期刊目錄列表 - 31~41期(1986-1996) - 第三十四期 (1989)

蓋迪藝術教育中心對DBAE理論之研究、實驗和推廣 作者:郭禎祥(國立臺灣師範大學美術研究所)

摘要:

"藝術教育應該要更務實、更嚴謹、也更富於知性。在蓋迪藝術教育中心,藝術教育重獲生機,也有新的定義"。(Duke, 1984)
本文有鑑於蓋迪藝術中心對資助並推廣「以學科為基礎的藝術教育」理論的研究有所支持與貢獻而影響美加地區當今藝術教育活動發展的趨勢。因此將蓋迪藝術教育中心做一簡介,並探討其對DBAE理論之研究,實驗與推廣的狀況以供我國改革藝術教育之參考與指標。
傳統的思想認為藝術教育不是一項有目標而實質的教學課程。藝術教育對一個孩子的完整教育之重要性,從來就不被眾人所接受,而藝術所蘊含的知識和這種知識有助於瞭解人類之價值也受到同樣的忽視。晚近,若干有關國民教育的研究對這個傳統思想產生質疑。其中有好幾個研究承認藝術對教育的貢獻,並建議把藝術列入一般課程裡。J. Paul Getty Trust這個私人經營的信託基金會,認為上述的言論是和學校當局以及藝術團體共同來改善藝術教育品質的好機會。蓋迪中心以下列兩大前提為其活動的主導:一、由於藝術是文化的寶庫,學習藝術是瞭解人類的經驗和傳承文化價值的一個根本基礎;二、個人若沒有學習藝術,他的教育就不算完整。三、如果大眾所知和學校所教的藝術要有重大改變,我們必須對藝術的教學和如何教,有更完整的瞭解。
一個有實質意義的藝術課程,應當輔導兒童瞭解產生藝術的歷史和文化背景,也應該輔導他們認識美在自然界,在人為的環境裡,以及在藝術作品中的特質。還應該 讓他們有機會創造自己的作品。同時鼓勵他們敘述,分析以及詮釋藝術作品。以上這些層面對於完成一項更完整、嚴謹的藝術課程都是必要的。
從過去五年半來蓋迪藝術教育中心在藝術教育所做的研究發展活動,我們可以預期其將來的走向及目標,藝術是我們和他人溝通我們對人生之領悟的方法。我們在藝術作品裡注入、表達我們的希望、恐懼和價值。我們對世界的看法和我們彼此的關係都反映在我們的藝術作品裡。我們確定我們需要藝術,因為藝術讓我們分享那些無法言傳,但卻肯定我們人情事故的感知。我們也確定,如果藝術要恢復它的生機,以便在通才教育的主流裡受人敬重,那麼它必須重做界定,要把美感、藝術史、藝術評論、以及藝術創作與表現的活動包括在內。那就是蓋迪藝術教育中心的中心目標。

《詳全文》

Journal directory listing - Volume 31-41 (1986-1996) - Volume 34 (1989)

A Grand Experiment in Dbae: The Getty Center for Education in the Arts Author: Ann C. S. Kuo

Abstract:

The Getty Center for Education in the Arts, an operating unit of the J. Paul Getty Trust, established the 1983 and 1984 Institutes for Educators on the visual Arts to explore the introduction of discipline-based art programs into elementary schools of the United States. Leilani Lattin Duke, the Director of the Getty Center, has stressed that study of the arts should be an integral part of all children's education.
The origin of the J. Paul Getty Trust was set up by its founder as a private operating foundation. Unlike a grant-making foundation, which funds the programs of others, the primary purpose of the Getty is to create and operate its own programs.
The Center's stated mission is to improve the quality and status of arts education in America's schools. To bring about any significant change in the way the public perceives art and in the way teachers teach it, we need a more comprehensive under-standing of how and why the arts are taught.
The Center had two components, summer staff-development programs for school-district personnel and year-long curriculum implementation programs. The designers hoped that participants would view art education as fostering understanding and appreciation of serious works of art and view art as an educative force and cultural necessity. They expected participants subsequently to teach their students to encounter serious works of art in meaningful ways and to establish programs offering balanced art instruction in aesthetics, studio production, art criticism, and art history. Today, we believe it is demonstrably evident that the discipline-based approach is becoming acceptable nationwide as the new standard for art education, the goals of the Center for DBAE are virtually identical to the aims stated by the National Art Education Association for achieving "Quality Art Education."
In the past five and a half years the Getty Center for Education on the visual Arts has made a notable beginning toward achieving one of the goals of the J. Paul Getty Trust: enhancement of the public's understanding and appreciation of the visual arts. As the Trust looks to the future, it anticipates preparing a generation of students who will provide leadership for greater involvement in, and understanding of, the arts in their communities.
As the Center becomes more experienced, it will learn more about where and how the Getty Center can help improve the status of education in the arts.
The arts are a means of communicating with others, the very essence of our understanding of life. Our hopes, fears, and values are infused into our works of art. Our views of the world and our relationships to each other are reflected in our arts. We are certain that we need the arts because they permit us to share perceptions that cannot be expressed verbally but nevertheless affirm our common sense of humanity. If education in the arts is to be revitalized so that it can find a place of respect in the mainstream of general education, then it needs to be redefined to include aesthetic perception, art history, art criticism, along with creative and expres-sive activities. All this is the central purpose at the Getty Center for Education in the Arts.