期刊目錄列表 - 64卷(2019) - 【教育科學研究期刊】64(4)十二月刊
Directory
促進中文閱讀理解教學成效量化研究統合：調節變項影響與評估
作者:國家教育研究院測驗及評量研究中心謝進昌
卷期：64卷第4期
日期：2019年12月
頁碼：175-206
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.201912_64(4).0007
摘要：
以實徵研究證據為基礎，探討促進學生中文閱讀理解教學議題逐漸受到重視，而使用量化統合技術推動本議題的研究，亦愈趨興盛，然而，受限研究數量，鮮少文獻針對調節變項進行深入分析，據此，本研究目的除了分析促進中文閱讀理解教學之量化統合效果外，更聚焦於探討教學介入、參與者背景特徵、個別研究品質評估等因素，對於教學效果量可能產生的調節影響。本研究經統合分析與刪除極端值，發現國內促進中文閱讀理解教學平均效果量，分別具有+0.43立即效果（168筆）與+0.39延宕效果（46筆），為近中等程度教學成效，續經調節變項分析，發現文本重複閱讀具有顯著偏低平均教學效果、使用預測策略則具有較高教學成效，同時，參與者為特殊生或國中階段學生、使用研究者自編評量工具、實驗設計：其他與納入個別研究的品質較差者，皆可產生顯著偏高教學平均效果量。最後針對分析結果提出幾點未來實務與研究建議。
關鍵詞：中文閱讀理解、個別研究品質評估、統合分析、量化研究統合、調節變項分析
《詳全文》
參考文獻：
- 王玳雅（2013）。故事結構教學對國小學童閱讀理解能力影響之後設分析（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺北教育大學，臺北市。 【Wang, T.-Y. (2013). The effects of story grammar instruction on reading comprehension for elementary school students in Taiwan: A meta-analysis (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Taipei University of Education, Taipei, Taiwan.】
- 行政院公報資訊網（2018）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校語文領域：國語文。取自http://gazette2.nat.gov.tw/EG_FileManager/eguploadpub/eg024018/ch05/type2/gov40/num11/images/BB.pdf 【The Executive Yuan Gazette Online. (2018). The national curriculum of 12-year basic education for elementary and high school: Chinese. Retrieved from http://gazette2.nat.gov.tw/EG_FileManager/eguploadpub/eg024018/ch05/type2/gov40/num11/images/BB.pdf】
- 吳庭耀（2009）。比較不同閱讀理解策略對國小中年級低閱讀能力學童在不同文體之閱讀流暢度與閱讀理解表現之差異研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺南大學，臺南市。 【Wu, T.-Y. (2009). Comparison research of different reading comprehension strategies toward middle-grade students with low reading skills on reading fluency and comprehension in different text forms (Unpublished master’s thesis). The National Tainan University, Tainan, Taiwan.】
- 吳潔蓉（2010）。運用交互教學法促進國小學童科學閱讀之成效（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺北教育大學，臺北市。 【Wu, C.-J. (2010). Using reciprocal teaching to improve science reading performance using reciprocal teaching to improve science reading performance (Unpublished master’s thesis). The National Taipei University of Education, Taipei, Taiwan.】
- 吳裕聖（2007）。鷹架概念構圖教學模式的建立與實施成效研究（未出版博士論文）。國立中正大學，嘉義縣。 【Wu, Y.-S. (2007). Scaffold-concept-mapping instruction: A model and its effects (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). National Chung Cheng University, Chiayi County, Taiwan.】
» 展開更多
- 王玳雅（2013）。故事結構教學對國小學童閱讀理解能力影響之後設分析（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺北教育大學，臺北市。 【Wang, T.-Y. (2013). The effects of story grammar instruction on reading comprehension for elementary school students in Taiwan: A meta-analysis (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Taipei University of Education, Taipei, Taiwan.】
- 行政院公報資訊網（2018）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校語文領域：國語文。取自http://gazette2.nat.gov.tw/EG_FileManager/eguploadpub/eg024018/ch05/type2/gov40/num11/images/BB.pdf 【The Executive Yuan Gazette Online. (2018). The national curriculum of 12-year basic education for elementary and high school: Chinese. Retrieved from http://gazette2.nat.gov.tw/EG_FileManager/eguploadpub/eg024018/ch05/type2/gov40/num11/images/BB.pdf】
- 吳庭耀（2009）。比較不同閱讀理解策略對國小中年級低閱讀能力學童在不同文體之閱讀流暢度與閱讀理解表現之差異研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺南大學，臺南市。 【Wu, T.-Y. (2009). Comparison research of different reading comprehension strategies toward middle-grade students with low reading skills on reading fluency and comprehension in different text forms (Unpublished master’s thesis). The National Tainan University, Tainan, Taiwan.】
- 吳潔蓉（2010）。運用交互教學法促進國小學童科學閱讀之成效（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺北教育大學，臺北市。 【Wu, C.-J. (2010). Using reciprocal teaching to improve science reading performance using reciprocal teaching to improve science reading performance (Unpublished master’s thesis). The National Taipei University of Education, Taipei, Taiwan.】
- 吳裕聖（2007）。鷹架概念構圖教學模式的建立與實施成效研究（未出版博士論文）。國立中正大學，嘉義縣。 【Wu, Y.-S. (2007). Scaffold-concept-mapping instruction: A model and its effects (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). National Chung Cheng University, Chiayi County, Taiwan.】
- 林容妃（2005）。兒童科普讀物的閱讀理解教學對國小學童自然科學習之相關研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺北師範學院，臺北市。 【Lin, J.-F. (2005). Research on the influence of reading comprehension instructions from children’s science books on pupils’ science learning (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Taipei Teachers College, Taipei, Taiwan.】
- 柯華葳、幸曼玲、陸怡琮、辜玉旻（2010）。閱讀理解策略教學手冊。臺北市：教育部。 【Ko, H.-W., Shing, M.-L., Lu, I.-C., & Ku, Y.-M. (2010). Reading comprehension strategies instruction manual. Taipei, Taiwan: Ministry of Education.】
- 洪采菱（2008）。廣泛閱讀與重複閱讀教學法對國小一年級學童識字能力、口語閱讀流暢力及閱讀理解之影響（未出版碩士論文）。國立屏東教育大學，屏東縣。 【Hung, T.-L. (2008). The effects of wide reading versus repeated reading on the first-grade in word recognition, oral reading fluency and comprehension (Unpublished master’s thesis). The National Pingtung University, Pingtung, Taiwan.】
- 許慧君（2011）。摘要策略教學對國小五年級學童閱讀理解成效之研究（未出版碩士論文）。銘傳大學，臺北市。 【Hsu, H.-C. (2011). The study on the effects of reading comprehension via summary instruction for the fifth graders (Unpublished master’s thesis). Ming Chuan University, Taipei, Taiwan.】
- 連啟舜（2002）。國內閱讀理解教學研究成效之統合分析研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。 【Lien, C.-S. (2002). Meta-analysis of reading comprehension instruction studies’ outcome (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.】
- 郭玥妦（2009）。引導式閱讀策略融入網路讀書會於提升國小五年級閱讀素養成效之研究（未出版碩士論文）。淡江大學，新北市。 【Kuo, Y.-F. (2009). The effects of guided reading strategy into the online reading club on reading literacy for the 5th graders (Unpublished master’s thesis). Tamkang University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.】
- 陳明蕾（2019）。台灣十年來教師閱讀教學與學生閱讀表現關係之探討：來自PIRLS 2006、2011與2016的證據。教育心理學報，51（1），51-82。doi:10.6251/bep.201909_51(1).0003 【Chen, M.-L. (2019). The relationship between teacher reading instruction and students’ reading performance in the past ten years of Taiwan: Evidence from PIRLS 2006, 2011 and 2016. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 51(1), 51-82. doi:10.6251/bep.201909_51(1).0003】
- 程炳林（1995）。自我調整學習的模式驗證及其教學效果之研究（未出版博士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。 【Cherng, B.-L. (1995). Study of certification of the self-regulated learning model and its instruction effect (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.】
- 黃瓊儀（2012）。台灣近十年閱讀障礙學童閱讀理解策略教學成效之後設分析。東臺灣特殊教育學報，14，243-268。 【Huang, C.-Y. (2012). Meta-analysis of reading comprehension instruction studies’ outcome in Taiwan: A quantitative synthesis of single-subject researches. Bulletin of Eastern-Taiwan Special Education, 14, 243-268.】
- 謝進昌（2012）。不同實驗設計之標準化平均數差異效果量整合探討。屏東教育大學學報，38，57-92。 【Hsieh, J.-C. (2012). Combining effect size estimates across different experimental designs in meta-analysis. Journal of National Pingtung University Education, 38, 57-92.】
- 謝進昌（2015）。有效的中文閱讀理解策略：國內實徵研究之最佳證據整合。教育科學研究期刊，60（2），33-77。doi:10.6209/JORIES.2015.60(2).02 【Hsieh, J.-C. (2015). Effective Chinese reading comprehension strategy: Best-evidence synthesis of Taiwanese empirical studies. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 60(2), 33-77. doi:10.6209/JORIES.2015.60(2). 02】
- 魏筱珊（2011）。多媒體閱讀公路教學策略對低閱讀理解能力學生閱讀理解學習成效之研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺南大學，臺南市。 【Wei, H.-S. (2011). Research on the effect of reading comprehension of instruction of multimedia-reading road map strategy for students with low comprehension performance (Unpublished master’s thesis). National University of Tainan, Tainan, Taiwan.】
- Ardasheva, Y., Wang, Z., Adesope, O. O., & Valentine, J. C. (2017). Exploring effectiveness and moderators of language learning strategy instruction on second language and self-regulated learning outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 87(3), 544-582. doi:10.3102/003465431 6689135
- Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Hurley, M. M., & Wilkinson, B. (2004). The effects of school based writing-to-learn interventions on academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 29-58. doi:10.3102/00346543074001029
- Beck, I. L., & McKeown, M. G. (2006). Improving comprehension with questioning the author: A fresh and expanded view of a powerful approach. New York, NY: Scholastic.
- Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons. doi:10.1002/9780470743386
- Chall, J. S. (1996). Stages of reading development (2nd ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.
- Cheung, A. C. K., & Slavin, R. E. (2012). How features of educational technology applications affect student reading outcomes: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 7(3), 198-215. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2012.05.002
- Cheung, A. C. K., & Slavin, R. E. (2016). How methodological features affect effect sizes in education. Educational Researcher, 45(5), 283-292. doi:10.3102/0013189X16656615
- Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155-159. doi:10.1037/0033-2909. 112.1.155
- Cole, M. W. (2014). Speaking to read: Meta-analysis of peer-mediated learning for English language learners. Journal of Literacy Research, 46(3), 358-382. doi:10.1177/1086296X14552179
- Cook, B. G., Buysse, V., Klingner, J., Landrum, T. J., McWilliam, R. A., Tankersley, M., & Test, D. W. (2015). CEC’s standards for classifying the evidence base of practices in special education. Remedial and Special Education, 36(4), 220-234. doi:10.1177/0741932514557271
- Cote, N., & Goldman, S. R. (1999). Building representations of informational text: Evidence from children’s think-aloud protocols. In H. van Oostendorp & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 169-193). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Davis, D. S. (2010). A met-analysis of comprehension strategy instruction for upper elementary and middle school students (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Graduate School of Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
- De Boer, H., Donker, A. S., & van der Werf, M. P. C. (2014). Effects of the attributes of educational interventions on students’ academic performance: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 84(4), 509-545. doi:10.3102/0034654314540006
- De Lemos, M. M. (2002). Closing the gap between research and practices: Foundation for the acquisition of literacy. Camberwell, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.
- Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56(2), 455-463. doi:10.1111/j. 0006-341X.2000.00455.x
- García, J. R., & Cain, K. (2014). Decoding and reading comprehension: A meta-analysis to identify which reader and assessment characteristics influence the strength of the relationship in English. Review of Educational Research, 84(1), 74-111. doi:10.3102/0034654313499616
- Gersten, R., Fuchs, L. S., Compton, D., Coyne, M., Greenwood, C., & Innocenti, M. S. (2005). Quality indicators for group experimental and quasi-experimental research in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 149-164. doi:10.1177/001440290507100202
- Glass, G. V., McGaw, B., & Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
- Graham, S., & Hebert, M. (2011). Writing to read: A meta-analysis of the impact of writing and writing instruction on reading. Harvard Educational Review, 81(4), 710-785. doi:10.17763/haer. 81.4.t2k0m13756113566
- Guthrie, J. T., Van Meter, P., McCann, A. D., Wigfield, A., Bennett, L., Ponnstone, C. C., …Mitchell, A. M. (1996). Growth of literacy engagement: Changes in motivations and strategies during concept-oriented reading instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 31(3), 306-332. doi:10.1598/ RRQ.31.3.5
- Hall, M. S., & Burns, M. K. (2018). Meta-analysis of targeted small-group reading intervention. Journal of School Psychology, 66, 54-66. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2017.11.002
- Hebert, M., Bohaty, J. J., Nelson, J. R., & Brown, J. (2016). The effects of text structure instruction on expository reading comprehension: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(5), 609-629. doi:10.1037/edu0000082
- Hedges, L. V. (1981). Distribution theory for Glass’s estimator of effect size and related estimators. Journal of Educational Statistics, 6(2), 107-128. doi:10.2307/1164588
- Higgins, J. P. T., & Thompson, S. G. (2002). Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 21(11), 1539-1558. doi:10.1002/sim.1186
- King, A. (1994). Guiding knowledge construction in the classroom: Effect of teaching children how to question and how to explain. American Educational Research Journal, 31(2), 338-368. doi:10.3102/00028312031002338
- Light, R., & Pillemer, D. (1984). Summing up: The science of reviewing research. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Lipsey, M. W. (2009). Identifying interesting variables and analysis opportunities. In H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges, & J. C. Valentine (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (pp. 146-158). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation. doi:10.7758/9781610448864.11
- Marín-Martínez, F., & Sánchez-Meca, J. (2010). Weighting by inverse variance or by sample size in random-effects meta-analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(1), 56-73. doi:10.1177/0013164409344534
- Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Hooper, M. (2017). PIRLS 2016: International results in reading. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College and International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).
- National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: Author.
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2010). PISA 2009 results: Learning to learn – Student engagement, strategies and practices (Volume III). Paris, France: Author. doi:10. 1787/9789264083943-en
- Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117-175. doi:10.1207/ s1532690xci0102_1
- Paris, S. G., Cross, D. R., & Lipson, M. Y. (1984). Informed strategies for learning: A program to improve children’s reading awareness and comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(6), 1239-1252. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.76.6.1239
- Puzio, K., & Colby, G. T. (2013). Cooperative learning and literacy: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 6(4), 339-360. doi:10.1080/19345747.2013.775683
- Raphael, T. E. (1986). Teaching question answer relationships, revisited. The Reading Teacher, 39(6), 516-522.
- Rosenshine, B., & Meister, C. (1994). Reciprocal teaching: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 64(4), 479-530. doi:10.2307/1170585
- Rosenshine, B., Meister, C., & Chapman, S. (1996). Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 66(2), 181-221. doi:10. 2307/1170607
- Rumelhart, D. E. (1975). Notes on a schema for stories. In D. E. Bobrow & A. M. Collins (Eds.), Representing and understanding: Studies in cognitive science (pp. 211-236). New York, NY: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-108550-6.50013-6
- Scammacca, N. K., Roberts, G. J., Cho, E., Williams, K. J., Roberts, G., Vaughn, S. R., & Carroll, M. (2016). A century of progress: Reading interventions for students in grades 4-12, 1914-2014. Review of Educational Research, 86(3), 756-800. doi:10.3102/0034654316652942
- Scammacca, N. K., Roberts, G., Vaughn, S., & Stuebing, K. K. (2015). A meta-analysis of interventions for struggling readers in grades 4-12: 1980-2011. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(4), 369-390. doi:10.1177/0022219413504995
- Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
- Slavin, R. E. (1978). Student teams and achievement divisions. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 12(1), 39-49.
- Slavin, R. E. (2008). Perspectives on evidence-based research in education: What works? Issues in synthesizing educational program evaluations. Educational Researcher, 37(1), 5-14. doi:10. 3102/0013189X08314117
- Slavin, R. E., Lake, C., Chambers, B., Cheung, A., & Davis, S. (2009). Effective reading programs for the elementary grades: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 79(4), 1391-1466. doi:10.3102/0034654309341374
- Slavin, R. E., & Madden, N. A. (2011). Measures inherent to treatments in program effectiveness reviews. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 4(4), 370-380. doi:10.1080/ 19345747.2011.558986
- Snow, C. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
- Stevens, E. A., Park, S., & Vaugh, S. (2019). A review of summarizing and main idea interventions for struggling readers in grade 3 through 12: 1978-2016. Remedial and Special Education, 40(3), 131-149. doi:10.1177/0741932517749940
- Stevens, R. J., Madden, N. A., Slavin, R. E., & Farnish, A. M. (1987). Cooperative integrated reading and composition: Two field experiments. Reading Research Quarterly, 22(4), 433-454. doi:10.2307/747701
- Suggate, S. P. (2010). Why “what” we teach depends on “when”: Grade and reading intervention modality moderate effect size. Developmental Psychology, 46(6), 1556-1579. doi:10.1037/ a0020612
- Suggate, S. P. (2016). A meta-analysis of the long-term effects of phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, and reading comprehension interventions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49(1), 77-96. doi:10.1177/0022219414528540
- Therrien, W. J. (2004). Fluency and comprehension gains as a result of repeated reading: A meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 25(4), 252-261. doi:10.1177/0741932504025 0040801
- Valentine, J. C., & Cooper, H. (2008). A systematic and transparent approach for assessing the methodological quality of intervention effectiveness research: The Study Design and Implementation Assessment Device (Study DIAD). Psychological Methods, 13(2), 130-149. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.13.2.130
- Vaughn, S., Linan-Thompson, S., Kouzekanani, K., Bryant, D. P., Dickson, S., & Blozis, S. A. (2003). Reading instruction grouping for students with reading difficulties. Remedial and Special Education, 24(5), 301-315. doi:10.1177/07419325030240050501
- Viechtbauer, W. (2019). Package ‘metafor’. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ metafor/metafor.pdf
- Viechtbauer, W., & Cheung, M. W.-L. (2010). Outlier and influence diagnostics for meta-analysis. Research Synthesis Methods, 1(2), 112-125. doi:10.1002/jrsm.11
- Wanzek, J., Wexler, J., Vaughn, S., & Ciullo, S. (2010). Reading interventions for struggling readers in the upper elementary grades: A synthesis of 20 years of research. Reading and Writing, 23(8), 889-912. doi:10.1007/s11145-009-9179-5
- What Works Clearinghouse. (2017). What works clearinghouse: Standards handbook (version 4.0). Retrieved from https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/referenceresources/wwc_standards_handbook_ v4.pdf
- Wood, S. G., Moxley, J. H., Tighe, E. L., & Wagner, R. K. (2018). Does use of text-to-speech and related read-aloud tools improve reading comprehension for students with reading disabilities? A meta-analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 51(1), 73-84. doi:10.1177/00222194166 88170
Journal directory listing - Volume 64 (2019) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【64(4)】December
Directory
Synthesis of Quantitative Research on Chinese Reading Comprehension Instruction: Analysis of Moderating Effects
Author: Jin-Chang Hsieh (Research Center for Testing and Assessment, National Academy for Educational Research)
Vol.&No.：Vol. 64, No.4
Date：December 2019
Pages：175-206
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.201912_64(4).0007
Abstract：
Effective instructions for reading comprehension have been studied over the past few decades, and synthesis of quantitative research has also been conducted on such instructions to analyze their effect considering cumulative findings across relevant empirical studies. However, due to the limited number of included studies, more research into moderating effects is required. This study conducted a meta-analysis of the moderating effects of characteristics of instructional intervention, participants, and methodologies. A systematic literature review was undertaken to identify and collect relevant studies. General keywords were searched for in a Taiwanese literature database. A total of 880 Chinese reading-related articles were retrieved, and 173 articles were formally included on the basis of five inclusion and exclusion criteria. After the meta-analysis, an overall average effect size of +0.43 and +0.39 was obtained separately for immediate and follow-up effects. In the analysis of moderating effects, the findings indicated a significantly low average effect size for repeated reading instruction but a large average effect size for the use of a prediction strategy or research-developed measurement tool, struggling or middle-school-aged participants, and studies with poor experimental design or failure to meet relevant standards. Finally, some suggestions and implications are given for future research.
Keywords：Chinese reading comprehension, meta-analysis, moderator analysis, quality assessment of primary research, quantitative research synthesis