期刊目錄列表 - 63卷(2018) - 【教育科學研究期刊】63(3)九月刊
Directory
教師工作價值觀量表之編製
作者:國立臺灣師範大學心理與教育測驗研究發展中心趙子揚、國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系宋曜廷、國立臺灣師範大學心理與教育測驗研究發展中心許明輝
卷期：63卷第3期
日期：2018年9月
頁碼：163-196
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.201809_63(3).0006
摘要：
本研究編製一份教師工作價值觀量表，期望未來幫助師資培育單位檢視師資生的教師工作價值觀，以提供學業成就之外的指標。研究一以30位資深教師，透過四場焦點團體之內容分析及文獻整理，初步整理出18個向度作為量表編製之依據；研究二分為預試階段及正式施測兩個階段。在預試階段方面，經由200位大學生之預試結果，最後保留76題，共10個向度之正式題本，其向度分別為「專業自我實現」、「專業自我成長」、「思考與挑戰性」、「引導陪伴學生」、「社會貢獻」、「公平正義」、「人際互動與管理」、「藝術體能活動」、「工作條件與福利」及「社會地位」。在正式施測方面，召募800位大學生作為參與者，進行信度及效度之檢驗。從折半信度及內部一致性之結果，顯示教師工作價值觀量表具有良好的信度。從驗證性因素分析之結果，本研究提供教師工作價值觀之構念效度證據，並針對教師工作價值觀編製之結果，提出未來實務應用上之建議。
關鍵詞：工作價值觀、師資生、教師工作價值觀、教師工作價值觀量表
《詳全文》
參考文獻：
- 宋曜廷、潘佩妤（2010）。混合研究在教育研究的應用。教育科學研究期刊，55（4），97-130。 【Sung, Y.-T., & Pan, P.-Y. (2010). Applications of mixed methods research in educational studies. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 55(4), 97-130. 】
- 吳鐵雄、李坤崇、劉佑星、歐慧敏（1995）。工作價值觀量表之編製初步報告。測驗年刊，42，227-243。 【Wu, T.-H., Lee, K.-C., Liu, Y.-H., & Ou, H.-M. (1995). A preliminary report on the construction of work value inventory. Psychological Testing, 42, 227-243.】
- 吳淑禎（2012）。師資生的工作價值觀與生涯定向研究。中等教育，63（1），61-80。 【Wu, S.-C. (2012). The study of work value and career decidedness of pre-service teacher. Secondary Education, 63(1), 61-80. 】
- 吳清基、黃嘉莉、張明文（2011）。我國師資培育政策回顧與展望。載於國家教育研究院（主編），我國百年教育回顧與展望（pp. 1-20）。新北市：編者。 【Wu, C.-J., Huang, J.-L., & Chang, M.-W. (2011). Retrospect and prospect of teacher education policy in Taiwan. In National Academy for Education Research (Ed.), Retrospect and prospect of education over the past one hundred years in Taiwan (pp. 1-20). New Taipei City, Taiwan: Editor.】
- 張瑞村（2008a）。中等學校教育實習輔導教師教學輔導方式、實習教師工作價值觀與實習教師教學效能關係之研究。朝陽人文社會學刊，6（1），59-121。 【Chang, R.-T. (2008a). A study of the relationships among mentors’ teaching mentoring styles, student-teachers’ work values, and student-teachers’ teaching effectiveness. Chaoyang Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(1), 59-121. 】
» 展開更多
- 宋曜廷、潘佩妤（2010）。混合研究在教育研究的應用。教育科學研究期刊，55（4），97-130。 【Sung, Y.-T., & Pan, P.-Y. (2010). Applications of mixed methods research in educational studies. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 55(4), 97-130. 】
- 吳鐵雄、李坤崇、劉佑星、歐慧敏（1995）。工作價值觀量表之編製初步報告。測驗年刊，42，227-243。 【Wu, T.-H., Lee, K.-C., Liu, Y.-H., & Ou, H.-M. (1995). A preliminary report on the construction of work value inventory. Psychological Testing, 42, 227-243.】
- 吳淑禎（2012）。師資生的工作價值觀與生涯定向研究。中等教育，63（1），61-80。 【Wu, S.-C. (2012). The study of work value and career decidedness of pre-service teacher. Secondary Education, 63(1), 61-80. 】
- 吳清基、黃嘉莉、張明文（2011）。我國師資培育政策回顧與展望。載於國家教育研究院（主編），我國百年教育回顧與展望（pp. 1-20）。新北市：編者。 【Wu, C.-J., Huang, J.-L., & Chang, M.-W. (2011). Retrospect and prospect of teacher education policy in Taiwan. In National Academy for Education Research (Ed.), Retrospect and prospect of education over the past one hundred years in Taiwan (pp. 1-20). New Taipei City, Taiwan: Editor.】
- 張瑞村（2008a）。中等學校教育實習輔導教師教學輔導方式、實習教師工作價值觀與實習教師教學效能關係之研究。朝陽人文社會學刊，6（1），59-121。 【Chang, R.-T. (2008a). A study of the relationships among mentors’ teaching mentoring styles, student-teachers’ work values, and student-teachers’ teaching effectiveness. Chaoyang Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(1), 59-121. 】
- 張瑞村（2008b）。幼稚園教師工作價值觀之初探研究。朝陽人文社會學刊，6（2），145-196。 【Chang, R.-T. (2008b). A preliminary study of kindergarten teachers’ work values associate professor of teacher education center. Chaoyang Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(2), 145-196. 】
- 張瑞村、劉乙儀（2014）。師資生工作價值觀之調查研究。朝陽人文社會學刊，12（1），95-143。 【Chang, R.-T., & Liu, Y.-Y. (2014). An investigation of the teacher education students’ work values. Chaoyang Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 12(1), 95-143.】
- 程姿螢、張詠婷、宋曜廷（2016）。大專學生工作價值組合量表之編製及信效度研究。教育心理學報，48（1），91-112。 【Cheng, T.-Y., Chang, Y.-T., & Sung, Y.-T. (2016). The development of the work value assembly scale for college students. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 48(1), 91-112. 】
- 趙子揚、黃嘉莉、宋曜廷、郭蕙寧、許明輝（2016）。教師情境判斷測驗之編製。教育科學研究期刊，61（2），85-117。 【Chao, T.-Y., Huang, J.-L., Sung, Y.-T., Kuo, H.-N., & Shiu, M.-H. (2016). Construction of the teacher situational judgment test. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 61(2), 85-117. 】Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94. doi:10.1007/BF02723327
- Bearden, W. O., Sharma, S., & Teel, J. E. (1982). Sample size effects on chi square and other statistics used in evaluating causal models. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(4), 425-430. doi:10.2307/3151716
- Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. doi:10.4324/9780203726532
- Caena, F. (2011). Teachers’ core competences: Requirements and development. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/education_culture/repository/education/policy/strategic-framework/doc/teacher-competences_en.pdf
- Casey, C. E., & Childs, R. A. (2007). Teacher education program admission criteria and what beginning teachers need to know to be successful teachers. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 67, 1-24.
- Casey, C. E., & Childs, R. A. (2011). Teacher education admission criteria as measure of preparedness for teaching. Canadian Journal of Education, 34(2), 3-20.
- Clark, S. K., Byrnes, D., & Sudweeks, R. R. (2014). A comparative examination of student teacher and intern perceptions of teaching ability at the pre-service and in-service stages. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(2), 170-183. doi:10.1177/0022487114561659
- Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Dawis, R. V., & Lofquist, L. H. (1984). A psychological theory of work adjustment: An individual-differences model and its applications. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
- Department for Education. (2010). The importance of teaching: The schools white paper 2010. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-importance-of-teaching-the- schools-white-paper-2010
- Dicke, T., Elling, J., Schmeck, A., & Leutner, D. (2015). Reducing reality shock: The effects of classroom management skills training on beginning teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 48, 1-12. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2015.01.013
- Ebel, R. L., & Frisbie, D. A. (1991). Essentials of educational measurement (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Educational Testing Service. (2018). The Praxis® Tests information bulletin. Retrieved from https://www.ets.org/s/praxis/pdf/praxis_information_bulletin.pdf
- Ginzberg, E., Ginsburg, S. W., Axelrad, S., & Herma, J. L. (1951). Toward a theory of occupational choice. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
- Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Henke, R. R., Chen, X., & Geis, S. (2000). Progress through the teacher pipeline: 1992-93 college graduates and elementary/secondary school teaching as of 1997. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
- Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
- Ingvarson, L., & Rowley, G. (2017). Quality assurance in teacher education and outcomes: A study of 17 countries. Educational Researcher, 46(4), 177-193. doi:10.3102/0013189X17711900
- Jaw, B.-S., Ling, Y.-H., Wang, C. Y.-P., & Chang, W.-C. (2007). The impact of culture on Chinese employees’ work values. Personnel Review, 36(1), 128-144. doi:10.1108/00483480710716759
- Johnson, S. M., & Birkeland, S. E. (2003). Pursuing a “Sense of success”: New teachers explain their career decisions. American Educational Research Journal, 40(3), 581-617. doi:10.3102/ 00028312040003581
- Kalleberg, A. L. (1977). Work values and job rewards: A theory of job satisfaction. American Sociological Review, 42(1), 124-143. doi:10.2307/2117735
- Krueger, R. A. (1998). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. London, UK: Sage.
- Labaree, D. F. (2000). Educational researchers: Living with a lesser form of knowledge. In C. Day, A. Fernandez, T. E. Hauge, & J. Møller (Eds.), The life and work of teachers: International perspectives in changing times (pp. 55-75). London, UK: Falmer Press.
- Lam, B. H. (2012). Why do they want to become teachers a study on prospective teachers’ motivation to teach in Hong Kong? The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 21(2), 307-314.
- Lokan, J., Ford, P., & Greenwood, L. (1996). Maths and science on the line: Australian junior secondary students’ performance in the third international mathematics and science study. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.
- Mahmood, S. (2013). “Reality Shock”: New early childhood education teachers. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 34(2), 154-170. doi:10.1080/10901027.2013.787477
- Manuel, J., & Hughes, J. (2006). ‘It has always been my dream’: Exploring pre-service teachers’ motivations for choosing to teach. Teacher Development, 10(1), 5-24. doi:10.1080/13664530 600587311
- McCloy, R., Waugh, G., Medsker, G., Wall, J., Rivkin, D., & Lewis, P. (1999). Development of the O*NETTM computerized work importance profiler. Raleigh, NC: National Center for O*NET Development.
- Mikitovics, A., & Crehan, K. D. (2002). Pre-professional skills test scores as college of education admission criteria. The Journal of Educational Research, 95(4), 215-223. doi:10.1080/ 00220670209596594
- Miller, W. L., & Crabtree, B. F. (1999). Doing qualitative research (2nd ed.). London, UK: Sage.
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
- Nie, T., & Wang, W. (2015). Work values scale for manufacturing workers based on factor analysis. Journal of Beijing Information Science & Technology University, 30(4), 94-98.
- Paulick, I., Retelsdorf, J., & Möller, J. (2013). Motivation for choosing teacher education: Associations with teachers’ achievement goals and instructional practices. International Journal of Educational Research, 61, 60-70. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2013.04.001
- Pohlmann, B., & Möller, J. (2010). Fragebogen zur Erfassung der Motivation für die Wahl des Lehramtsstudiums (FEMOLA). Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 24(1), 73-84. doi:10.1024/1010-0652/a000005
- Pryor, R. (1979). In search of a concept: Work values. Vocational Guidance Quarterly, 27(3), 250-258. doi:10.1002/j.2164-585X.1979.tb00993.x
- Richardson, P. W., & Watt, H. M. G. (2006). Who chooses teaching and why? Profiling characteristics and motivations across three Australian universities. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 34(1), 27-56. doi:10.1080/13598660500480290
- Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York, NY: Free Press.
- Ryan, T. G., Schruder, C. R., & Robinson, S. (2013). Concurrent pre-service teachers: An analysis of values. Issues in Educational Research, 23(3), 394-414.
- Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1-65. doi:10. 1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6
- Schwartz, S. H. (1999). A theory of cultural values and some implications for work. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 48(1), 23-47. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.1999.tb00047.x
- Sinclair, C. (2008). Initial and changing student teacher motivation and commitment to teaching. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 36(2), 79-104. doi:10.1080/13598660801971658
- Super, D. E. (1970). Work values inventory. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
- Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2006). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
- U.S. Department of Labor. (2002). Work importance profiler-user’s guide (3th ed.). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
- Watt, H. M. G., & Richardson, P. W. (2007). Motivational factors influencing teaching as a career choice: Development and validation of the FIT-Choice scale. Journal of Experimental Education, 75(3), 167-202. doi:10.3200/JEXE.75.3.167-202
- Whetzel, D. L., & McDaniel, M. A. (2009). Situational judgment tests: An overview of current research. Human Resource Management Review, 19(3), 188-202. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.03.007
- Wigfield, A., & Cambria, J. (2010). Expectancy-value theory: Retrospective and prospective. In T. C. Urdan & S. A. Karabenick (Eds.), The decade ahead: Theoretical perspectives on motivation and achievement (pp. 35-70). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.
- Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68-81. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
- Zhang, W., & Chen, H. (2015). The structure and measurement of the work values of Chinese civil servants: The case of Hangzhou city government. Public Personnel Management, 44(4), 559-576. doi:10.1177/0091026015607107
- Zytowski, D. G. (1994). A super contribution to vocational theory: Work values. Career Development Quarterly, 43(1), 25-31. doi:10.1002/j.2161-0045.1994.tb00843.x
Journal directory listing - Volume 63 (2018) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【63(3)】september
Directory
Construction of the Work Values Scale for Teachers
Author: Tzu-Yang Chao (Research Center for Psychological and Educational Testing, National Taiwan Normal University), Yao-Ting Sung (Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling, National Taiwan Normal University), Ming-Hui Hsu (Research Center for Psychological and Educational Testing, National Taiwan Normal University)
Vol.&No.：Vol. 63, No.3
Date：September 2018
Pages：163-196
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.201809_63(3).0006
Abstract：
This study developed a work values scale for teachers (WVST) to enable teacher education institutions to inspect the work values of student teachers. In Study 1, we employed focus groups and examined the literature. Through conducting a content analysis of four focus groups comprising 30 experienced teachers and comparing the analysis results with the literature, we assembled 18 dimensions to form the basis of the WVST. In Study 2, we conducted scale evaluation, which was divided into a pilot-test stage and a formal-test stage. In the pilot-test stage, we recruited 200 university students as participants. After conducting an item analysis and an exploratory factor analysis, we retained 76 items and ten dimensions, namely professional self-realization, professional self-growth, reflection and challenges, guiding students, social contribution, equality and justice, interpersonal interaction and management, artistic and physical activities, working conditions and benefits, and social status. In the formal-test stage, we recruited 800 university students to complete the WVST in order to determine scale reliability and validity. The results for split-half reliability and internal consistency reliability revealed that the WVST achieved favorable reliability. The results from confirmatory factor analysis also indicated the construct validity of the WVST. On the basis of these results, we provided suggestions for future practical applications of the WVST in measuring the work values of teachers.
Keywords：student teachers, teachers’ work values, work values, work values scale for teachers