期刊目錄列表 - 60卷(2015) - 【教育科學研究期刊】60(1) 三月刊
Directory

臺灣、美國與新加坡國中階段幾何教材內容之分析比較
作者:
楊德清(國立嘉義大學數理教育研究所)、鄭婷芸(嘉義市立北興國民中學)

卷期:60卷第1期
日期:2015年3月
頁碼:33-72
DOI:10.6209/JORIES.2015.60(1).02

摘要:

本研究採內容分析法以比較臺灣「康軒數學」、美國「連結數學」與新加坡「新課程數學」在國中階段幾何教材總題數、佈題方式與表徵型態,以及幾何內容特色之差異。結果顯示:三套教科書在幾何教材總題數具顯著差異性,美國「連結數學」之幾何總題數顯著多於臺灣「康軒數學」與新加坡「新課程數學」。三套教科書在佈題方式亦有差異;美國「連結數學」有將近三分之一的問題屬開放型問題,但是「康軒數學」與「新課程數學」兩套教材之幾何題目安排高達九成五以上皆為封閉型問題。三套教材在表徵型態方面,以「聯合型態問題」與「文字型態問題」部分所占比例最高,約有七至八成以上。研究亦發現,三套教材在幾何主題內容有部分差異,且三套教材亦各有其特色。最後,期望本研究之發現,可提供未來數學教科書設計之參考。

關鍵詞:國中階段、連結數學、幾何、新課程數學

《詳全文》 檔名

參考文獻:
    1. 左台益、梁勇能(2001)。國二學生空間能能力與van Hiele幾何思考層次相關性研究。師大學報:科學教育類,46(1, 2),1-20。doi:10.6300/JNTNU.2001.46.01【Tso, T.-Y., & Liang, Y.-N. (2001). The study of interrelationship between spatial abilities and van Hiele levels of thinking in geometry of eighth-grade students. Journal of National Taiwan Normal University: Science Education, 46(1, 2), 1-20. doi:10.6300/JNTNU.2001.46.01】
    2. 吳德邦、馬秀蘭、藍同利(2006)。小青的三角形概念-從Duval理論的觀點探究一位國小五年級視覺型兒童之個案研究。科學教育研究與發展季刊,42,78-116。【Wu, D.-B., Ma, S.-L., & Lan, T.-L. (2006). A study of the cognitive development of visual type child on triangle conception in geometry-Analysis from the viewpoint of duval theory. Research and Development in Science Education, 42, 78-116.】
    3. 徐偉民、林美如(2009)。台灣、中國與香港國小數學教科書幾何教材之內容分析。彰化師大教育學報,16,49-75。【Shiu, W.-M., & Lin, M.-R. (2009). The content analysis of geometry material in the elementary mathematic textbooks of Taiwan, Chinese and Hong Kong. Journal of Education National Changhua University of Education, 16, 49-75.】
    4. 康軒文教事業(主編)(2009a)。康軒國中數學課本(第三冊)。臺北市:康軒文教集團。【Kang Hsuan Educational Publishing Group. (Ed.). (2009a). KH middle school mathematics textbooks (Vol. III). Taipei, Taiwan: Author.】
    5. 康軒文教事業(主編)(2009b)。康軒國中數學課本(第四冊)。臺北市:康軒文教集團。【Kang Hsuan Educational Publishing Group. (Ed.). (2009a). KH middle school mathematics textbooks (Vol. IV). Taipei, Taiwan: Author.】
» 展開更多
中文APA引文格式
楊德清、鄭婷芸(2015)。臺灣、美國與新加坡國中階段幾何教材內容之分析比較。教育科學研究期刊60(1),33-72。doi:10.6209/JORIES.2015.60(1).02
APA Format
Yang, D.-C., & Cheng, T.-Y. (2015). Geometry Content of Middle School Textbooks in Taiwan, the United States, and Singapore. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 60(1), 33-72. doi:10.6209/JORIES.2015.60(1).02

Journal directory listing - Volume 60 (2015) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【60(1)】March
Directory

Geometry Content of Middle School Textbooks in Taiwan, the United States, and Singapore
Author:
Der-Ching Yang(Graduate Institute of Mathematics and Science Education, National Chiayi University), Ting-Yun Cheng(Chiayi City Pei Shin Public Junior High School)

Vol.&No.:Vol. 60, No. 1
Date:March 2015
Pages:33-72
DOI:10.6209/JORIES.2015.60(1).02

Abstract:

This study applied the content analysis method to compare the differences in the geometry problems, problem-posing methods, representational types, and characteristics of geometry content of middle school mathematics textbooks among Kang Hsuan (KH) in Taiwan, Connected Mathematics Program (CMP) in the United States, and New Syllabus Mathematics (NSM) in Singapore. The results reveal significant differences in the total geometry problems and problem-posing methods among the three textbooks. The CMP included approximately one-third open-ended problems; however, the KH and NSM textbooks included more than 95% closed-ended problems. Regarding representation types, all three textbooks presented combined problems and verbal problems. In addition, the results show that the three textbooks have different characteristics. The findings of this study can serve as a reference for designing mathematics textbooks in the future.

Keywords:middle school, Connected Mathematics Program, geometry, New Syllabus Mathematics