期刊目錄列表 - 71卷(2026) - 【教育科學研究期刊】71(2)六月刊

以設計本位研究法發展一門大一全英語必修課程:教材之選擇與應用
作者:
國立臺灣師範大學課程與教學研究所唐淑華國立臺灣師範大學師資培育學院楊松諺國立臺灣師範大學課程與教學研究所黃翊忠

卷期:71卷第2期
日期:2026年6月
頁碼:137-170
DOI:https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202606_71(2).0005

摘要:

  儘管全英語課程(English as a Medium of Instruction, EMI)已成為全球高等教育的發展趨勢,然而,EMI課程在臺灣之實施仍存在諸多挑戰。為了幫助大一學生有效掌握EMI學習方式,本研究旨在探討一門大一EMI必修課程的教材選用發展策略與修正歷程,嘗試透過可理解性輸入、跨語言實踐策略及多模態教材的融入,逐步發展教材輔助與應用策略。本研究採用設計本位研究法,經歷三個階段的設計,每一階段涵蓋「準備」、「設計」、「實施」與「修正」四個過程。研究結果顯示,經過三階段設計後,在教材選擇與輔助方面,發展出主題式文本選擇,並輔以多媒體導讀影片,可幫助學生更好地理解教材內容;在教材應用方面,亦發展出課前、課中、課後多項策略,以深化學生學習。最後,本研究於結論與建議中反思研究歷程,並提出對未來研究與教學的實務建議。

關鍵詞:

全英語教材選擇與應用、全英語課程、多模態學習、設計本位研究法、跨語言實踐策略

《詳全文》 檔名

參考文獻:
林秀娟(2021)。在臺灣英語文課程使用英語授課:理論與實踐。國立臺灣師範大學雙語教學研究中心。
【Lin, H.-C. (2021). Teaching English through English in Taiwan: Theory & practice. NTNU Bilingual Education Research Center.】
沈毓敏(2003,5月)。大專院校學生英文原文書閱讀障礙因素之探討(研討會論文)。2003年全國英語教學學術研討會,雲林縣,臺灣。
【Shen, Y.-M. (2003, May). An investigation into factors affecting college students’ reading difficulties with English textbooks [Paper presentation]. The meeting of the 2003 National Conference on English Teaching and Learning, Yunlin, Taiwan.】
周宛青(2018)。高等教育全英語課堂教學個案研究。教學實踐與創新,1(1),155-191。https://doi.org/10.3966/261654492018030101004
【Chow, W.-C. (2018). English-medium instruction in higher education: A case study. Journal of Teaching Practice and Pedagogical Innovation, 1(1), 155-191. https://doi.org/10.3966/261654492018030101004】
周宛青(2025)。臺灣高等教育全英語教學的挑戰:學習者的心聲。臺灣教育研究期刊,6(1),73-109。
【Chow, W.-C. (2025). The challenges of English-medium instruction in Taiwanese higher education: Voices of learners. Journal of Taiwan Education Studies, 6(1), 73-109.】
翁穎哲、譚克平(2008)。設計研究法簡介及其在教育研究的應用範例。科學教育月刊,307,15-30。https://doi.org/10.6216/SEM.200804_(307).0003
【Weng, Y.-Z., & Tan, K.-P. (2008). Introduction to design-based research and its applications in educational research. Science Education Monthly, 307, 15-30. https://doi.org/10.6216/SEM.200804_(307).0003】
» 展開更多
中文APA引文格式
唐淑華楊松諺黃翊忠(2026)。以設計本位研究法發展一門大一全英語必修課程:教材之選擇與應用。教育科學研究期刊,71(2),137-170。
https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202606_71(2).0005
APA Format
Tang, S.-H., & Yang, S.-Y., & Huang, Y.-C. (2026). A Design-based Research Approach to Developing a Freshman EMI Compulsory Course: Selection and Application of Teaching Materials. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 71(2), 137-170.
https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202606_71(2).0005

Journal directory listing - Volume 71 (2026) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【71(2)】June

A Design-based Research Approach to Developing a Freshman EMI Compulsory Course: Selection and Application of Teaching Materials
Author:
Shu-Hua Tang (Graduate Institute of Curriculum and Instruction, National Taiwan Normal University), Sung-Yen Yang (School of Teacher Education, National Taiwan Normal University), Yichung Huang (Graduate Institute of Curriculum and Instruction, National Taiwan Normal University)

Vol.&No.:Vol. 71, No. 2
Date:June 2026
Pages:137-170
DOI:https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202606_71(2).0005

Abstract:

Research Motivation and Purpose
  As English as a Medium of Instruction (EMI) becomes central to global higher education, Taiwan’s Bilingual 2030 policy also aims to enhance students’ English proficiency and international competitiveness. However, implementing EMI presents considerable challenges, particularly for freshmen with limited English skills. This study seeks to explore the selection and application of teaching materials in a compulsory freshman EMI course, employing a design-based research (DBR) approach to iteratively improve instructional design and enhance student learning outcomes.
Literature Review
  Prior research highlights cognitive, linguistic, and emotional challenges in EMI contexts, including foreign language anxiety, limited comprehension of academic texts, and reduced classroom participation. Theoretical underpinnings include comprehensible input (Krashen, 1982), translanguaging (Cenoz & Gorter, 2021), multimodal learning (Lin, 2016), and flipped classroom strategies (Al-Samarraie et al., 2020). Teachers’ beliefs, material design, and focus on student needs are critical for EMI success.
Research Method
  The study employed a three-phase DBR framework, with each phase comprising preparation, design, implementation, and revision stages. Data were collected through student needs surveys, course evaluations, interviews, reflective journals, learning portfolios, and institutional course evaluations. The research team utilized coding, thematic analysis, and triangulation to ensure analytical rigor.
Research Results
Phase 1 (2022, Fall): 
- Preparation: Selected an open-access English textbook without Mandarin translation; 
- Design: Planned weekly topics and employed lecture-based methods; 
- Implementation: Provided pre-recorded videos and bilingual glossaries; 
- Revision: Added Mandarin explanations and simplified key concepts in slides after students reported comprehension difficulties. 
Phase 2 (2022, Spring): 
- Preparation: Introduced flipped learning and multimodal materials; 
- Design: Combined text annotations, videos, and local case examples; 
- Implementation: Delivered mixed-language guided videos and connected theory to local issues; 
- Revision: Reduced reading load, integrated student feedback, and encouraged reflective thinking.
Phase 3 (2023, Fall): 
- Preparation: Collaborated with a team to adopt a thematic, multimodal curriculum; 
- Design: Created online quizzes, student-led reading groups, and integrated AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT); 
- Implementation: Used simplified slides with visual cues and facilitated student-led discussions; 
- Revision: Uploaded lecture slides post-class, supported independent learning, and refined assignments based on student needs.
Discussion and Suggestions
  This study highlights that flexible material selection, multimodal resources, and translanguaging strategies effectively reduce students’ cognitive overload and enhance engagement in EMI classrooms. Through continuous reflection and collaboration, the teaching team designed a course that helped students gradually progress from dependence on scaffolds toward greater autonomy in learning.
  To build on these findings, several suggestions are offered. First, instructors should carefully select thematic, multimodal, and locally relevant materials that align with students’ needs and interests. Providing bilingual scaffolding and clear explanations of key concepts is essential to support comprehension. Incorporating flipped classroom approaches and collaborative tasks can further foster active student engagement and participation. Additionally, integrating generative AI tools, such as ChatGPT, offers new opportunities for enhancing learning interactions and deepening understanding. Prioritizing teacher professional development in EMI pedagogy remains critical for sustaining high-quality instruction. Finally, future research should explore the long-term impacts of these strategies on students’ language proficiency, disciplinary knowledge, and their ability to become autonomous learners.
Limitations and Contributions
  Since this study focused solely on a first-year compulsory course related to education, the findings may not be generalizable to EMI courses in other colleges or universities. In particular, this research primarily concentrated on the selection and application of teaching materials; therefore, topics such as course design or pedagogical approaches fall outside the study’s scope and represent its limitations. Future studies could explore various intervention strategies tailored to EMI courses across different disciplines, student year levels, and subject characteristics.
  Nonetheless, as this study adopted a design-based research approach to examine the selection, support, and application of course materials, it yielded two main contributions through its three-phase process:
  Firstly, we shifted from using a full English-language textbook to a theme-based course design, emphasizing quality over quantity to reduce students’ cognitive load. This approach effectively integrated reading materials, alleviated reading pressure, and enhanced learning outcomes by promoting the understanding of core concepts. To support learning, we replaced audio-based previews with multimedia videos that included visual aids and highlighted key points. This combination of visual and auditory elements facilitated intuitive comprehension and further improved learning outcomes.
  Secondly, the study recommends that EMI instructors implement supportive strategies before, during, and after class to enhance students’ comprehension of course materials. For instance, assessing students’ preparedness for asynchronous self-study can encourage independent thinking and proactive questioning. Incorporating AI-assisted interactive design promotes higher-order thinking and metacognitive strategies, enabling instructors to tailor instruction to learners’ needs while fostering autonomy and critical thinking skills.
  In the classroom, lectures were divided into mini-lectures, each followed by interactive group discussions. These sessions provided opportunities for students to exchange ideas, reflect on the content, and raise questions, thereby deepening their understanding and preparing them for English oral expression. This approach fostered active engagement and deeper learning. Instructors also incorporated diverse formats such as role-plays and case studies to increase engagement and participation.
  Presentation materials were redesigned to incorporate multimodal resources and translanguaging strategies, enhancing both classroom interaction and content comprehension. By combining visual and auditory cues with Chinese annotations, students were better able to grasp key concepts and reduce anxiety related to English comprehension. Small group-led reading activities further built a sense of learning community and promoted peer interaction, increasing engagement and deepening understanding through shared discussions.
  For post-class assignments, we replaced the full-term learning portfolio with weekly reflection worksheets, which reduced the overall workload and clarified the weekly course structure. This adjustment helped students better organize the course content and supported knowledge retention through structured review and reflection.
  While these findings provide valuable insights for EMI instruction, the research team recommends further exploration of instructional materials and learning supports. For example, a multimedia repository or website with organized content by topic or unit– featuring guided previews and summaries– could help students access and use relevant materials more efficiently. Generative AI could also be used to produce practice questions, quizzes, and summaries to support students’ comprehension and retention. In addition, AI could generate differentiated texts based on learners’ proficiency levels, enabling personalized learning paths within EMI contexts.
  Future practices should aim to further integrate multimedia tools to encourage self-directed learning and incorporate task-based activities with built-in feedback mechanisms to increase engagement. Exploring real-time feedback systems may also enhance teacher-student interaction and provide scaffolding for English language production. Finally, assessment strategies should be continuously refined based on student feedback and learning outcomes to ensure ongoing improvement in instructional quality.

Keywords:

the selection and application of EMI teaching material, English as a Medium of Instruction (EMI), multimodal learning, design-based research, translanguaging strategy