我國公立頂尖大學財務分析
作者:國立高雄科技大學師資培育中心林宜樺、國立臺灣師範大學教育學系許添明
卷期:68卷第1期
日期:2023年3月
頁碼:109-135
DOI:https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202303_68(1).0004
摘要:
我國公立大學實施校務基金目的係為提升自籌財源與吸收社會資源成效,其中又以公立頂尖大學的財務運作備受關注。基於各公立頂尖大學在學術領域、政府政策期待與經費挹注的差異,本研究區分為國立臺灣大學、綜合型頂尖大學I(國立成功大學、國立清華大學、國立交通大學)、綜合型頂尖大學II(國立中央大學、國立中興大學、國立中山大學)與文法商頂尖大學(國立政治大學、國立臺灣師範大學)等四類,透過次級資料研究法,以各公立頂尖大學「2016年至2019年」決算進行跨類型分析比較,有助於彼此尋求更佳的財務運作方式。研究發現:一、公立頂尖大學自籌收入逐年提升,政府專案補助仍持續增加;二、理工醫為重的公立頂尖大學更有利發展建教合作,惟主要來源是政府;三、文法商頂尖大學善於結合特長經營在職專班,提高學雜費收入;四、文法商頂尖大學善用軟、硬體資源增加場地設備管理與推廣教育收入有成;五、國立臺灣大學與綜合型頂尖大學I更積極經營受贈收入與投資取得收益;六、自籌收入受學術領域、地理位置、經營策略影響,更與善用優勢特性有關。最後,並依據研究結果提出對我國政府與公立頂尖大學財務運作之建議。
關鍵詞:公立頂尖大學、自籌收入、政府補助、校務基金、高等教育財政
《詳全文》
參考文獻:
- 毛建青、朱思穎(2020)。世界一流大學支出規模和結構的實證研究─基於30所美國大學2013-2017財年的財務數據。現代教育管理,3,13-19。https://doi.org/10.16697/j.1674-5485. 2020.03.003【Mao, J.-Q., & Zhu, S.-Y. (2020). Challenges, transcendence and excellence of higher education in Taiwan ─ According to the data of 30 world-class universities in the 2013-2017 fiscal year. Modern Education Management, 3, 13-19. https://doi.org/10.16697/j.1674-5485.2020.03.003】
- 中華民國統計網(2021)。消費者物價指數及其年增率。https://www.stat.gov.tw/ct.asp?CtNode= 487&mp=4&xItem=35375【National Statistics, R. O. C. (2021). Consumer price index and annual growth rate. https://www.stat.gov.tw/ct.asp? CtNode=487&mp=4&xItem=35375】
- 立法院(1995)。立法院第2屆第5會期第11次會議議案關係文書(院總第1685號政府提案第5171號)。https://lis.ly.gov.tw/lgcgi/lgmeetimage?cfcdcfcacfc6cfcfc5cac8d2c9cd【Legislative Yuan. (1995). Proceedings of 11st meeting, 5nd legislative period, 2th legislation committee (Proposal No. 5171, Yuan General Directory No. 1685). https://lis.ly.gov.tw/lgcgi/lgmeetimage?cfcdcfcacfc6cfcfc5cac8d 2c9cd】
- 立法院(1997)。立法院第3屆第4會期第26次會議議案關係文書(院總第1685號,政府提案第5171號之1)。https://lis.ly.gov.tw/ttscgi/lgimg?@xdd!cec9cdccccc6cbcfcfc881c7c7cfc9cfcec 4cfcec9c9c4cfcec8ca【Legislative Yuan. (1997). Proceedings of 26st meeting, 4nd legislative period, 3th legislation committee (Proposal No. 5171-1, Yuan General Directory No. 1685). https://lis.ly.gov.tw/ttscgi/lgimg?@xdd!cec9cdccccc6cbcfcfc 881c7c7cfc9cfcec4cfcec9c9c4cfcec8ca】
- 技術及職業教育法(2019)。【Technical and Vocational Education Act (2019).】
» 展開更多
- 毛建青、朱思穎(2020)。世界一流大學支出規模和結構的實證研究─基於30所美國大學2013-2017財年的財務數據。現代教育管理,3,13-19。https://doi.org/10.16697/j.1674-5485. 2020.03.003【Mao, J.-Q., & Zhu, S.-Y. (2020). Challenges, transcendence and excellence of higher education in Taiwan ─ According to the data of 30 world-class universities in the 2013-2017 fiscal year. Modern Education Management, 3, 13-19. https://doi.org/10.16697/j.1674-5485.2020.03.003】
- 中華民國統計網(2021)。消費者物價指數及其年增率。https://www.stat.gov.tw/ct.asp?CtNode= 487&mp=4&xItem=35375【National Statistics, R. O. C. (2021). Consumer price index and annual growth rate. https://www.stat.gov.tw/ct.asp? CtNode=487&mp=4&xItem=35375】
- 立法院(1995)。立法院第2屆第5會期第11次會議議案關係文書(院總第1685號政府提案第5171號)。https://lis.ly.gov.tw/lgcgi/lgmeetimage?cfcdcfcacfc6cfcfc5cac8d2c9cd【Legislative Yuan. (1995). Proceedings of 11st meeting, 5nd legislative period, 2th legislation committee (Proposal No. 5171, Yuan General Directory No. 1685). https://lis.ly.gov.tw/lgcgi/lgmeetimage?cfcdcfcacfc6cfcfc5cac8d 2c9cd】
- 立法院(1997)。立法院第3屆第4會期第26次會議議案關係文書(院總第1685號,政府提案第5171號之1)。https://lis.ly.gov.tw/ttscgi/lgimg?@xdd!cec9cdccccc6cbcfcfc881c7c7cfc9cfcec 4cfcec9c9c4cfcec8ca【Legislative Yuan. (1997). Proceedings of 26st meeting, 4nd legislative period, 3th legislation committee (Proposal No. 5171-1, Yuan General Directory No. 1685). https://lis.ly.gov.tw/ttscgi/lgimg?@xdd!cec9cdccccc6cbcfcfc 881c7c7cfc9cfcec4cfcec9c9c4cfcec8ca】
- 技術及職業教育法(2019)。【Technical and Vocational Education Act (2019).】
- 林日清、石倉安(2018)。邁向頂尖大學計畫執行情形之審計。政府審計季刊,30(2),21-34。【Lin, R.-Q., & Shih, C.-A. (2018). Audit of execution of aim for top university project. Government Audit Journal, 30(2), 21-34.】
- 國立大學校院校務基金會計制度之一致規定(2019)。【National University Academic Fund Establishment Regulations (2019).】
- 國立大學校院校務基金設置條例(2015)【National University Endowment Fund Establishment Act (2015).】
- 國家重點領域產學合作及人才培育創新條例(2021)【National Key Fields Industry-University Cooperation and Skilled Personnel Training (2021).】
- 教育部(2005)。發展國際一流大學及頂尖研究中心計畫。http://english.moe.gov.tw/dl-4905- ACA80C49-5257-47E0-BD71-9C1CCBB78D3D.html【Ministry of Education. (2005). Development plan for world class universities and research centers of excellence. http://english.moe.gov.tw/dl-4905-ACA80C49-5257-47E0-BD71-9C1CCBB78D3D.html】
- 教育部(2014)。邁向頂尖大學計畫期中考評結果與新申請學校審議結果公布。https://depart. moe.edu.tw/ed2200/News_Content.aspx?n=90774906111B0527&s=BA25383ABEF34933&sms=F0EAFEB716DE7FFA【Ministry of Education. (2014). Announcement of mid-term assessment results and new application school review results of aim for top university project. https://depart.moe.edu.tw/ed2200/News_Content.aspx?n=90774906111 B0527&s=BA25383ABEF34933&sms=F0EAFEB716DE7FFA】
- 教育部(2018)。高等教育深耕計畫審查結果公布。https://www.edu.tw/News_Content.aspx?n= 9E7AC85F1954DDA8&s=8365C4C9ED53126D【Ministry of Education. (2018). Higher education sprout project announcement of review results. https://www.edu. tw/News_Content.aspx?n=9E7AC85F1954DDA8&s=8365C4C9ED53126D】
- 教育部(2020a)。大專校院學科標準分類。https://stats.moe.gov.tw/bcode【Ministry of Education. (2020a). Standard classification of subjects. https://stats.moe.gov.tw/bcode/】
- 教育部(2020b)。國立學校財務報表。https://udb.moe.edu.tw/udata/DetailReportList/%E8%B2% A1%E5%8B%99%E9%A1%9E/AccountingFinanceUrl/Index【Ministry of Education. (2020b). National school financial statement. https://udb.moe.edu.tw/udata/DetailReport List/%E8%B2%A1%E5%8B%99%E9%A1%9E/AccountingFinanceUrl/Index】
- 教育部(2020c)。大專校院概況統計(105學年度至108學年度)。https://depart.moe.edu.tw/ ed4500/News_Content.aspx?n=48EBDB3B9D51F2B8&sms=F78B10654B1FDBB5&s=4396A90696381274【Ministry of Education. (2020c). Statistics of tertiary institutions (2016-2019). https://depart.moe.edu.tw/ed4500/News_Content.aspx?n=48EBDB3B9D51F2B8&sms=F78B10654B1FDBB5&s=4396A90696381274】
- 教育部(2020d)。學校承接各單位資助「各類計畫經費」及其每師平均承接金額─以「校」統計。https://udb.moe.edu.tw/udata/DetailReportList/%E7%A0%94%E7%A9%B6%E9%A1%9E【Ministry of Education. (2020d). School accepts funding from project funds and average amount accepted by each teacher. https://udb.moe.edu.tw/udata/DetailReportList/%E7%A0%94%E7%A9%B6%E9%A1%9E】
- 教育部(2020e)。109年版教育統計指標之國際比較。https://stats.moe.gov.tw/files/ebook/ International_Comparison/2020/i2020.pdf【Ministry of Education. (2020e). 2020 International comparison of education statistics indicators. https://stats.moe. gov.tw/files/ebook/International_Comparison/2020/i2020.pdf】
- 教育部(2020f)。正式學籍在學學生人數─以「系(所)」統計。https://udb.moe.edu.tw/udata/DetailReportList/%E5%AD%B8%E7%94%9F%E9%A1%9E/StatStudent/Index【Ministry of Education. (2020f). Number of formal students ─ Statistics based on departments. https://udb.moe. edu.tw/udata/DetailReportList/%E5%AD%B8%E7%94%9F%E9%A1%9E/StatStudent/Index】
- 教育部(2021)。學雜費歷年調幅及占平均每人國內生產毛額之比率。http://stats.moe.gov.tw/files/important/OVERVIEW_U17.pdf【Ministry of Education. (2021). Tuition and fees adjustment over the years and the ratio of gross domestic product per capita. http://stats.moe.gov.tw/files/important/OVERVIEW_U17.pdf】
- 許添明(2009)。躋身國際一流大學之財務策略─以美國大學為例。當代教育研究,17(2),103-148。https://doi.org/10.6151/CERQ.2009.1702.04【Sheu, T.-M. (2009). Becoming a world-class university: From the US universities’ financial perspective. Contemporary Educational Research Quarterly, 17(2), 103-148. https://doi.org/10.6151/CERQ.2009.1702.04】
- 許添明、但昭偉、卯靜儒、陳佩英(2008)。「邁向一流大學」關注面向與執行策略。載於彭森明(主編),高等教育質的提升:反思與前瞻(頁28-92)。國立臺灣師範大學教育評鑑與發展中心。【Sheu, T.-M., Tan, C.-W., Mao, C.-J., & Chen, P.-Y. (2008). The orientation and execution strategies of becoming a world-class university. In S.-M. Peng (Eds.), Improving the quality of higher education: Reflection and prospect (pp. 28-92). Center for Educational Research and Evaluation, National Taiwan Normal University.】
- 陳麗珠、陳河開(2013)。我國國立大學收支型態之分析。台灣教育,681,13-24。【Chen, L.-J., & Chen, H.-K. (2013). Analysis of the income and expenditure patterns of national universities in Taiwan. Taiwan Education Review, 681, 13-24.】
- 喻愷、徐揚、查嵐(2015)。轉危為機:世界一流大學在國際金融危機中的應對策略。知識產權。【Yu, K., Xu, Y., & Zha, L. (2015). Turning crisis into opportunity: The coping strategies of world-class universities in the international financial crisis. Intellectual Property.】
- 楊朝祥(2009)。臺灣高等教育的挑戰、超越與卓越。教育資料集刊,44,1-28。【Yang, C.-H. (2009). Challenges, transcendence and excellence of higher education in Taiwan. Bulletin of the National Institute of Education Materials, 44, 1-28.】
- 葉怡芬(2017)。高等教育經費補助政策與績效分析:以臺灣公立大學與頂尖大學為例。教育科學研究期刊,62(4),53-88。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.2017.62(4).03【Yeh, Y.-F. (2017). Efficiency analysis of subsidiary and grant policy in public universities and top universities in Taiwan. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 62(4), 53-88. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.2017.62(4).03】
- 監察院(2017)。106教調0021調查報告。https://www.cy.gov.tw/CyBsBoxContent.aspx?n=133&s =5660【Control Yuan. (2017). 2017 education investigation 0021 investigation report. https://www.cy.gov.tw/CyBsBox Content.aspx?n=133&s=5660】
- 蓋浙生(2006)。大學商機—臺灣大學校院財源籌措的新策略。教育研究集刊,52(2),67-93。【Ge, C.-S. (2006). Generating more revenues for universities: New strategic plans for higher education fund raising in Taiwan. Bulletin of Educational Research, 52(2), 67-93.】
- 戴曉霞(2006)。世界一流大學之卓越與創新。高等教育。【Tai, H.-H. (2006). The massification and marketization of higher education. Higher Education.】
- 簡禎富、侯建良、吳建瑋、林國義、胡益芬、朱珮君(2017)。推動高等教育校務經營全面品質管理之研究─以國立清華大學為實證。管理與系統,24(4),591-614。https://doi. org/10.29416/JMS.201710_24(4).0005【Chien, C.-F., Hou, J.-L., Wu, C.-W., Lin, K.-Y., Hu, Y.-F., & Chu, P.-C. (2017). Investigation of total quality management in higher education institutional research: An empirical study of national Tsing Hua University. Journal of Management and Systems, 24(4), 591-614. https://doi.org/10.29416/JMS.201710_24(4).0005】
- Altbach, P. G., & Salmi, J. (2011). The road to academic excellence: The making of world-class research universities. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-8805-1
- Barr, M. J., & McClellan, G. S. (2018). Budgets and financial management in higher education. John Wiley & Sons.
- Chen, S., Yang, C., & Shiau, J. (2006). The application of balanced scorecard in the performance evaluation of higher education. TQM Management, 18(2), 190-205. https://doi.org/10.1108/09544780610647892
- Desrochers, D. M., & Hurlburt, S. (2016). Trends in college spending: 2003-2013. American Institutes for Research.
- Fu, T.-T., Sung, A.-D., See, K.-F., & Chou, K.-W. (2019). Do optimal scale and efficiency matter in Taiwan’s higher education reform? A stochastic cost frontier approach. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 67, 111-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2018.10.003
- Huang, F. (2016). Changes and challenges to higher education financing in Japan (Working Paper No. 10). https://www.researchcghe.org/perch/resoures/publications/wp10.pdf
- Jacob, W. J., & Gokbel, V. (2018). Global higher education learning outcomes and financial trends: Comparative and innovative approaches. International Journal of Educational Development, 58, 5-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.03.001
- Jacob, W. J., Mok, K. H., Cheng, S. Y., & Xiong, W. (2018). Changes in Chinese higher education: Financial trends in China, Hong Kong and Taiwan. International Journal of Educational Development, 58, 64-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.03.006
- Knight, J. (2006). Commercial cross border education: Implications for financing higher education. https://upcommons.upc.edu/bitstream/handle/2099/7307/2006-03_eng_knight.pdf?sequence=1& isAllowed=y
- Lee, M. H., & Gopinathan, S. (2003). Reforming university education in Hong Kong and Singapore. Higher Education Research & Development, 22(2), 167-182. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360304108
- Marginson, S. (2018). Global trends in higher education financing: The United Kingdom. International Journal of Educational Development, 58, 26-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev. 2017.03.008
- Mitchell, M., Leachman, M., & Masterson, K. (2017). A lost decade in higher education funding. https://www.cbpp.org/sites/default/files/atoms/files/2017_higher_ed_8-22-17_final.pdf
- National Association of College and University Business Officers. (2017). 2016 NACUBO-commonfund study of endowments. https://www.nacubo.org/Press-Releases/2016/2016%20NACUBO%20Commonfund%20Study%20of%20Endowments%20Final%20Data
- National Center for Education Statistics. (2021). Digest of education statistics 2019. https://nces. ed.gov/programs/digest/2019menu_tables.asp
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2020). Education at a glance 2020: OECD indicators. Author. https://doi.org/10.1787/69096873-en
- Rhee, B. S. (2011). A world-class research university on the periphery: The Pohang University of Science and Technology, the Republic of Korea. In P. G. Altbach & J. Salmi (Eds.), The road to academic excellence: The making of world-class research universities (pp. 101-128.). World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/9780821388051_CH04
- Sanyal, B. C., & Martin, M. (2006). Financing higher education: International perspectives. https://upcommons.upc.edu/bitstream/handle/2099/5942/2006-01_eng_sanyal_martin.pdf?sequence=7
Financial Analysis of the Top Public Universities in Taiwan
Author: Yi-Hua Lin (Center for Teacher Education, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology), Tian-Ming Sheu (Department of Education, National Taiwan Normal University)
Vol.&No.:Vol. 68, No. 1
Date:March 2023
Pages:109-135
DOI:https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202303_68(1).0004
Abstract:
1. Research Motivation and Purpose
Public universities in Taiwan have implemented endowment funds for more than 20 years. The main purpose of endowment funds is not only to relieve the government’s increasing financial burden but also to promote the universities’ ability to raise self-generated income and access social resources, which gradually facilitates the independent operations of university finances. As the top public universities in Taiwan strive to become world-class universities, the government has invested funds to finance their development and enhance their competitiveness. In addition, these universities implemented the endowment fund system and practiced financial autonomy early on. Therefore, whether the financial operations of these universities have fulfilled the expected policy objectives is of particular concern.
2. Literature Review
In the context of global higher education, the financial operations of countries have expanded, with rising costs in recent years. However, economic recession has caused the government to drastically cut funding for higher education universities. Consequently, to reduce internal operating costs, universities have been required to seek funding from the private sector and increase self-generated income through various means. Based on the universities’ self-generated income, the private sector and the government jointly provide funds in a fixed ratio; earn revenue through the diversified operation of hospitals, dormitories, sports fields, restaurants, bookstores, and other affiliated institutions; increase revenue through publishing royalties, examinations, business consulting services, and provision of online courses and selling of textbooks; increase tuition and miscellaneous fees to balance university costs; effectively utilize the universities’ academic research resources to implement brand management strategies for obtaining external capital; reinvest endowment funds; and other measures. Although public universities can undertake a wide range of projects for rains endowment funds, they are yet to attain financial independence because public universities still mainly rely on government subsidies, the standard of charging tuition and fees is strictly controlled, and donations or investments are not actively institutionalized, resulting in ineffective outcomes. Many such practices still need to be improved for universities to achieve financial independence.
3. Research Methods
Based on the differences in the development priorities of the top public universities in the academic field, the policy expectations, and the funding provided by the government, in this study, the top public universities were divided into four categories: National Taiwan University, comprehensive type I (National Cheng-Kung University, National Tsin-Hua University, and National Chioa-Tung University), comprehensive type II (National Central University, National Chung-Hsing University, and National Sun-Yat-sen University), and social science and business type (National Cheng-chi University and National Normal University). Through secondary data analysis, the items covered by the National University Endowment Fund Establishment Act were analyzed, including the government’s normal budget appropriations; universities’ self-generated income from tuition and other fees, continuing education, and academia-industry cooperation; government subsidies for scientific research or government commissions; site facility management income; and donation income and investment income. Cross-type analysis was conducted by reviewing the final accounts of top public universities from 2016 to 2019 and by comparing them with relevant government statistics and official reports. The results obtained are expected to assist top public universities in improving their financial operations.
4. Research Results
The purpose of the current study is to explore the effectiveness of the financial operations of top public universities through financial analysis. The following results are obtained: (1) The self-generated income of top public universities has increased every year, and the government subsidy also continues to increase; (2) top public universities with science, technology, and medicine as their main discipline cluster exhibit higher contributions to the development of academia-industry cooperation, but the government remains their main source of investment, with an extremely low rate of private sector investment; (3) top public universities of the social science and business type are more adept at increasing income from tuition and fees by using their in-service master’s program operation; (4) universities of the social science and business type efficiently utilize the school’s assets and implement continuing education to increase revenue; (5) National Taiwan University and comprehensive type I universities exhibit more active ability for donations and investment management; and (6) academic fields, regional factors, and business strategies affect the quantity of self-generated income, especially depending on whether universities can efficiently utilize their own resources. The results are expected to help top public universities improve their future financial operations as well as enhance the government’s research and development for formulating more effective higher education funding policies. Especially allow top public universities to directly correspond to reference operations.
5. Research Suggestions
According to the study results, the following policy recommendations for financial operations are proposed for the government and top public universities from a practical perspective: (1) Top public universities should efficiently increase student enrollment into academic courses to increase their income from tuition and miscellaneous fees. Moreover, the government should relax the standards and conditions for tuition and miscellaneous fees to facilitate financial autonomy of the school fund. (2) Top public universities should increase the industrial applicability of the research results and aim to obtain a greater proportion of private sector funding. (3) Top public universities should more actively develop diversified business strategies based on school attributes. (4) Top public universities should prioritize fundraising and investments and obtain incentives; this financial independence should improve their resilience. For future research, the government should expand on the current “public platform for college affairs information” and comprehensively collect and release the relevant financial data of each university to facilitate analysis in combination with other university affairs data and to elucidate the factors influencing university financial operations. In addition to data analysis, future research should qualitatively analyze business perspectives, organizational culture, decision-making processes, and other business strategies by examining actual cases.
Keywords:top public universities, self-generated income, government subsidies, endowment fund, higher education finance