劉祥通、林素微、楊凱琳（2015）。提升臺灣K-12學生數學素養之研究。科技部專題研究計畫（MOST104-2511-S-003-005-MY3）。臺北市：國立臺灣師範大學數學系（所）。 【Tso, T.-Y., Chen, C.-S., Lin, Y.-H., Liu, S.-T., Lin S.-W., & Yang, K.-L. (2015). A study on enhancing mathematical literacy of K-12 students in Taiwan. Ministry of Science and Technology Research Project (MOST 104-2511-S-003-005-MY3). Taipei, Taiwan: Department of Mathematics, National Taiwan Normal University.】
- 余民寧、韓珮華（2009）。教學方式對數學學習興趣與數學成就之影響：以TIMSS 2003台灣資料為例。測驗學刊，56（1），19-48。doi:10.7108/PT.200903.0019 【Yu, M.-N., & Han, P.-H. (2009). The influence of teaching methods on the mathematics learning interests and achievement: The case of TIMSS 2003 Taiwan data. Psychological Testing, 56(1), 19-48. doi:10.7108/PT. 200903.0019】
- 吳冬友、楊玉坤（2005）。統計學（第四版）。臺北市：五南。 【Wu, D.-Y., & Yang, Y.-K. (2005). Statistics-principles and methods (4th ed.). Taipei, Taiwan: Wu-Nan Book.】
» 展開更多
- 左台益（2012）。動態幾何系統的概念工具。中等教育，63（4），6-15。doi:10.6249/SE.2012.63.4.01 【Tso, T.-Y. (2012). The conceptual tool in dynamic geometry system. Secondary Education, 63(4), 6-15. doi:10.6249/SE.2012.63.4.01】
- 左台益、胡政德（2009）。準教師從真實情境中建構數學模式的認知因素分析與機制。當代教育研究季刊，17（4），61-101。doi:10.6151/CERQ.2009.1704.03 【Tso, T.-Y., & Hu, C.-T. (2009). Analyzing and understanding the cognitive factors and translation mechanisms of pre-service teachers in their processes of mathematical modeling. Contemporary Educational Research Quarterly, 17(4), 61-101. doi:10.6151/CERQ.2009.1704.03】
- 左台益、陳埩淑、林原宏、劉祥通、林素微、楊凱琳（2015）。提升臺灣K-12學生數學素養之研究。科技部專題研究計畫（MOST104-2511-S-003-005-MY3）。臺北市：國立臺灣師範大學數學系（所）。 【Tso, T.-Y., Chen, C.-S., Lin, Y.-H., Liu, S.-T., Lin S.-W., & Yang, K.-L. (2015). A study on enhancing mathematical literacy of K-12 students in Taiwan. Ministry of Science and Technology Research Project (MOST 104-2511-S-003-005-MY3). Taipei, Taiwan: Department of Mathematics, National Taiwan Normal University.】
- 余民寧、韓珮華（2009）。教學方式對數學學習興趣與數學成就之影響：以TIMSS 2003台灣資料為例。測驗學刊，56（1），19-48。doi:10.7108/PT.200903.0019 【Yu, M.-N., & Han, P.-H. (2009). The influence of teaching methods on the mathematics learning interests and achievement: The case of TIMSS 2003 Taiwan data. Psychological Testing, 56(1), 19-48. doi:10.7108/PT. 200903.0019】
- 吳冬友、楊玉坤（2005）。統計學（第四版）。臺北市：五南。 【Wu, D.-Y., & Yang, Y.-K. (2005). Statistics-principles and methods (4th ed.). Taipei, Taiwan: Wu-Nan Book.】
- 李坤崇（2002）。國民中小學新舊課程銜接理念。取自http://teach.eje.edu.tw/9CC/context/basic.php 【Li, K.-C. (2002). The concept of linking the new and old curriculum in elementary and middle schools. Retrieved from http://teach.eje.edu.tw/9CC/context/basic.php】
- 林素微（2000）。數學科評量的新願景：談多元評量。研習資訊，17（3），31-42。 【Lin, S.-W. (2000). The new vision of mathematics assessment: Discussion of multiple assessments. Study Information, 17(3), 31-42.】
- 林福來、單維彰、李源順、鄭章華（2013）。十二年國民基本教育數學領域綱要內容之前導研究。國家教育研究院「十二年國民基本教育領域綱要內容前導研究」整合型研究之子計畫三（NAER-102-06-A-1-02-03-1-12）。新北市：國家教育研究院。 【Lin, F.-L., Shann, W.-C., Li, Y.-S., & Chang, C.-H. (2013). Pilot study report of mathematics curriculum guidelines of 12-year national basic education. The Integrated Research Subproject 3: “Pilot study report of mathematics curriculum guidelines of 12-year national basic education” by National Academy for Educational Research (NAER-102-06-A-1-02-03-1-12). New Taipei City, Taiwan: National Academy for Educational Research.】
- 洪誌陽、洪萬生（2010）。三角測量及其相關歷史。取自http://highscope.ch.ntu.edu.tw/wordpress/? p=16861 【Hong, Z.-Y., & Horng, W.-S. (2010). Trigonometric measurement and its history. Retrieved from http://highscope.ch.ntu.edu.tw/wordpress/?p=16861】
- 范信賢（2001）。「文本」：後現代思潮下對「教材」概念的省思。國教學報，13，171-185。 【Fan, H.-H. (2001). “Text”: Rethinking the concept of “material” in the postmodern. Journal of Elementary Education, 13, 171-185.】
- 國家教育研究院（2016）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要（國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校）：數學領域（草案）。取自http://www.naer.edu.tw/ezfiles/0/1000/attach/37/pta_10147_ 1655251_02807.pdf 【National Academy for Educational Research. (2016). 12-year national basic education curriculum guidelines (National elementary and junior high school and ordinary high school): Mathematics (draft). Retrieved from http://www.naer.edu.tw/ezfiles/0/1000/attach/37/pta_10147_1655251_02807.pdf】
- 張幼賢（主編）（2016）。國民中學數學（三版，第三冊，二上）。臺南市：翰林。 【Chang, Y.-H. (Ed.). (2016). Junior high school mathematics textbook (3rd ed., vol. 3, 2nd year 1st semester). Tainan, Taiwan: Han Lin.】
- 張毓仁、柯華葳、邱皓政、歐宗霖、溫福星（2011）。教師閱讀教學行為與學生閱讀態度和閱讀能力自我評價對於閱讀成就之跨層次影響：以PIRLS 2006為例。教育科學研究期刊，56（2），69-105。doi:10.3966/2073753X2011065602003 【Chang, Y.-J., Ko, H.-W., Chiou, H.-J., Ou, T.-L., & Wen, F.-H. (2011). The cross-level effects of teachers’ reading instruction, students’ reading attitude, and self-assessment in reading proficiency on students’ reading achievement: A multilevel study of PIRLS 2006. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 56(2), 69-105. doi:10.3966/2073753X2011065602003】
- 教育部（2013）。教育部提升國民素養專案計畫報告書。臺北市：教育部提升國民素養專案辦公室。 【Ministry of Education. (2013). Project report of Ministry of Education for improving citizen literacy. Taipei, Taiwan: Project Office of Improving Citizen Literacy, Ministry of Education.】
- 教育部（2014）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。臺北市：作者。 【Ministry of Education. (2014). 12-year national basic education curriculum guidelines. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.】
- 彭開琼、張佳雯、李瑞生（2017）。OECD國家與臺灣之教育績效比較：以PISA科學素養為例。教育科學研究期刊，62（4），145-179。doi:10.6209/JORIES.2017.62(4).06 【Peng, K.-C., Chang, C.-W., & Li, J.-S. (2017). High school students’ science literacy and educational performance: A comparison between Taiwan and OECD countries. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 62(4), 145-179. doi:10.6209/JORIES.2017.62(4).06】
- 黃幸美（2005）。生活情境融入數學課程的問題探討。教育研究月刊，133，117-123。 【Huang, H.-M. (2005). Discussion on the problems of integrating life situation into mathematics course. Journal of Education Research, 133, 117-123.】
- 劉玉玲、沈淑芬（2015）。數學自我概念、數學學習策略、數學學業情緒與數學學業成就之研究─自我提升模式觀點。教育心理學報，46（4），491-516。doi:10.6251/BEP.20140716 【Liu, Y.-L., & Shen, S.-F. (2015). Relations among mathematics self-concept, mathematics learning strategy, mathematics emotion, and mathematics academic achievement: The self-enhancement model. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 46(4), 491-516. doi:10.6251/BEP.20140716】
- 蔡清田（2011）。課程改革中的「素養」。幼兒教保研究期刊，7，1-13。 【Tsai, C.-T. (2011). Competence in curriculum reform. Journal of Early Childhood Education & Care, 7, 1-13.】
- Arnon, I., Cottrill, J., Dubinsky, E., Oktaç, A., Roa Fuentes, S., Trigueros, M., & Weller, K. (2014). APOS theory: A framework for research and curriculum development in mathematics education. New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-7966-6
- Ayres, P. (2006). Impact of reducing intrinsic cognitive load on learning in a mathematical domain. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(3), 287-298. doi:10.1002/acp.1245
- Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Reform by the book: What is − or might be − the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform? Educational Researcher, 25(9), 6-8, 14. doi:10.3102/0013189X025009006
- Barwell, R. (2004). What is numeracy? For the Learning of Mathematics, 24(1), 20-22.
- Borovik, A. V., & Gardiner, T. (2006, July). Mathematical abilities and mathematical skills. Paper presented at the World Federation of National Mathematics Competitions Conference, Cambridge, UK.
- Chiou, J.-Y., & Tso, T.-Y. (2013). Design and experiment on a touchscreen learning software for factoring quadratic trinomials. In M. Inprasitha (Ed.), Proceedings of the 6th East Asia Regional Conference on Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, p. 216). Phuket, Thailand: International Commission on Mathematical Instruction.
- D’Ambrosio, U. (1999). Literacy, matheracy, and technocracy: A trivium for today. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1(2), 131-153. doi:10.1207/s15327833mtl0102_3
- de Lange, J. (2006). Mathematical literacy for living from OECD-PISA perspective. Tsukuba Journal of Educational Study in Mathematics, 25(1), 13-35.
- delMas, R. C. (2002). Statistical literacy, reasoning, and learning: A commentary. Journal of Statistics Education, 10(3). Retrieved from http://www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v10n3/delmas_ discussion.html
- Dubinsky, E., & McDonald, M. A. (2001). APOS: A constructivist theory of learning in undergraduate mathematics education research. In D. Holton, M. Artigue, U. Kirchgräber, J. Hillel, M. Niss, & A. Schoenfeld (Eds.), The teaching and learning of mathematics at university level: An ICMI study (Vol. 7, pp. 275-282). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic. doi:10. 1007/0-306-47231-7_25
- Duval, R. (2006). A cognitive analysis of problems of comprehension in a learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(1-2), 103-131. doi:10.1007/s10649-006-0400-z
- Fischbein, E. (1993). The theory of figural concepts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24(2), 139-162. doi:10.1007/BF01273689
- Gal, I. (2004). Statistical literacy: Meanings, components, responsibilities. In D. Ben-Zvi & J. Garfield (Eds.), The challenge of developing statistical literacy, reasoning and thinking (pp. 47-78). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer. doi:10.1007/1-4020-2278-6_3
- Geiger, V., Goos, M., & Forgasz, H. (2015). A rich interpretation of numeracy for the 21st century: A survey of the state of the field. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 47(4), 531-548. doi:10.1007/ s11858-015-0708-1
- Goos, M., Dole, S., & Geiger, V. (2012). Numeracy: Across the curriculum. The Australian Mathematics Teacher, 68(1), 3-7.
- Iowa Department of Education. (2010). Iowa core mathematics. Retrieved from https://www. educateiowa.gov/sites/files/ed/documents/K-12_Mathematics_0.pdf
- Jablonka, E. (2003). Mathematical literacy. In A. J. Bishop, M. A. Clement, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), Second international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 75-102). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic. doi:10.1007/978-94-010-0273-8_4
- Kaiser, G., & Willander, T. (2005). Development of mathematical literacy: Results of an empirical study. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications, 24(2-3), 48-60. doi:10.1093/teamat/hri016
- Karsenty, R. (2014). Mathematical ability. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 372-375). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4978- 8_94
- Knoblauch, C. H. (1990). Literacy and the politics of education. In A. A. Lunsford, H. Moglen, & J. Slevin (Eds.), The right to literacy (pp. 74-80). New York, NY: Modern Language Association of America.
- Maharaj, A. (2013). An APOS analysis of natural science students’ understanding of derivatives. South African Journal of Education, 33(1), 1-19. doi:10.15700/saje.v33n1a458
- Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. (2017). 2017 mathematics curriculum framework: Grades pre-kindergarten to 12. Malden, MA: Author.
- Metsisto, D. (2005). Reading in the mathematics classroom. In J. M. Kenney, E. Hancewicz, L. Heuer, D. Metsisto, & C. L. Tuttle (Eds.), Literacy strategies for improving mathematics instruction (pp. 9-23). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
- Ministry of Education. (2012). Mathematics syllabus: Secondary one to four express & normal (academic) course. Retrieved from https://www.moe.gov.sg/docs/default-source/document/ education/syllabuses/sciences/files/mathematics-syllabus-sec-1-to-4-express-n(a)-course.pdf
- Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., & Foy, P. (2008). TIMSS 2007 international mathematics report: Findings from IEA’s trends in international mathematics and science study at the fourth and eighth grades. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.
- National Research Council. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. doi:10.17226/9822
- Niss, M. (2003). Mathematical competencies and the learning of mathematics: The Danish KOM project. In A. Gagatsis & S. Papastavridis (Eds.), 3rd mediterranean conference on mathematical education (pp. 115-124). Athens, Greece: Hellenic Mathematical Society.
- Niss, M. (2015). Mathematical competencies and PISA. In K. Stacey & R. Turner (Eds.), Assessing mathematical literacy: The PISA experience (pp. 35-55). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10121-7_2
- Niss, M., Blum, W., & Galbraith, P. (2007). Introduction. In W. Blum, P. L. Galbraith, H. W. Henn, & M. Niss (Eds.), Modelling and applications in mathematics education: The 14th ICMI study (pp. 3-32). New York, NY: Springer.
- Niss, M., Bruder, R., Plannas, N., Turner, R., & Villa-Ochoa, J. A. (2016). Survey team on: Conceptualisation of the role of competencies, knowing and knowledge in mathematics education research. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 48(5), 611-632. doi:10.1007/s11858-016- 0799-3
- Niss, M., & Højgaard, T. (Eds.). (2011). Competencies and mathematical learning: Ideas and inspiration for the development of mathematics teaching and learning in Denmark. Roskilde, Denmark: Roskilde University.
- Nunes, T., Schliemann, A. D., & Carraher, D. W. (1993). Street mathematics and school mathematics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
- Ojose, B. (2011). Mathematics literacy: Are we able to put the mathematics we learn into everyday use? Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(1), 89-100.
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2012). Literacy, numeracy and problem solving in technology-rich environments: Framework for the OECD survey of adult skills. Paris, France: Author. doi:10.1787/9789264128859-en
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2016). PISA 2015 assessment and analytical framework: Science, reading, mathematics, and financial literacy. Paris, France: Author. doi:10.1787/9789264255425-en
- Papert, S. (1993). Obsolete skill set: The 3 Rs. Wired Magazine. Retrieved from https://www.wired. com/1993/02/1-2-papert/
- Parraguez, M., & Oktaç, A. (2010). Construction of the vector space concept from the viewpoint of APOS theory. Linear Algebra and Its Applications, 432(8), 2112-2124. doi:10.1016/j.laa.2009. 06.034
- Pugalee, D. K. (2004). A comparison of verbal and written descriptions of students’ problem solving processes. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 55(1-3), 27-47. doi:10.1023/B:EDUC.00000 17666.11367.c7
- Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22(1), 1-36. doi:10.1007/BF00302715
- Stacey, K., & Turner, R. (2015). The evolution and key concepts of the PISA mathematics frameworks. In K. Stacey & R. Turner (Eds.), Assessing mathematical literacy: The PISA experience (pp. 5-33). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10121-7_1
- Stahl, G., & The VMT Project Team. (2013). Dynamic-geometry activities with GeoGebra for virtual math teams. Retrieved from http://gerrystahl.net/elibrary/topics/activities.pdf
- Steen, L. A. (2001). The case for quantitative literacy. In L. A. Steen (Ed.), Mathematics and democracy: The case for quantitative literacy (pp. 1-22). Princeton, NJ: National Council on Education and the Disciplines.
- Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257-285. doi:10.1016/0364-0213(88)90023-7
- Turner, R. (2012, July). Mathematical literacy: Are we there yet? Paper presented at ICME-12, Topic Study Group 6: Mathematics literacy, Seoul, Korea.
- Turner, R., Blum, W., & Niss, M. (2015). Using competencies to explain mathematical item demand: A work in progress. In K. Stacey & R. Turner (Eds.), Assessing mathematical literacy: The PISA experience (pp. 85-115). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10121-7_4
- van den Akker, J. (2003). Curriculum perspectives: An introduction. In J. van den Akker, W. Kuiper, & U. Hameyer (Eds.), Curriculum landscapes and trends (pp. 1-10). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-1205-7_1
- Voskoglou, M. (2007). Formalism and intuition in mathematics: The role of the problem. Quaderni di Ricerca in Didattica, 17, 113-120.
- Weinstein, C. E. (1996). Learning how to learn: An essential skill for the 21st century. The Educational Record, 77(4), 49-52.
- Weller, K., Arnon, I., & Dubinsky, E. (2009). Preservice teachers’ understanding of the relation between a fraction or integer and its decimal expansion. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 9(1), 5-28. doi:10.1080/14926150902817381
- Yore, L. D., Pimm, D., & Tuan, H.-L. (2007). The literacy component of mathematical and scientific literacy. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(4), 559-589. doi:10. 1007/s10763-007-9089-4
Journal directory listing - Volume 63 (2018) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【63(4)】December (Special Issue: The Concepts and Practices for Achieving Literacy)
(Special Issue) Design and Development of Mathematical Literacy-Oriented Subject Materials
Author: Tai-Yih Tso (Department of Mathematics, National Taiwan Normal University), Kin Hang Lei (Department of Mathematics, National Taiwan Normal University)
Vol.&No.：Vol. 63, No.4
Date：December 2018
Pages：29-58
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.201812_63(4).0002
Abstract：
To help students’ adapt in a rapidly changing society, subject materials should incorporate learning components that feature knowledge, skills, thinking, and attitudes. Mathematics is commonly used in daily life, and it is vital for technological development and explaining economic phenomena. The term “mathematical literacy” is regarded as the main idea behind compulsory education in Taiwan. However, studies have often explored the objectives and implications of the mathematics curriculum rather than the design of subject materials for mathematical literacy. In this paper, based on a review of the literature, we propose that knowledge, application, disposition, and learning are the four components of mathematical literacy. Mathematical literacy-oriented subject materials can be designed based on a learning loop, which first translates real-life problems into mathematical problems and then uses the mathematical results to explain the context. This learning loop framework illustrates cognitive development of knowledge based on the genetic decomposition of APOS theory. The framework can be used to develop literacy-oriented mathematical subject materials with knowledge at the center, incorporating application, disposition, and learning and possessing implicit and explicit features. When designing teaching materials, some components can be excluded. The components of knowledge, application, disposition, and learning serve as the approach to teaching design rather than the sequence of cognitive development. The designers of subject materials should consider the development of both learners’ cognition and understanding of mathematical concepts. Moreover, the skills of knowledge application, mathematical perspective, and lifelong learning should be included in subject materials. Herein, several examples of possible directions for the design of subject materials are proposed, alongside suggestions for further investigations.
Keywords：APOS theory, components of literacy, design of subject materials, mathematical literacy