（專題）十二年國民基本教育的入學考試與評量變革
作者:宋曜廷(國立臺灣師範大學心理與教育測驗研究發展中心)、周業太(國立臺灣師範大學心理與教育測驗研究發展中心)、曾芬蘭(國立臺灣師範大學心理與教育測驗研究發展中心)
卷期：59卷第1期
日期：2014年3月
頁碼：1-32
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.2014.59(1).01
摘要：
十二年國民基本教育已正式啟動，入學考試和班級評量的變革，是影響十二年國民基本教育成敗的關鍵之一，如何達成所提出的願景，格外引人關注。以標準為本位的評量為近年來的教育評量改革趨勢，許多先進國家已將標準本位評量分別應用在教育會考與班級評量，以達到學力監控、提升教師教學與評量專業，並促進學生學習成果的目標。本研究介紹標準本位評量之意涵，並以國中教育會考與國民中學學生學習成就評量標準為例，說明標準本位評量如何為實施十二年國民基本教育創造有利環境，進而達成多元學習、確保學力、舒緩升學壓力、活化教學等目標。
關鍵詞：
十二年國民基本教育、班級評量、國中教育會考、國民中學學生學習成就評量標準、標準本位評量
《詳全文》
參考文獻：
- 吳清山、高家斌（2007）。臺灣中等教育改革分析：1994-2007年。教育資料集刊，34，1-24。【Wu, C.-S., & Kao, C.-P. (2007). The analysis on the reform of secondary education in Taiwan: 1994-2007. Bulletin of National Institute of Educational Resources and Research, 34, 1-24.】
- 宋曜廷（2012a）。以標準參照的入學考試和班級評量促進科教發展。科學月刊，43（9），672-678。【Sung, Y.-T. (2012a). Standards-referenced entrance examinations and classroom assessment for the promotion of science education. Science Monthly, 43(9), 672-678.】
- 宋曜廷（2012b，9月17日）。十二年國教的壓力與競爭力。中國時報，A12版。【Sung, Y.-T. (2012b, September 17). The pressure and competitiveness of 12-year basic education in Taiwan. The Chinatimes, p. A12.】
- 宋曜廷、周業太、吳佩璵、林秀珊、曾芬蘭（2010）。從學校本位評量省思臺灣擴大免試入學方案。教育科學研究期刊，55（2），73-113。doi:10.3966/2073753X2010065502003【Sung, Y.-T., Chou, Y.-T., Wu, P.-Y., Lin, H.-S., & Tseng, F.-L. (2010). A reflection of school-based assessment on the extended open admission program in Taiwan. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 55(2), 73-113. doi:10.3966/2073753X2010065502003】
- 宋曜廷、林世華、曾芬蘭（2013a）。國民中學學生學習成就評量標準（試行版）－語文學習領域（國文科）。取自http://140.122.106.29/chinese.pdf【Sung, Y.-T., Lin, S.-H., & Tseng, F.-L. (2013a). Standards-based assessment of student achievement handbook in Chinese language arts for junior high school. Retrieved from http://140.122.106.29/chinese.pdf】
» 展開更多
- 吳清山、高家斌（2007）。臺灣中等教育改革分析：1994-2007年。教育資料集刊，34，1-24。【Wu, C.-S., & Kao, C.-P. (2007). The analysis on the reform of secondary education in Taiwan: 1994-2007. Bulletin of National Institute of Educational Resources and Research, 34, 1-24.】
- 宋曜廷（2012a）。以標準參照的入學考試和班級評量促進科教發展。科學月刊，43（9），672-678。【Sung, Y.-T. (2012a). Standards-referenced entrance examinations and classroom assessment for the promotion of science education. Science Monthly, 43(9), 672-678.】
- 宋曜廷（2012b，9月17日）。十二年國教的壓力與競爭力。中國時報，A12版。【Sung, Y.-T. (2012b, September 17). The pressure and competitiveness of 12-year basic education in Taiwan. The Chinatimes, p. A12.】
- 宋曜廷、周業太、吳佩璵、林秀珊、曾芬蘭（2010）。從學校本位評量省思臺灣擴大免試入學方案。教育科學研究期刊，55（2），73-113。doi:10.3966/2073753X2010065502003【Sung, Y.-T., Chou, Y.-T., Wu, P.-Y., Lin, H.-S., & Tseng, F.-L. (2010). A reflection of school-based assessment on the extended open admission program in Taiwan. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 55(2), 73-113. doi:10.3966/2073753X2010065502003】
- 宋曜廷、林世華、曾芬蘭（2013a）。國民中學學生學習成就評量標準（試行版）－語文學習領域（國文科）。取自http://140.122.106.29/chinese.pdf【Sung, Y.-T., Lin, S.-H., & Tseng, F.-L. (2013a). Standards-based assessment of student achievement handbook in Chinese language arts for junior high school. Retrieved from http://140.122.106.29/chinese.pdf】
- 宋曜廷、林世華、曾芬蘭（2013b）。國民中學學生學習成就評量標準（試行版）－社會學習領域（地理科）。取自http://140.122.106.29/geography.pdf【Sung, Y.-T., Lin, S.-H., & Tseng, F.-L. (2013b). Standards-based assessment of student achievement handbook in social studies of geography for junior high school. Retrieved from http://140.122.106.29/geography.pdf】
- 宋曜廷、林世華、曾芬蘭（2013c）。國民中學學生學習成就評量標準（試行版）－研發說明與常見問題集。臺北市：作者。【Sung, Y.-T., Lin, S.-H., & Tseng, F.-L. (2013c). Standards-based assessment of student achievement handbook for junior high school. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.】
- 宋曜廷、邱佳民、張恬熒、曾芬蘭（2011）。以國中基本學力測驗成績探討學習成就落差。教育政策論壇，14（1），85-117。【Sung, Y.-T., Chiou, J.-M., Chang, T.-Y., & Tseng, F.-L. (2011). Investigating learning achievement gap through students’ basic competence test scores. Educational Policy Forum, 14(1), 85-117.】
- 宋曜廷、許福元、曾芬蘭、蔣莉蘋、孫維民（2007）。國民中學學生基本學力測驗的回顧與展望。教育研究與發展期刊，3（4），29-50。【Sung, Y.-T., Hsu, F.-Y., Tseng, F.-L., Chiang, L.-P., & Sun, W.-M. (2007). Basic competence test: A review and prospect. Journal of Educational Research and Development, 3(4), 29-50.】
- 宋曜廷、曾芬蘭、邱佳民（2013）。國中教育會考各科標準設定說明。載於國立臺灣師範大學心理與教育測驗研究發展中心舉辦之「2013第二屆標準本位評量國際研討會」論文集（pp. 143-152），臺北市。【Sung, Y.-T., Tseng, F.-L., & Chiou, J.-M. (2013). An explanation of the standard settings for each subject for the comprehensive assessment program for junior high school students. In Research Center for Psychological and Education Testing, National Taiwan Normal University (Ed.), “2013 International Conference of Standards- Based Assessment” symposium (pp. 143-152), Taipei, Taiwan.】
- 宋曜廷、趙子揚、王雅鈴、黃瓅瑩、陳佳蓉、曾芬蘭（2013）。「中學生考試壓力量表」之編製及其信度與效度之分析。測驗學刊，60（2），291-318。【Sung, Y.-T., Chao, T.-Y., Wang, Y.-L., Huang, L.-Y., Chen, C.-J., & Tseng, F.-L. (2013). The development of examination stress scale for junior high school students. Psychological Testing, 60(2), 291-318.】
- 香港考試及評核局（2011）。香港中學文憑考試－評級程序與水平參照成績匯報。取自http://www.hkeaa.edu.hk/DocLibrary/Media/Leaflets/HKDSE_SRR_A4_Booklet_Jun2011.pdf【Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority. (2011). Hong Kong diploma of secondary education Examination－Grading procedures and standards-referenced reporting booklet. Retrieved from http://www. hkeaa.edu.hk/DocLibrary/Media/Leaflets/HKDSE_SRR_A4_Booklet_Jun2011.pdf】
- 香港考試及評核局（2013）。香港中學文憑考試。取自http://www.hkeaa.edu.hk/DocLibrary/ Media/Leaflets/HKDSE_pamphlet_Chi_2013.pdf【Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority. (2013). Hong Kong diploma of secondary education (HKDSE) examination booklet. Retrieved from http://www.hkeaa.edu.hk/DocLibrary/Media/Leaflets/HKDSE_ pamphlet_Chi_2013.pdf】
- 國立臺灣師範大學心理與教育測驗研究發展中心（2013）。103年國中教育會考問與答手冊。取自http://cap.ntnu.edu.tw/documents/103capmanual.pdf【Research Center for Psychological and Education Testing, National Taiwan Normal University. (2013). The manual of the 2014 comprehensive assessment program for junior high school students. Retrieved from http://cap.ntnu.edu.tw/documents/103 capmanual.pdf】
- 張道行、陳清誥、徐慧萍、許福元（2007）。臺灣高中入學指標應用之比較與分析。載於國立臺灣師範大學心理與教育測驗研究發展中心舉辦之「2007入學考試與制度國際研討會」論文集（pp. 79-90），臺北市。【Chang, T.-H., Chen, C.-K., Hsu, H.-P., & Hsu, F.-Y. (2007). The development and analysis of senior high school admission criteria in Taiwan. In Research Center for Psychological and Education Testing, National Taiwan Normal University (Ed.), “2007 International Conference on Entrance Examination and Admission Policy” symposium (pp. 79-90), Taipei, Taiwan.】
- 教育部（2012）。國民小學及國民中學學生成績評量準則修正條文。取自http://host.lyjh.tyc.edu. tw/~reg/download/1010525.doc【Ministry of Education. (2012). Amendment of guidelines for the grading assessment of elementary and junior high school students. Retrieved from http://host.lyjh.tyc.edu.tw/~reg/download/1010525.doc】
- 教育部（2013a）。高中高職及五專免試入學實施方案。取自http://12basic.edu.tw/File/Levelimg_ 228/1-1.doc【Ministry of Education. (2013a). The vocational school, high school, and junior college entrance examination implementation program. Retrieved from http://12basic.edu.tw/File/Levelimg_228/1-1.doc】
- 教育部（2013b）。高中高職及五專特色招生實施方案。取自http://12basic.edu.tw/File/Levelimg_ 228/1-2.doc【Ministry of Education. (2013b). Vocational school, high school, and junior college academic ability test implementation program. Retrieved from http://12basic.edu.tw/File/Levelimg_228/1-2.doc】
- 詹紹威（2012）。美國共同核心州課程標準倡議之探討。教育研究與發展期刊，8（2），183-202。【Chan, S.-W. (2012). An analysis on common core state standards initiative of the United States of America. Journal of Educational Research and Development, 8(2), 183-202.】
- 譚光鼎、莊勝義、魯先華、康瀚文、陳怡璇（2007）。台灣高級中學多元入學政策之檢討。載於國立臺灣師範大學教育學系舉辦之「公義社會與教育行政革新國際學術研討會」論文集（pp. 27-64），臺北市。【Tan, K.-T., Chuang, S.-Y., Lu, H.-H., Kang, H.-W., & Chen, Y.-H. (2007). Reappraising the Policy of Multi- channel School Admission System for Taiwan Senior High Schools. In Department of Education, National Taiwan Normal University (Ed.), “Justice Society and Administrative Initiatives in Education International Conference” symposium (pp. 27-64), Taipei, Taiwan.】
- Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2013). 2013 NAPLAN national report. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu.au/results-and-reports/national-reports.html
- Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2011). Frequently asked questions. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/frequently-asked-questions
- Hambleton, R. K. (2001). Setting performance standards on educational assessments and criteria for evaluating the process. In G. J. Cizek (Ed.), Setting performance standards: Concepts, methods, and perspectives (pp. 89-116). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Illinois State Board of Education. (2010). Illinois Standards Achievement Test－2010 Technical Manual. Retrieved from http://www.isbe.net/assessment/pdfs/isat_tech_2010.pdf
- Linn, R. L., Baker, E. L., & Betebenner, D. W. (2002). Accountability systems: Implications of requirements of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Educational Researcher, 31(6), 3-16. doi:10.3102/0013189X031006003
- Linn, R. L., & Herman, J. L. (1997). A policymaker’s guide to standards-led assessment. Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.
- Llosa, L. (2007). Validating a standards-based classroom assessment of English proficiency: A multitrait-multimethod approach. Language Testing, 24(4), 489-515. doi:10.1177/0265532207 080770
- Llosa, L. (2008). Building and supporting a validity argument for a standards-based classroom assessment of English proficiency based on teacher judgments. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 27(3), 32-42. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2008.00126.x
- Llosa, L. (2011). Standards-based classroom assessments of English proficiency: A review of issues, current developments, and future directions for research. Language Testing, 28(3), 367-382. doi:10.1177/0265532211404188
- Lyon, E. (2011). Beliefs, practices, and reflection: Exploring a science teacher’s classroom assessment through the assessment triangle model. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(5), 417-435. doi:10.1007/s10972-011-9241-4
- Martone, A., & Sireci, S. G. (2009). Evaluating alignment between curriculum, assessment, and instruction. Review of Educational Research, 79(4), 1332-1361. doi:10.3102/00346543093413 75
- Reys, R., Reys, B., Lapan, R., Holliday, G., & Wasman, D. (2003). Assessing the impact of “standards”-based middle grades mathematics curriculum materials on student achievement. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(1), 74-95. doi:10.2307/30034700
- Sung, Y.-T., Chang, K.-E., Chiou, S.-K., & Hou, H.-T. (2005). The design and application of a Web-based self- and peer-assessment system. Computers and Education, 45(2), 187-202. doi:10. 1016/j.compedu.2004.07.002
- Sung, Y.-T., Tseng, F.-L., Kuo, N.-P., Chang, T.-Y., & Chiou, J.-M. (2014). Evaluating the effects of programs for reducing achievement gaps: A case study in Taiwan. Asia Pacific Education Review, 15(1), 99-113. doi:10.1007/s12564-013-9304-7
- Vermont Department of Education. (2012). Using standards in your classroom: A teacher resource guide. Retrieved from http://www.wssu.k12.vt.us/teachers/docs/UsingStandards.pdf
Journal directory listing - Volume 59 (2014) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【59(1)】March (Special Issue: 12-Year Basic Education)
(Special Issue) Standards-Based Assessments for 12-Year Basic Education in Taiwan
Author: Yao-Ting Sung(Research Center for Psychological and Educational Testing, National Taiwan Normal University), Yeh-Tai Chou(Research Center for Psychological and Educational Testing, National Taiwan Normal University), Feng-Lan Tseng(Research Center for Psychological and Educational Testing, National Taiwan Normal University)
Vol.&No.：Vol. 59, No. 1
Date：March 2014
Pages：1-32
DOI：10.6209/JORIES.2014.59(1).01
Abstract：
Taiwan officially implemented 12-Year Basic Education. Entrance examinations and classroom assessments are one of the keys to the success of this new program. Because thousands of Taiwanese children will be affected, how to help the program succeed deserves scrutiny. In recent years, many developed nations have used standards-based assessment to enhance their educational programs. Standards-based assessment, therefore, could potentially be advantageous for Taiwan as well. In this study, the implications of broadly applying standards-based assessment were investigated by exploring its effect on knowledge diversity, scholastic ability, and academic pressure among junior high school students.
Keywords：
12-Year Basic Education, classroom assessment, comprehensive assessment program for junior high school students, standards-based assessment of student achievement, standards-based assessment