期刊目錄列表 - 64卷(2019) - 【教育科學研究期刊】64(2)六月刊

師資養成公費制度之歷史探究 作者:國立臺灣師範大學師資培育學院黃嘉莉

卷期:64卷第2期
日期:2019年6月
頁碼:99-129
DOI:10.6209/JORIES.201906_64(2).0004

摘要:
本研究以1994年《師資培育法》為準,區分為國家以公費培育整體師資的「師範教育公費制度」,以及公費培育部分師資的「師資培育公費制度」,探究公費制度發展之設計目的、演進及其限制。經過歷史探究後,歸納之結論如下:一、公費制度設計目的從養成國家教師再到均衡區域師資,其功能包括吸引優秀人才穩定教師素質與促進社會流動;二、隨著社會環境變遷,師資培育公費制度包括公費待遇、服務義務、賠償公費等規定,與師範教育公費制度的原先設計差異不大;三、師範教育公費制度的舊問題延續至師資培育公費制度,包括公費制度未因師資培育模式不同而免其存在受到質疑、培養教師專業知能與態度功能有限及公費制度吸引優秀人才有限,使其新制度是否能解決均衡區域師資的目的,仍有待檢驗。

更正專區:
第108頁下方 
「2016 年制服費每人每年 8,000 元」之「8,000元」改為「2,000元」。
目前師資培育公費生受領公費仍依行政院台(84)忠授 5 字第 07900 號核定「師資培育公費生公費待遇項目及標準表」之規定。

關鍵詞:公費制度、師資培育公費制度、師範教育公費制度

《詳全文》 檔名

參考文獻:
  1. 大學考試入學分發委員會(無日期)。歷年資料下載專區。取自http://www2.uac.edu.tw/ downloads.htm【University Entrance Examination Admissions Distribution Committee. (n.d.). Historical data download area. Retrieved from http://www2.uac.edu.tw/downloads.htm】
  2. 中華民國大學院(1928)。全國教育會議報告。南京市:文海。【United Colleges of Republic of China. (1928). National education conference report. Nanjing, China: Wenhai.】
  3. 毛連塭、林永喜、張德銳、但昭偉、楊龍立、張芬芬(1994)。我國師範教育發展現況與評估之研究。臺北市:國立教育資料館。【Mao, L.-W., Lin, Y.-X., Chang, D.-R., Dan, J.-W., Yang, L.-L., & Chang, F.-F. (1994). Research on the current situation and evaluation of the development of teacher education in China. Taipei, Taiwan: National Institute of Educational Resources and Research.】
  4. 王文科(1994)。如何實施公自費併行制並維持師範校院學生入學的素質?載於國立教育資料館(主編),開創師資培育新局:談師範教育的危機與轉機(pp. 35-53)。臺北市:編者。【Wang, W.-K. (1994). How to implement the parallel system of government-funded and self-funded maintain the quality of students entering the normal colleges. In National Institute of Educational Resources and Research (Ed.), Creating a new start for teacher education: Talking about the crisis and transferring of teacher education (pp. 35-53). Taipei, Taiwan: Editor.】
  5. 王家通、吳裕益(1984)。師大與師院教育功能之調查研究。教育學刊,5,95-131。【Wang, C.-D., & Wu, Y.-Y. (1984). Research on the educational function of normal universities and teachers college. Educational Review, 5, 95-131.】
» 展開更多
中文APA引文格式黃嘉莉(2019)。師資養成公費制度之歷史探究。教育科學研究期刊,64(2),99-129。
doi: 10.6209/JORIES.201906_64(2).0004
APA FormatHuang, J.-L. (2019). A Historical Approach on the Government-Funded System for Teacher Preparation. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 64(2), 99-129. doi: 10.6209/JORIES.201906_64(2).0004

Journal directory listing - Volume 64 (2019) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【64(2)】June

A Historical Approach on the Government-Funded System for Teacher Preparation Author: Jia-Li Huang(College of Teacher Education, National Taiwan Normal University)

Vol.&No.:Vol. 64, No.2
Date:June 2019
Pages:99-129
DOI:10.6209/JORIES.201906_64(2).0004

Abstract:
This study used Taiwan’s Teacher Education Act of 1994 as a cut-point for distinguishing normal education (fully funded) and teacher education (partially funded) government-funded systems, examining the design concept and limitation of government-funded systems. This study’s findings of a historical approach analysis are: (1) The objective of developing the government-funded systems is to prepare national teachers during normal education stage and strive for regional equity in the context of teacher education openness; the function of government-funded is to attract talents and promote social mobility. (2) The treatment, obligation, and compensation of government-funded of teacher education were little difference in time between normal education and teacher education with social change. (3) Limitations on the design of the government-funded system during normal education to current in diversity teacher education are the existence of government-funded system is questioned, the limitation to prepare perspective teachers’ professional knowledge and competence, and the limitation of attraction to talent. The goal of new institution to equalize the teacher quality between different regional is still be reviewed in the future. As a result, the paper offers some suggestions that focus on the limits of government-funded teacher education through perspectives after historical analysis to be as reference for revising relative institution.

Keywords:government-funded system, government-funded system of normal education, government-funded system of teacher education