期刊目錄列表 - 63卷(2018) - 【教育科學研究期刊】63(3)九月刊

教師工作價值觀量表之編製 作者:國立臺灣師範大學心理與教育測驗研究發展中心趙子揚、國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系宋曜廷、國立臺灣師範大學心理與教育測驗研究發展中心許明輝

卷期:63卷第3期
日期:2018年9月
頁碼:163-196
DOI:10.6209/JORIES.201809_63(3).0006

摘要:
本研究編製一份教師工作價值觀量表,期望未來幫助師資培育單位檢視師資生的教師工作價值觀,以提供學業成就之外的指標。研究一以30位資深教師,透過四場焦點團體之內容分析及文獻整理,初步整理出18個向度作為量表編製之依據;研究二分為預試階段及正式施測兩個階段。在預試階段方面,經由200位大學生之預試結果,最後保留76題,共10個向度之正式題本,其向度分別為「專業自我實現」、「專業自我成長」、「思考與挑戰性」、「引導陪伴學生」、「社會貢獻」、「公平正義」、「人際互動與管理」、「藝術體能活動」、「工作條件與福利」及「社會地位」。在正式施測方面,召募800位大學生作為參與者,進行信度及效度之檢驗。從折半信度及內部一致性之結果,顯示教師工作價值觀量表具有良好的信度。從驗證性因素分析之結果,本研究提供教師工作價值觀之構念效度證據,並針對教師工作價值觀編製之結果,提出未來實務應用上之建議。

關鍵詞:工作價值觀、師資生、教師工作價值觀、教師工作價值觀量表

《詳全文》 檔名

參考文獻:
  1. 宋曜廷、潘佩妤(2010)。混合研究在教育研究的應用。教育科學研究期刊,55(4),97-130。 【Sung, Y.-T., & Pan, P.-Y. (2010). Applications of mixed methods research in educational studies. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 55(4), 97-130. 】
  2. 吳鐵雄、李坤崇、劉佑星、歐慧敏(1995)。工作價值觀量表之編製初步報告。測驗年刊,42,227-243。 【Wu, T.-H., Lee, K.-C., Liu, Y.-H., & Ou, H.-M. (1995). A preliminary report on the construction of work value inventory. Psychological Testing, 42, 227-243.】
  3. 吳淑禎(2012)。師資生的工作價值觀與生涯定向研究。中等教育,63(1),61-80。 【Wu, S.-C. (2012). The study of work value and career decidedness of pre-service teacher. Secondary Education, 63(1), 61-80. 】
  4. 吳清基、黃嘉莉、張明文(2011)。我國師資培育政策回顧與展望。載於國家教育研究院(主編),我國百年教育回顧與展望(pp. 1-20)。新北市:編者。 【Wu, C.-J., Huang, J.-L., & Chang, M.-W. (2011). Retrospect and prospect of teacher education policy in Taiwan. In National Academy for Education Research (Ed.), Retrospect and prospect of education over the past one hundred years in Taiwan (pp. 1-20). New Taipei City, Taiwan: Editor.】
  5. 張瑞村(2008a)。中等學校教育實習輔導教師教學輔導方式、實習教師工作價值觀與實習教師教學效能關係之研究。朝陽人文社會學刊,6(1),59-121。 【Chang, R.-T. (2008a). A study of the relationships among mentors’ teaching mentoring styles, student-teachers’ work values, and student-teachers’ teaching effectiveness. Chaoyang Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(1), 59-121. 】
» 展開更多
中文APA引文格式趙子揚、宋曜廷、許明輝 (2018)。教師工作價值量表之編制。教育科學研究期刊,63(3),165-198。doi:10.6209/JORIES.201809_63(3).0006
APA FormatChao, T.- Y., Sung, Y.- T., Hsu, M.- H. (2018). Construction of the work values scale for teachers. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 63(3), 165-198. doi:10.6209/JORIES.201809_63(3).0006

Journal directory listing - Volume 63(2018) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【63(3)】september

Construction of the Work Values Scale for Teachers Author: Tzu-Yang Chao (Research Center for Psychological and Educational Testing, National Taiwan Normal University), Yao-Ting Sung (Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling, National Taiwan Normal University), Ming-Hui Hsu (Research Center for Psychological and Educational Testing, National Taiwan Normal University)

Vol.&No.:Vol. 63, No.3
Date:September 2018
Pages:163-196
DOI:10.6209/JORIES.201809_63(3).0006

Abstract:
This study developed a work values scale for teachers (WVST) to enable teacher education institutions to inspect the work values of student teachers. In Study 1, we employed focus groups and examined the literature. Through conducting a content analysis of four focus groups comprising 30 experienced teachers and comparing the analysis results with the literature, we assembled 18 dimensions to form the basis of the WVST. In Study 2, we conducted scale evaluation, which was divided into a pilot-test stage and a formal-test stage. In the pilot-test stage, we recruited 200 university students as participants. After conducting an item analysis and an exploratory factor analysis, we retained 76 items and ten dimensions, namely professional self-realization, professional self-growth, reflection and challenges, guiding students, social contribution, equality and justice, interpersonal interaction and management, artistic and physical activities, working conditions and benefits, and social status. In the formal-test stage, we recruited 800 university students to complete the WVST in order to determine scale reliability and validity. The results for split-half reliability and internal consistency reliability revealed that the WVST achieved favorable reliability. The results from confirmatory factor analysis also indicated the construct validity of the WVST. On the basis of these results, we provided suggestions for future practical applications of the WVST in measuring the work values of teachers.

Keywords:student teachers, teachers’ work values, work values, work values scale for teachers