期刊目錄列表 - 58卷(2013) - 【教育科學研究期刊】58(1) 三月刊

Plato《 理想國 》與Gilman《 她鄉 》烏托邦主張及教育思想比較研究 作者:方永泉(國立臺灣師範大學教育學系)

卷期:58卷第1期
日期:2013年3月
頁碼:1-27
DOI:10.3966/2073753X2013035801001

摘要:

本研究主要以Plato《理想國》與二十世紀C. P. Gilman《她鄉》作為探究對象,並比較分析兩者烏托邦主張及教育思想之異同。兩者均為歷史中重要的烏托邦及教育思想文獻,也有類似共產社會的觀點,然而,兩者設定烏托邦之基本原則及所呈現出來的教育風貌卻大相逕庭。本研究採文獻分析方法,探討並比較了兩人的烏托邦教育思想,並且闡發了烏托邦在現代社會中教育的重要性。研究結論如下:一、在現代社會中,具備「反偶像崇拜傳統」精神的烏托邦主義,可能才是烏托邦真正精神之所在;二、比起理念論式的「靜態烏托邦」,現代社會中吾人需對演化論式的「動態烏托邦」投以更多關注;三、Plato與Gilman欲培養之女性形象可說幾無二致,但兩者最大不同之處在於對於「母性」或「母職」的看法。Plato並未正視「母職」的重要性,但Gilman卻賦予「母職」最崇高地位。此一差異對我們重思教育定義可說極有意義。

關鍵詞:母職、《她鄉》、烏托邦、教育思想、《理想國》

《詳全文》 檔名

參考文獻:
  1. 王俊斌(2007)。潛能取向理論與教育公平性問題。教育與社會研究,13,41-70。【Wang, C.-B. (2007). Theory of capabilities approach and problems of education fairness. Formosan Education and Society, 13, 41-70.】
  2. 王恒(2008)。柏拉圖的「克里特遠征」-《法篇》與希臘帝國問題。上海市:人民出版社。【Wang, H. (2008). Plato’s expedition to Crete—The problems of “Law” and Greek empire. Shanghai, China: People’s Publishing House.】
  3. 林玉体(1984)。西洋教育史。臺北市:文景書局。【Lin, Y.-T. (1984). Western history of education. Taipei, Taiwan: Win-Join Book.】
  4. 曾桂娥(2009)。解構與建構-吉爾曼女權主義烏托邦研究(未出版博士論文)。上海外國語大學,上海市。【Zeng, G.-E (2009). Deconstruction and construction—A study of Charlotte Perkins Gilman’s feminist utopia (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Shanghai International Studies University, Shanghai, China.】
  5. 蔡聿文(2005)。從他鄉到她鄉─吉爾曼(C. P. Gilman)教育思想之研究(未出版碩士論文)國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。【Cai, Y.-W. (2005). From hisland to herland—The study of C. P. Gilman’s educational thought (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan.】
» 展開更多
中文APA引文格式方永泉(2013)。Plato《理想國》與Gilman《她鄉》烏托邦主張及教育思想比較研究。教育科學研究期刊58(1),1-27。doi:10.3966/2073753X2013035801001
APA FormatFang, Y.-C. (2013). Comparative Study of Utopian and Educational Thoughts Between Plato’s Republic and C. P. Gilman’s Herland. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 58(1), 1-27. doi:10.3966/2073753X2013035801001

Journal directory listing - Volume 58 (2013) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【58(1)】March

Comparative Study of Utopian and Educational Thoughts Between Plato’s Republic and C. P. Gilman’s Herland Author: Yung-Chuan Fang(Department of Education, National Taiwan Normal University)

Vol.&No.:Vol. 58, No. 1
Date:March 2013
Pages:1-27
DOI:10.3966/2073753X2013035801001

Abstract:

For this article, we mainly compare and analyze two important writings regarding “utopian” educational proposals: Plato’s Republic and C. P. Gilman’s feminist utopian novel Herland. They both are utopian and educational classics, and their ideal societies are both communist societies, but the basic organizing principles and educational proposals vary in numerous ways.
After reviewing the above-mentioned two utopian writings and other related studies, we summarize the study’s conclusion: (1) The utopian spirit of modern society should be utopianism consistent with the “iconoclastic utopian tradition”; (2) we require placing more attention on an evolutionary “dynamic utopia” than a theoretically “static utopia”; and (3) the female images that Plato and Gilman attempted to cultivate are similar, but their emphases on “motherhood” are of different degrees. Plato did not consider motherhood, but Gilman honored it as the most important social value, and we argue that such a difference is significant for people to reconsider the meaning of education.

Keywords:motherhood, Herland, utopia, educational thought, Republic