期刊目錄列表 - 52卷(2007) - 【教育類】52(1) 四月刊
Directory

九年一貫課程數學領域能力指標「數與量」、「代數」主題軸第一、二階段表現標準適切性評估之研究
作者:杜佳真(中華技術學院通識教育中心)、林世華(國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系)

卷期:52卷第1期
日期:2007年4月
頁碼:63-85
DOI:10.3966/2073753X2007045201004

摘要:

本研究以九年一貫課程數學領域暫行綱要為例,利用Angoff(1971)所提出的表現標準設定程序和得懷術技術來評估由研究者重組之第一、二階段「數與量」和「代數」主題軸之數學基本能力表現標準的適切性。依據三階段程序進行,第一階段為準備階段,主要為學生實徵資料的收集和專家的邀集;第二階段為執行階段,主要進行三回合專家評估;第三階段為後續階段,主要以描述專家評估結果和收集專家回饋意見為主。經過15位專家代表進行3次評估問卷,結果發現:第一階段能力指標所指陳的學生表現標準較合乎我國學生的實徵結果,第二階段能力指標所指陳的表現標準較為簡單。

關鍵詞:表現標準設定程序、得懷術、數學領域表現標準

《詳全文》

中文APA引文格式杜佳真、林世華(2007)。九年一貫課程數學領域能力指標「數與量」、「代數」主題軸第一、二階段表現標準適切性評估之研究。師大學報:教育類52(1),63-85。doi:10.3966/2073753X2007045201004
APA FormatTu, C.-C., & Lin, S.-H. (2007). Evaluating the Applicability of Mathematics Performance Standards with a Competence Indicator System. Journal of National Taiwan Normal University: Education, 52(1), 63-85. doi:10.3966/2073753X2007045201004

Journal directory listing - Volume 52 (2007) - Education【52(1)】April
Directory

Evaluating the Applicability of Mathematics Performance Standards with a Competence Indicator System
Author: Chia-Chen Tu(Center for General Education, China Institute of Technology),Sieh-Hwa Lin(Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling, NTNU)

Vol.&No.:Vol. 52, No. 1
Date:April 2007
Pages:63-85
DOI:10.3966/2073753X2007045201004

Abstract:

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the Taiwanese students’ performance in math, specifically in regard to number/quantity and algebra. In order to complete the study the researchers used the Delphi method to set the performance standards.The process of setting performance standards consisted of three stages. Stage 1, the preparatory stage, where as in essential background information about the exam which the participants required to take was provided by 15 experts.Stage 2 was the modified stage, those experts modified their evaluations according to the students’ performance test. In stage 3, the final stage, the results of the evaluations were analyzed by the experts. The three separate evaluations demonstrated that the stage-one competence indicator was correlated with existing data we collected from our participants. In contrast, the result of the stage-two competence indicator did not correlate so closely with the performance standard.

Keywords:performance standard setting procedure, Delphi method, mathematical performance standards