期刊目錄列表 - 66卷(2021) - 【教育科學研究期刊】66(3)九月刊

創造思考教學方案對高職生創造思考能力之效果與團體歷程分析(英文稿) 作者:國立臺灣科技大學數位學習與教育研究所陳秀玲、國立臺灣科技大學數位學習與教育研究所黃博聖、國立臺灣科技大學數位學習與教育研究所蘇筑筠

卷期:66卷第3期
日期:2021年9月
頁碼:279-303
DOI:https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202109_66(3).0009

摘要:
    教導學生如何創意思考是國家持續發展與繁榮的重要關鍵。然而,目前普遍缺乏如何有效應用創意思考教學策略之討論。本研究主要目的在設計9週的創造力教學方案,並檢驗對於高職資訊科學生之創造思考能力的影響。採用準實驗研究之不等組設計,共85位高職生參與,實驗組為41人、控制組為44人。以新編創造思考測驗、Torrance圖形創造思考測驗之表現,分別作為創造力教學方案之前、後測,進行共變數分析。同時,蒐集教師個別訪談、課室觀察,以及學生焦點團體訪談與個別訪談等質性資料,來分析創造思考教學對高職生創意氛圍之影響。量化研究結果指出,實驗組於創造思考能力之流暢性、變通性、獨創性及精進性,皆顯著高於控制組。根據質性資料結果發現,實驗組在課程特性、團體動力、限制情境等主題上,皆有較佳的創意發想效果,此意味著本研究採用之創意思考教學策略,可有效提升高職生之創造思考能力,建議未來可整合至資訊科教育中。

關鍵詞:創造思考能力、創造思考教學、擴散性思考、歷程分析、高級職業學校

《詳全文》 檔名

參考文獻:
  1. Alkuş, S., & Olgan, R. (2014). Pre-service and in-service preschool teachers’ views regarding creativity in early childhood education. Early Child Development and Care, 184(12), 1902-1919. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2014.893236
  2. Baer, J. M. (1988). Long-term effects of creativity training with middle school students. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 8(2), 183-193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431688082006
  3. Baer, J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2008). Gender differences in creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 42(2), 75-105. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2008.tb01289.x
  4. Basadur, M. (1995). Optimal ideation-evaluation ratios. Creativity Research Journal, 8(1), 63-75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj0801_5
  5. Benjelloun, H. (2009). An empirical investigation of the use of humor in university classrooms. Education, Business and Society: Contemporary Middle Eastern Issues, 2(4), 312-322. https://doi.org/10.1108/17537980911001134
» 展開更多
中文APA引文格式陳秀玲、黃博聖、蘇筑筠(2021)。創造思考教學方案對高職生創造思考能力之效果與團體歷程分析。教育科學研究期刊,66(3),279-303。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202109_66(3).0009
APA FormatChen, H.-L., Huang, P.-S., & Su, C.-Y. (2021). Designing a vocational high school instructional program for enhancing creativity: Effects on creative thinking and group process analysis. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 66(3), 279-303. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202109_66(3).0009

Journal directory listing - Volume 66(2021) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【66(3)】September

Designing a Vocational High School Instructional Program for Enhancing Creativity: Effects on Creative Thinking and Group Process Analysis Author: Hsiu-Ling Chen (Graduate Institute of Digital Learning and Education, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology), Po-Sheng Huang (Graduate Institute of Digital Learning and Education, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology), Chu-Yun Su (Graduate Institute of Digital Learning and Education, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology)

Vol.&No.:Vol. 66, No. 3
Date:September 2021
Pages:279-303
DOI:https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202109_66(3).0009

Abstract:
    Teaching students the ability to think creatively can improve a country’s continuity and prosperity. However how strategies for teaching creative thinking can be efficiently applied remains unclear. This study examined the effect of a 9-week creativity curriculum on the creative thinking ability of students in an engineering program at a vocational high school. A nonequivalent, quasi-experimental design was employed. A total of 85 students were assigned to an experimental group of 41 or a control group of 44. The students in the experimental group scored significantly higher in all aspects of creative thinking ability, namely, fluency, flexibility, originality, and elaboration. The creative thinking curriculum yielded positive results; the emergent themes in the creative process included: (1) curriculum characteristics, (2) group dynamics, and (3) constraining conditions. The results imply that this 9-week creativity curriculum is efficient and can be incorporated into future research on engineering education or creative thinking.

Keywords:creative thinking ability, creative thinking instruction, divergent thinking, process analysis, vocational high school