期刊目錄列表 - 60卷(2015) - 【教育科學研究期刊】60(3) 九月刊
Directory

大學生自身技術之研究:研究工具編製與類型建構
作者:郭丁熒(國立臺南大學教育學系)

卷期:60卷第3期
日期:2015年9月
頁碼:27-62
DOI:10.6209/JORIES.2015.60(3).02

摘要:
本研究旨在探討自身技術之意涵、發展評量大學生自身技術之工具,並建構大學生自身技術類型。透過文獻探討、半結構訪談,擬訂大學生自身技術量表,經專家審查,並以452位大學生為預試樣本進行試探性因素分析,再以1,361位大學生為正式樣本,進行驗證性因素分析。研究結論有:一、本研究量表之效度、信度頗佳,二階因素分析顯示模式尚稱適配;二、大學生自身技術包含鍛鍊、告解坦白、問題化、自我檢查、對話辯證、說真話、越界體驗、節制、觀察等九類。與Foucault所提之自身技術相較,臺灣大學生自身技術新增觀察一類,而無傾聽一類,可能與網路世代及文化差異有關。
 

關鍵詞:大學生、自身、自身技術

《詳全文》 檔名

參考文獻:
    1. 何乏筆(2003a)。從性史到修養史:論傅柯《性史》第二卷中的四元架構。載於黃瑞琪(主編),後學新論(pp. 75-106)。臺北市:左岸文化。【Heubel, Fabian (2003a). From the history of sexuality to the history of self-cultivation: The theoretical structure of Foucault’s history of sexuality II. In R. R.-C. Hwang (Ed.), New essays on postism (pp. 75-106). Taipei, Taiwan: Rive Gauche.】
    2. 何乏筆(2003b)。自我發現與自我創造:關於哈道特和傅柯修養論之差異。載於黃瑞琪(主編),後學新論(pp. 47-73)。臺北市:左岸文化。【Heubel, Fabian (2003b). Self-discovery and self-creation: On the difference between Hadot’s and Foucault’s concept of self-cultivation. In R. R.-C. Hwang (Ed.), New essays on postism (pp. 47-73). Taipei, Taiwan: Rive Gauche.】
    3. 吳秀瑾(2002)。傅科和布爾迪厄身體觀之比較。取自http://www.csat.org.tw/csa/year2002/papers %5CFoucault4_2.doc【Wu, S.-C. (2002). Corporeal perspective between Foucault and Bourdieu. Retrieved from http://www.csat.org.tw/ csa/year2002/papers%5CFoucault4_2.doc】
    4. 林生傳(2003)。教育研究法。臺北市:心理。【Lin, S.-C. (2003). Education research. Taipei, Taiwan: Psychology.】
    5. 邱皓政(2011)。結構方程模式:LISREL/SIMPLIS原理與應用。臺北市:雙葉書廊。【Chiou, H.-J. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling with LISEL/SIMPLIS. Taipei, Taiwan: Yeh Yeh Book Gallery.】
» 展開更多
中文APA引文格式郭丁熒(2015)。大學生自身技術之研究:研究工具編製與類型建構。教育科學研究期刊60(3),27-62。doi:10.6209/JORIES.2015.60(3).02
APA FormatGuo, D.-Y. (2015). Undergraduates’ Technologies of the Self: Inventory and Taxonomy. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 60(3), 27-62. doi:10.6209/JORIES.2015.60(3).02

Journal directory listing - Volume 60 (2015) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【60(3)】September
Directory

Undergraduates’ Technologies of the Self: Inventory and Taxonomy
Author: Ding-Ying Guo(Department of Education, National University of Tainan)

Vol.&No.:Vol. 60, No. 3
Date:September 2015
Pages:27-62
DOI:10.6209/JORIES.2015.60(3).02

Abstract:

This study explores the meaning of “technologies of the self” and develops an inventory to identify and measure undergraduates’ technologies of the self. The inventory was proposed according to a literature review, semistructured interviews, expert review, exploratory factor analysis involving 452 undergraduates, and confirmatory factor analysis involving 1,361 undergraduates. The conclusions of this study are as follows: (1) The validity and reliability of the inventory developed are favorable, and the fitness of the model is acceptable according to second-order confirmatory factor analysis. (2) Nine categories of undergraduates’ technologies of the self are Exercise, Confession, Problematization, Self-examination, Dialog, Parrhesia, Transgressive experience, Moderation, and Observation. Unlike the technologies of the self proposed by Foucault, Taiwanese undergraduates reveal a new category of observation and do not exhibit the category of Listening. These discrepancies may result from cultural differences between Taiwan and Europe as well as computer networks in the Net Generation.

Keywords:undergraduate, self, technologies of the self