期刊目錄列表 - 63卷(2018) - 【教育科學研究期刊】63(4)十二月刊

素養導向之數學教材設計與發展 作者:國立臺灣師範大學數學系左台益、國立臺灣師範大學數學系李健恆

卷期:63卷第4期
日期:2018年12月
頁碼:29-58
DOI:10.6209/JORIES.201812_63(4).0002

摘要:
為培養學生能適應快速變遷的社會及面對未來挑戰,教學設計必須考慮相關的知識、技能、思維、態度等學習要素。而數學常展現於日常的活動、科技的發展、社會及經濟現象的解讀等生活及各種研究中,因此,「數學素養」一詞成為國民基本教育課程中的重要理念。然而,許多文獻都在探討數學素養的意涵及其目標,卻很少說明培養數學素養的教材設計。本研究從彙整現有文獻中的數學素養意涵,從而提出「知」識、應「用」、「觀」點與「學」習是數學素養的構成要素,而教材設計可從現實問題轉譯為數學問題,利用數學結果詮譯情境意義的學習迴圈,並配合APOS理論之起源分解說明數學知識的認知發展,發展以數學「知」識為核心,發展具內含及外顯特質的「用」、「觀」、「學」之素養導向教材。在此架構中,素養教材設計不限於同時包含迴圈中的所有元素,且「知」、「用」、「觀」、「學」是教材設計之方法而非必須依循的發展順序,教材設計者應考量學習者的認知及數學概念的發展,設計配合知識的應用、對數學的觀感、終身學習的思維及技能為導向的數學教材。本研究提供設計實例以說明教材設計的可能方向,並由此提出未來相關研究建議。

關鍵詞:APOS理論、素養構成要素、教材設計、數學素養

《詳全文》 檔名

參考文獻:
  1. 左台益(2012)。動態幾何系統的概念工具。中等教育,63(4),6-15。doi:10.6249/SE.2012.63.4.01 【Tso, T.-Y. (2012). The conceptual tool in dynamic geometry system. Secondary Education, 63(4), 6-15. doi:10.6249/SE.2012.63.4.01】
  2. 左台益、胡政德(2009)。準教師從真實情境中建構數學模式的認知因素分析與機制。當代教育研究季刊,17(4),61-101。doi:10.6151/CERQ.2009.1704.03 【Tso, T.-Y., & Hu, C.-T. (2009). Analyzing and understanding the cognitive factors and translation mechanisms of pre-service teachers in their processes of mathematical modeling. Contemporary Educational Research Quarterly, 17(4), 61-101. doi:10.6151/CERQ.2009.1704.03】
  3. 左台益、陳埩淑、林原宏、劉祥通、林素微、楊凱琳(2015)。提升臺灣K-12學生數學素養之研究。科技部專題研究計畫(MOST104-2511-S-003-005-MY3)。臺北市:國立臺灣師範大學數學系(所)。 【Tso, T.-Y., Chen, C.-S., Lin, Y.-H., Liu, S.-T., Lin S.-W., & Yang, K.-L. (2015). A study on enhancing mathematical literacy of K-12 students in Taiwan. Ministry of Science and Technology Research Project (MOST 104-2511-S-003-005-MY3). Taipei, Taiwan: Department of Mathematics, National Taiwan Normal University.】
  4. 余民寧、韓珮華(2009)。教學方式對數學學習興趣與數學成就之影響:以TIMSS 2003台灣資料為例。測驗學刊,56(1),19-48。doi:10.7108/PT.200903.0019 【Yu, M.-N., & Han, P.-H. (2009). The influence of teaching methods on the mathematics learning interests and achievement: The case of TIMSS 2003 Taiwan data. Psychological Testing, 56(1), 19-48. doi:10.7108/PT. 200903.0019】
  5. 吳冬友、楊玉坤(2005)。統計學(第四版)。臺北市:五南。 【Wu, D.-Y., & Yang, Y.-K. (2005). Statistics-principles and methods (4th ed.). Taipei, Taiwan: Wu-Nan Book.】
» 展開更多
中文APA引文格式左台益、李健恆(2018)。素養導向之數學教材設計與發展。教育科學研究期刊,63(4),29-58。doi: 10.6209/JORIES.201812_63(4).0002
APA FormatTso, T.-Y. & Lei, K.-H. (2018). Design and development of mathematical literacy-oriented subject materials. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 63(4), 29-48. doi: 10.6209/JORIES.201812_63(4).0002

Journal directory listing - Volume 63(2018) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【63(4)】December

Design and Development of Mathematical Literacy-Oriented Subject Materials Author: Tai-Yih Tso (Department of Mathematics, National Taiwan Normal University), Kin Hang Lei (Department of Mathematics, National Taiwan Normal University)

Vol.&No.:Vol. 63, No.4
Date:December 2018
Pages:29-58
DOI:10.6209/JORIES.201812_63(4).0002

Abstract:
To help students’ adapt in a rapidly changing society, subject materials should incorporate learning components that feature knowledge, skills, thinking, and attitudes. Mathematics is commonly used in daily life, and it is vital for technological development and explaining economic phenomena. The term “mathematical literacy” is regarded as the main idea behind compulsory education in Taiwan. However, studies have often explored the objectives and implications of the mathematics curriculum rather than the design of subject materials for mathematical literacy. In this paper, based on a review of the literature, we propose that knowledge, application, disposition, and learning are the four components of mathematical literacy. Mathematical literacy-oriented subject materials can be designed based on a learning loop, which first translates real-life problems into mathematical problems and then uses the mathematical results to explain the context. This learning loop framework illustrates cognitive development of knowledge based on the genetic decomposition of APOS theory. The framework can be used to develop literacy-oriented mathematical subject materials with knowledge at the center, incorporating application, disposition, and learning and possessing implicit and explicit features. When designing teaching materials, some components can be excluded. The components of knowledge, application, disposition, and learning serve as the approach to teaching design rather than the sequence of cognitive development. The designers of subject materials should consider the development of both learners’ cognition and understanding of mathematical concepts. Moreover, the skills of knowledge application, mathematical perspective, and lifelong learning should be included in subject materials. Herein, several examples of possible directions for the design of subject materials are proposed, alongside suggestions for further investigations.

Keywords:APOS theory, components of literacy, design of subject materials, mathematical literacy