Search by article title, author,
keywords, and DOI

Call for papers for the special issue “Prevention and Treatment of Addictive Behaviors on Campus” (Final submission deadline: 2021/8/31)      The Journal of Research in Education Sciences will no longer provide printed copies      Call for papers for the special issue “Educational Research Related to Southeast Asian Countries” (Final submission deadline: 2018/12/31)     

Journal directory listing - Volume 21-30 (1976-1985) - Volume 26 (1981)
Back

A Comparison of Teaching Effect on Learning Through Cognitive Learning in Physical Education Author: Hwang Kow-Yi

Abstract：

The study was conducted during the First Term of 1981. Subjects were 80 male students at the Ho-ping Junior High School, Taipei. According to their Pre-class test results, they were divided homogeneously into 4 groups. Each group received 3 weeks "Basketball Set-Shot" instruction. The teaching methods were:
group I: Students were given instructions, demonstration and clue of feed-back.
groupII: Students were given instructions, demonstration, However with no clue of feedback. groupIII:Students were given instructions, however with no demonstraction and clue of feedback.
grpupIV:Nothing of above mentioned were given.
The Purpose of the present research was to investigate:
1. The variance from results of teaching Physical Education between cognitive learning and non-cognitive learning.
2. The variance among the various Physical Education teaching methods.
3. The variance from pre-class test to post-class test of 4 kind of Physical Education Teaching methods.
The data were subjected to Analysis of Variance and Posterion Comparisons Newman-Keuls Method. Along with a detailed analysis and discussion, the study drew the following conclusions.
1. Teaching Physical education with cognitive learning was signifi-cantly superior to non-cognitive learning (p<.01).
2. Teaching Method I was significently superior to Teaching. Method II (p<.01)and superior to Teaching Method III(p<.05)
3. Teaching Method II was superior to Teaching Method IV(p<-05)
4. Although each teaching method has its strength and weakness, Yet by companing the results of Pre-class test and Post-class test it is found each teaching method have considerable im-porvement(p<.01).

《Full Text》