Search by article title, author,
keywords, and DOI

[Call for Papers] Special Issue: “New Southbound Education: Cross-National Dialogue on Educational Research and Practice between Taiwan and Vietnam” (From now until September 30, 2026)      Call for papers for the special issue “Prevention and Treatment of Addictive Behaviors on Campus” (Final submission deadline: 2021/8/31)      The Journal of Research in Education Sciences will no longer provide printed copies     

Journal directory listing - Volume 70 (2025) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【70(4)】December (Special Issue: Older Adult Education)
Back

(Special Issue) Limited Resources, Unlimited Energy: The Structure and Implementation of Resource Networks for Senior Citizen Learning Centers
Author:
Chun-Ting Yeh (Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling, National Pingtung University)

Vol.&No.：Vol. 70, No. 4
Date：December 2025
Pages：57-89
DOI：https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202512_70(4).0003

Abstract：

Research Motivation and Purpose
　　Resource integration and utilization have consistently been central to both international and Taiwan’s older adult education policies, yet this issue remains unresolved. In practice, addressing it requires communication and consultation among various government departments, making a quick resolution unlikely. Consequently, this study does not aim to investigate resource integration at the policy level; rather, it focuses on the connection and application of resources from the perspective of Senior Citizen Learning Centers (SCLCs). The purpose of this study is to understand the challenges posed by limited resources in SCLCs, as well as the resource networks they have established and how these networks are utilized.
Literature Review
　　This study employed the connotation of program planning and resource utilization as its core conceptual framework. This approach clarified the various types of resources within the program planning and resource network ecology of SCLCs, as well as their connections and significance to the planning of older adult learning programs. The Social Ecological Model served as a tool for a comprehensive analysis of the dynamic development processes of SCLCs across different administrative, community, and organizational levels. Furthermore, it elucidated how various organizational relationships form a mutual aid network of community resources, facilitated cross-domain and cross-unit cooperation, and ultimately demonstrated the operational outcomes of older adult learning initiatives.
Research Methods
　　Through qualitative research, this study clarified the complex context of the resource network of SCLCs, highlighting the challenges they faced due to limited resources, as well as the strategies, experiences, outcomes, and significance they had adopted in addressing these challenges. Ultimately, a comprehensive understanding of SCLCs’ resource network can be established. This study involved interviews with 15 directors of SCLCs, comprising 4 males and 11 females. The participants’ ages ranged from 46 to 75 years, with an average age of 55. The courses offered by the interviewed SCLCs are diverse, indicating their utilization of various resources to provide a range of specialized courses. These courses include natural ecology, humanities and arts, leisure activities, sports, life applications, and spiritual growth, among others. The interview data were analyzed using the constant comparative method.
Research Results
　　(1) The resource constraints faced by SCLCs must be addressed by the government, local authorities, and the organizations themselves. Limited resources not only directly impacted organizational development and curriculum promotion but may also fostered a sense of relative deprivation in resource allocation, leading to psychological effects on willingness and enthusiasm for investment. Organizers of varying sizes and SCLCs located in urban or rural areas may experience different impacts and adopted diverse strategies to address varying levels of resource challenges. For instance, larger organizations typically possessed more adequate internal manpower, professional equipment, and spaced to implement cross-regional operational services. Educational institutions often had access to better-qualified teachers, while smaller community units focus on empowering their members and trained them as instructors. Rural communities and educational organizers actively sought to leverage local cultural and natural resources. Therefore, when evaluating and formulating resource-related plans, it was essential to consider the type, scale, and regional characteristics of the local SCLCs’ organizers.
　　(2) Recognizing the intrinsic value of an organization allowed SCLCs to leverage and enhanced their internal resources while appreciating the significance of older adult learning. Large-scale organizational units typically benefited from superior resources, teaching staff, and facilities. Regardless of their size or geographic location, these units prioritized the strengthening of human resources and expertise. In contrast, smaller units situated in remote areas focus on enhancing the capabilities of their existing personnel to compensate for the challenges of attracting external lecturers. Moreover, the concept of friendly spaces carried both internal and community implications. In larger units, friendliness was often reflected in the equitable distribution of equipment usage rights and the mutual support systems established among departments. At the community level, friendly spaces emphasized interaction and integration between SCLCs and their surrounding communities. Most importantly, it was essential to recognize the significance of older adult learning, which enabled organizations and communities to identify challenges, fostered growth through practical engagement, and showcased the intrinsic value of the organization. Improved clarity, vocabulary, and technical accuracy while maintaining the original meaning.
　　(3) To build a broader resource network, the strategic direction of the SCLCs were to integrate professional and interdisciplinary resources with local and innovative elements. Regardless of the size of the SCLC, it was essential to establish a two-way cooperation mechanism with local organizations to enhance the curriculum and teaching content. Additionally, it was important to apply for plans and funding from various government departments and to established cross-departmental resource connections. By combining resources obtained from diverse channels with the organization’s foundational assets, the SCLCs integrated local natural ecology and cultural traditions. Given the constraints of limited resources, the SCLCs organized the ecological model of resources and develops solutions tailored to local characteristics, thereby creating limitless possibilities.
Discussion and Recommendations
　　This study found that large SCLC organizers possess adequate internal manpower, professional equipment, and space to implement cross-regional action services. School hosts had a stronger internal teaching staff, while smaller community hosts concentrated on empowering their internal members and training them as lecturers. Rural communities and school organizers actively explored local cultural and natural resources.
　　Based on the research findings, the following recommendations for policies and practices are proposed: identify trends in policy development to secure financial subsidies, effectively utilize local natural, ecological, and socio-cultural resources, establish mutually beneficial relationships with local organizations, and enhance the empowerment of the management team to strengthen the foundation of internal resources. By integrating these strategies, a comprehensive resource network can be developed.
　　In the future, research can be conducted on the negotiation issues related to the planning of special programs for SCLCs. Additionally, the operational outcomes of the SCLCs itself are crucial for attracting other organizations to collaborate. This, in turn, can lead to further research on marketing strategies and the experiences associated with older adult learning programs.

Keywords：program planning, social ecological model, resource network, senior citizen learning

《Full Text》 檔名

References：
岑淑筱、李頎泓、陳川正（2015）。非營利組織轉型社會企業其組織關鍵作為－以弘道老人基金會為例。輔仁管理評論，22（1），21-52。
【Tsen, S.-H., Lee, C.-H., & Chen, C.-C. (2015). A possible transformation from nonprofit organization to social enterprise-case study of filming “go grand riders” of Hondao Senior Citizen’s Welfare Foundation. Fu Jen Management Review, 22(1), 21-52.】
林麗惠、張智翔（2023）。當高齡教育專業走入C級巷弄長照站－談高齡健康促進的推動與可能。長期照護雜誌，26（1），27-36。https://doi.org/10.6317/LTC.202306_26(1).0003
【Lin, L.-H., & Chang, Z.-X. (2023). The collaboration between elder education and the C-level alley long-term care service station: Discussion on the promotion and possibility of senior health promotion. The Journal of Long-Term Care, 26(1), 27-36. https://doi.org/10.6317/LTC.202306_26(1).0003】
胡夢鯨（2023）。翻轉成人教學：理論、方法與應用。師大書苑。
【Hu, M.-G. (2023). Flipped adult teaching: Theory, methods and applications. Lucky Bookstore.】
張玉龍（2020）。非營利老人福利機構的組織績效與困境：社會影響力觀點的分析。社會政策與社會工作學刊，24（2），95-141。https://doi.org/10.6785/SPSW.202012_24(2).0003
【Chang, Y.-L. (2020). Performance contents and predicaments of nonprofit long-term care institutions for the elderly: Perspective of social impacts. Social Policy & Social Work, 24(2), 95-141. https://doi.org/10.6785/　SPSW.202012_24(2).0003】
張菀珍（2023）。大學生參與社區失智高齡者服務學習成效及轉化學習研究。教育科學研究期刊，68（2），235-267。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202306_68(2).0008
【Chang, W.-J. (2023). Service-learning effectiveness and transformative learning among college students engaging in community services involving older adults with dementia. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 68(2), 235-267. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202306_68(2).0008】
» More
APA Format
Yeh, C.-T. (2025). Limited Resources, Unlimited Energy: The Structure and Implementation of Resource Networks for Senior Citizen Learning Centers. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 70(4), 57-89. 
https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202512_70(4).0003