期刊目錄列表 - 66卷(2021) - 【教育科學研究期刊】66(3)九月刊
Directory
創造思考教學方案對高職生創造思考能力之效果與團體歷程分析（英文稿）
作者:國立臺灣科技大學數位學習與教育研究所陳秀玲、國立臺灣科技大學數位學習與教育研究所黃博聖、國立臺灣科技大學數位學習與教育研究所蘇筑筠
卷期：66卷第3期
日期：2021年9月
頁碼：279-303
DOI：https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202109_66(3).0009
摘要：
教導學生如何創意思考是國家持續發展與繁榮的重要關鍵。然而，目前普遍缺乏如何有效應用創意思考教學策略之討論。本研究主要目的在設計9週的創造力教學方案，並檢驗對於高職資訊科學生之創造思考能力的影響。採用準實驗研究之不等組設計，共85位高職生參與，實驗組為41人、控制組為44人。以新編創造思考測驗、Torrance圖形創造思考測驗之表現，分別作為創造力教學方案之前、後測，進行共變數分析。同時，蒐集教師個別訪談、課室觀察，以及學生焦點團體訪談與個別訪談等質性資料，來分析創造思考教學對高職生創意氛圍之影響。量化研究結果指出，實驗組於創造思考能力之流暢性、變通性、獨創性及精進性，皆顯著高於控制組。根據質性資料結果發現，實驗組在課程特性、團體動力、限制情境等主題上，皆有較佳的創意發想效果，此意味著本研究採用之創意思考教學策略，可有效提升高職生之創造思考能力，建議未來可整合至資訊科教育中。
關鍵詞：創造思考能力、創造思考教學、擴散性思考、歷程分析、高級職業學校
《詳全文》
參考文獻：
- Alkuş, S., & Olgan, R. (2014). Pre-service and in-service preschool teachers’ views regarding creativity in early childhood education. Early Child Development and Care, 184(12), 1902-1919. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2014.893236
- Baer, J. M. (1988). Long-term effects of creativity training with middle school students. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 8(2), 183-193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431688082006
- Baer, J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2008). Gender differences in creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 42(2), 75-105. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2008.tb01289.x
- Basadur, M. (1995). Optimal ideation-evaluation ratios. Creativity Research Journal, 8(1), 63-75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj0801_5
- Benjelloun, H. (2009). An empirical investigation of the use of humor in university classrooms. Education, Business and Society: Contemporary Middle Eastern Issues, 2(4), 312-322. https://doi.org/10.1108/17537980911001134
» 展開更多
- Alkuş, S., & Olgan, R. (2014). Pre-service and in-service preschool teachers’ views regarding creativity in early childhood education. Early Child Development and Care, 184(12), 1902-1919. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2014.893236
- Baer, J. M. (1988). Long-term effects of creativity training with middle school students. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 8(2), 183-193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431688082006
- Baer, J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2008). Gender differences in creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 42(2), 75-105. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2008.tb01289.x
- Basadur, M. (1995). Optimal ideation-evaluation ratios. Creativity Research Journal, 8(1), 63-75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj0801_5
- Benjelloun, H. (2009). An empirical investigation of the use of humor in university classrooms. Education, Business and Society: Contemporary Middle Eastern Issues, 2(4), 312-322. https://doi.org/10.1108/17537980911001134
- Caniëls, M. C. J., & Rietzschel, E. F. (2015). Organizing creativity: Creativity and innovation under constraints. Creativity and Innovation Management, 24(2), 184-196. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12123
- Chao, C.-Y., Liu, P.-T., Chang, T.-C., & Chiu, S.-I. (2010). The study of technology creativity teaching effectiveness for vocational high school: With project work as an example. Kaohsiung Normal University Journal. Education and Social Sciences, 29, 51-71. https://doi.org/10.7060/KNUJ-ES.201012.0051
- Chen, H.-L., & Chen, Y.-J. (2019). Influence of a creative problem-solving approach on college students’ creativity and its relation with team cohesion. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 64(3), 169-201. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.201909_64(3).0007
- Chen, L.-A. (2006). Creating the theory and practice of thinking teaching. Psybooks.
- Chen, L.-A., & Ju, S.-J. (1998). Creation and life. Wu-Nan.
- Cheng, Y.-Y., Wang, W.-V., & Chang, C.-M. (2003). Creative instruction experiment and subject matter development in Natural Science for Elementary School. Institute of Education National Sun Yat-sen University.
- Crawford, R. P. (1978). The techniques of creative thinking. In G. A. Davis & J. A. Scott (Eds.), Training creative thinking (pp. 99-101). Krieger.
- Cropley, A. (2006). In praise of convergent thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 18(3), 391-404. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1803_13
- Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). Attention and the holistic approach to behavior. In M. Csikszentmihalyi (Ed.), Flow and the foundations of positive psychology (pp. 1-20). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9088-8_1
- Drucker, P. (2012). Human capital, not cattle. In R. J. Baker (Ed.), Measure what matters to customers: Using key predictive indicators (pp. 127-137). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119201779.c14
- Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., & Smith, S. M. (1996). Creativity cognition: Theory, research, and applications. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7722.001.0001
- Guilford, J. P. (1968). Intelligence, creativity, and their educational implications. Knapp.
- Guilford, J. P. (1977). Way beyond the IQ. Creative Education Foundation.
- Hoegl, M., Gibbert, M., & Mazursky, D. (2008). Financial constraints in innovation projects: When is less more? Research Policy, 37(8), 1382-1391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.04.018
- Hong, J.-C., Tai, K.-H., Chen, P.-H., & Su, S.-Z. (2019). Revolutionary drawing: Measuring adaptive and innovative creativity. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 64(3), 143-168. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.201909_64(3).0006
- Hsiao, C.-C. (2017). Longitudinal analysis of scientific creativity course effectiveness. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 25(1), 47-73. https://doi.org/10.6173/CJSE.2017.2501.03
- Jensen, J. L., & Lawson, A. (2011). Effects of collaborative group composition and inquiry instruction on reasoning gains and achievement in undergraduate biology. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 10(1), 64-73. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.10-07-0089
- Kabanoff, B., & Bottger, P. (1991). Effectiveness of creativity training and its relation to selected personality factors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 12(3), 235-248. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030120306
- Karpova, E., Marcketti, S. B., & Barker, J. (2011). The efficacy of teaching creativity: Assessment of student creative thinking before and after exercises. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 29(1), 52-66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X11400065
- Kelley, R. (1992). The power of followership. Doubleday.
- Kim, K. H. (2011a). The APA 2009 Division 10 debate: Are the Torrance tests of creative thinking still relevant in the 21st century? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(4), 302-308. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021917
- Kim, K. H. (2011b). The creativity crisis: The decrease in creative thinking scores on the Torrance tests of creative thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 23(4), 285-295. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2011.627805
- Lancaster, C., Lenz, A. S., Brasfield, M. W., Bailey-Smith, L. A., & Dempsey, M. C. (2017). Evaluation of a school counselor-led creativity intervention group: An opportunity for school counselor leadership and advocacy. Journal of Counselor Leadership and Advocacy, 4(1), 16-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/2326716X.2016.1278412
- Lei, C.-U., So, H. K.-H., Lam, E. Y., Wong, K. K.-Y., Kwok, R. Y.-K., & Chan, C. K. Y. (2012). Teaching introductory electrical engineering: Project-based learning experience. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering (TALE) 2012 (pp. H1B-1-H1B-5). https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE.2012.6360320
- Li, H., Li, F., & Chen, T. (2018). A motivational-cognitive model of creativity and the role of autonomy. Journal of Business Research, 92, 179-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.025
- Meinel, M., Wagner, T. F., Baccarella, C. V., & Voigt, K. I. (2019). Exploring the effects of creativity training on creative performance and creative self‐efficacy: Evidence from a longitudinal study. Journal of Creative Behavior, 53(4), 546-558. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.234
- Mumford, M. D., Medeiros, K. E., & Partlow, P. J. (2012). Creative thinking: Processes, strategies, and knowledge. Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(1), 30-47. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.003
- Nakagawa, T. (2011). Education and training of creative problem solving thinking with TRIZ/USIT. Procedia Engineering, 9, 582-595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.03.144
- Osborn, A. F. (1953). Applied imagination. Scribners.
- Pahl, G., Beitz, W., Feldhusen, J., & Grote, K.-H. (2007). Engineering design: A systematic approach. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-319-2
- Parnes, S. J. (1967). Creative behavior guidebook. Scribners.
- Pavlović, J., Maksić, S., & Bodroža, B. (2013). Implicit individualism in teachers’ theories of creativity: Through the “four P’s” looking glass. The International Journal of Creativity and Problem Solving, 23(1), 39-57.
- Phillips, D. J. (1948). Report on discussion 66. Adult Education Journal, 7, 181-182.
- Piirto, J. (2004). Understanding creativity. Great Potential Press.
- Roskes, M. (2015). Constraints that help or hinder creative performance: A motivational approach. Creativity and Innovation Management, 24(2), 197-206. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12086
- Runco, M. A. (2003). Critical creative processes. Hampton.
- Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., Adler, N., Aharon-Peretz, J., Perry, D., & Mayseless, N. (2011). The origins of originality: The neural bases of creative thinking and originality. Neuropsychologia, 49(2), 178-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.11.020
- Somech, A., & Drach-Zahavy, A. (2013). Translating team creativity to innovation implementation: The role of team composition and climate for innovation. Journal of Management, 39(3), 684-708. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310394187
- Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. Free Press. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.33-1835
- Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage.
- Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Nelson-Hall.
- Torrance, E. P. (1966). Torrance tests of creative thinking－Norms-technical manual research edition-verbal tests, forms A and B- figural tests, forms A and B. Personnel Press.
- Torrance, E. P. (2008). Torrance tests of creative thinking: Norms-technical manual, verbal forms A & B. Scholastic Testing Service.
- Treffinger, D. J., & Isaksen, S. G. (1992). Creative problem solving: An introduction. Center for Creative Learning.
- Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Blackwell.
- van Knippenberg, D., & Schippers, M. C. (2007). Work group diversity. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 515-541. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085546
- van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Homan, A. C. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 1008-1022. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.1008
- Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. Cape.
- Wang, H.-C. (2019). Fostering learner creativity in the English L2 classroom: Application of the creative problem-solving model. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 58-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.11.005
- Weisberg, R. W. (2006). Creativity: Understanding innovation in problem solving, science, invention, and the arts. Wiley.
- Williams, F. E. (1970). Classroom ideas for encouraging thinking and feeling (2nd ed.). D.O.K.
- Wu, C.-C., Chen, F.-Y., Kuo, C.-H., Lin, W.-W., Liu, S.-H., & Chen, Y.-H. (1999). The newly developed creativity thinking test: A research report for the Ministry of Education’s six-year student counseling program. Foundation for Scholarly Exchange.
- Wu, H.-C., & Pan, Y.-F. (2007). A study of the effects of the thematic integrated instruction on creativity, problem solving abilities and academic achievements for elementary students. Journal of Gifted Education, 7(2), 71-101. https://doi.org/10.7089/JGE.200712.0071
- Yoon, H., Woo, A. J., Treagust, D. F., & Chandrasegaran, A. L. (2015). Second-year college students’ scientific attitudes and creative thinking ability: Influence of a problem-based learning (PBL) chemistry laboratory course. In M. Kahveci & M. Orgill (Eds.), Affective dimensions in chemistry education (pp. 217-233). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45085-7_11
- Yu, C.-H. (2003). A study of the effects of the de Bono’s CoRT Program on primary school gifted students’ linguistic creativity. Gifted Education Forum, 3(2), 37-63.
- Yu, H.-J. (2015). The effect of using creative thinking teaching in life curriculum on the elementary students’ creativity. Forum of Education Research, 6(2), 183-206.
Journal directory listing - Volume 66 (2021) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【66(3)】September
Directory
Designing a Vocational High School Instructional Program for Enhancing Creativity: Effects on Creative Thinking and Group Process Analysis
Author: Hsiu-Ling Chen (Graduate Institute of Digital Learning and Education, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology), Po-Sheng Huang (Graduate Institute of Digital Learning and Education, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology), Chu-Yun Su (Graduate Institute of Digital Learning and Education, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology)
Vol.&No.：Vol. 66, No. 3
Date：September 2021
Pages：279-303
DOI：https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202109_66(3).0009
Abstract：
Teaching students the ability to think creatively can improve a country’s continuity and prosperity. However how strategies for teaching creative thinking can be efficiently applied remains unclear. This study examined the effect of a 9-week creativity curriculum on the creative thinking ability of students in an engineering program at a vocational high school. A nonequivalent, quasi-experimental design was employed. A total of 85 students were assigned to an experimental group of 41 or a control group of 44. The students in the experimental group scored significantly higher in all aspects of creative thinking ability, namely, fluency, flexibility, originality, and elaboration. The creative thinking curriculum yielded positive results; the emergent themes in the creative process included: (1) curriculum characteristics, (2) group dynamics, and (3) constraining conditions. The results imply that this 9-week creativity curriculum is efficient and can be incorporated into future research on engineering education or creative thinking.
Keywords：creative thinking ability, creative thinking instruction, divergent thinking, process analysis, vocational high school