(Special Issue) Empirical Study on Developing Digital Literacy Among Middle-aged and Older Adults: Perspectives From the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology and Learning Beliefs
Author: Yi-Hui Liu (Department of Senior Service Management, National Taichung University of Science and Technology)
Vol.&No.：Vol. 70, No. 4
Date：December 2025
Pages：157-190
DOI：https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202512_70(4).0006
Abstract：
Research Motivation and Purpose
With the rapid advancement of digital devices and online infrastructure, this study focuses on older adults to understand their experiences with technology use and to provide proactive measures to narrow the digital gap. Through supportive education and training, positive perceptions of technology use among middle-aged and older adults can be reinforced, thus reducing the multiple disadvantages of the so-called gray digital divide and enhancing their confidence and motivation to use digital devices. Accordingly, this study aims to examine the digital divide in lifelong learning, a disparity that has been highlighted in the post-pandemic era. By examining digital literacy in adult education, this study investigates the digital divide in lifelong learning in Taiwan. Drawing on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT), adult learning beliefs, and digital literacy perspectives, it explores the introduction of digital literacy courses and proposes recommendations for mitigating the digital divide among middle-aged and older adults.
Literature Review
From an international perspective, this study intends to reflect on the post-pandemic needs and insights for adult education in Taiwan. Compared to compulsory and higher education during the past few years of the pandemic, adult education has faced significant challenges in delivering well-prepared and refined digital or online courses. Moreover, in today’s information society, without digital literacy, it is difficult to safeguard basic human rights such as access to information, education, and social participation. Consequently, this literature review examines the phenomenon of the gray digital divide, the theoretical underpinnings of the UTAUT, learning beliefs, and digital literacy course design. These discussions serve as a basis for decisions on how to enhance digital literacy among middle-aged and older adults.
Research Method
This study focuses on learners aged 55 and above, seeking to determine whether learning beliefs and the UTAUT are shaped by digital literacy and to explore how the introduction of “digital literacy courses” impacts learning beliefs and the UTAUT among middle-aged and older learners. Previous studies indicate that “digital literacy” is a crucial factor influencing whether older adults choose to engage in digital learning. Additionally, differences in “UTAUT” factors and “digital literacy” among learners exert varying effects on “learning beliefs.”
In this research design, participants were divided into two groups: one that did not participate in digital literacy courses and another that did, followed by questionnaire administration. In the non-participating group, 382 questionnaires were collected, of which 28 invalid responses were removed due to incomplete or uniform answers. In the group that participated in digital literacy courses, 120 questionnaires were collected, with four invalid responses removed. After excluding a total of 32 invalid questionnaires, 470 valid samples remained, yielding a 93.6% usability rate. Once the questionnaire was drafted, three experts reviewed the wording and content, making revisions to ensure appropriateness for middle-aged and older respondents. IBM SPSS Statistics 26.0 was then used to perform quantitative statistical analysis of the data.
Research Results
This study focuses on enhancing digital literacy among middle-aged and older learners in the post-pandemic era, incorporating both the UTAUT and learning beliefs. It confirms the applicability of the UTAUT, particularly in significantly influencing learning beliefs among middle-aged and older learners. According to the findings, the introduction of digital literacy courses helps narrow the gray digital divide in this population and has a pronounced effect on strengthening their confidence in digital learning and enhancing their learning beliefs. The results indicate that incorporating digital literacy courses can significantly increase the positive influence of the UTAUT on learning beliefs, with digital literacy exhibiting a partial mediating effect between the two. This finding highlights the vital bridging role of digital literacy in the process through which middle-aged and older learners adopt emerging technologies and form learning beliefs.
Furthermore, middle-aged and older learners continue to face certain challenges regarding digital literacy. The findings of this study reveal a significant positive relationship between the UTAUT and digital literacy, with digital literacy serving as an essential mediation factor in elevating learning beliefs. These outcomes suggest that middle-aged and older learners indeed have room for growth in developing and applying digital literacy, aligning with the literature that indicates potential disadvantages for older adults in a digital society.
Discussion and Recommendations
(1) Providing Learners With Diverse Digital Literacy Course Designs
In accordance with the digital needs and cognitive characteristics of middle-aged and older learners, course design should be tiered and the long-term benefits after course implementation should be tracked, including learners’ continued application of digital skills and cross-context adaptability. In addition, a blended learning model that combines online and face-to-face formats and is tailored to middle-aged and older adults may enhance learning flexibility and effectiveness while improving the experiences and learning outcomes of learners.
(2) Developing Support Systems through Intergenerational or Community-based Learning
Family and social support systems may be integrated to create intergenerational co-learning models. By embracing cross-generational co-learning, family participation and intergenerational interactive motivation can be infused, coupled with resource provisions and course incentives, to attract greater participation from middle-aged and older learners. Such efforts put social inclusion into practice, providing middle-aged and older learners with sufficient skills and confidence to engage wholeheartedly in digital technology-related courses.
(3) Continuing to Deepen Research on Digital Literacy among Middle-aged and Older Adults
Future research could employ more refined sample classifications and incorporate background variables such as participants’ health status, retirement situation, and caregiving responsibilities to explore their impact on digital learning behaviors and outcomes. This approach would enrich the research model and potentially uncover deeper influences on learning behavior. Additionally, long-term research designs combined with practical implementations, such as randomized controlled trials, would help foster trust, recognition, and cooperation from both participants and institutions regarding random assignment, thereby further enhancing the randomness and inferential validity of the research design.
Keywords：middle-aged and older learners, gray digital divide, digital literacy, Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT)
《Full Text》
References：吳明烈、李藹慈、賴弘基（2010）。我國終身學習的發展困境與因應策略。台灣教育，666，13-25。https://doi.org/10.6395/TER.201012.0013
【Wu, M.-L., Lee, A.-T., & Lai, H.-C. (2010). Exploration on the problems and solutions of lifelong learning development in Taiwan. Taiwan Education Review, 666, 13-25. https://doi.org/10.6395/TER.201012.0013】
田惠珠（2021）。家長讀書會成員的學習信念與親子互動之關聯性研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立中山大學。
【Tien, H.-C. (2021). Exploring the relationship between the learning beliefs of parents’ book club members and parent-child interaction [Unpublished master’s thesis]. National Sun Yat-sen University.】
李怡道（2021）。蘇格蘭經驗：被疫情逼出水面的數位落差。臺灣教育評論月刊，10（6），74-78。
【Lee, Y.-D. (2021). The Scottish experience: How the pandemic exposed the digital divide. Taiwan Educational Review Monthly, 10(6), 74-78.】
林季緯、何青蓉、黃如薏、王維典（2016）。健康識能的概念發展與實務應用。台灣家庭醫學雜誌，26（2），65-76。https://doi.org/10.3966/168232812016062602001
【Lin, C.-W., Ho, C.-J., Huang, R.-Y., & Wang, W.-D. (2016). Health literacy: Conceptual development and practical application. Taiwan Journal of Family Medicine, 26(2), 65-76. https://doi.org/10.3966/16823281201606 2602001】
林明煌（2019）。應用日語系學生學習動機、信念和日語能力之相關研究。人文社會學報，19，125-158。
【Lin, M.-H. (2019). Exploring the links between motivation, beliefs, and Japanese language proficiency among applied Japanese majors. Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 19, 125-158.】
» More
一、中文文獻
吳明烈、李藹慈、賴弘基（2010）。我國終身學習的發展困境與因應策略。台灣教育，666，13-25。https://doi.org/10.6395/TER.201012.0013
【Wu, M.-L., Lee, A.-T., & Lai, H.-C. (2010). Exploration on the problems and solutions of lifelong learning development in Taiwan. Taiwan Education Review, 666, 13-25. https://doi.org/10.6395/TER.201012.0013】
田惠珠（2021）。家長讀書會成員的學習信念與親子互動之關聯性研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立中山大學。
【Tien, H.-C. (2021). Exploring the relationship between the learning beliefs of parents’ book club members and parent-child interaction [Unpublished master’s thesis]. National Sun Yat-sen University.】
李怡道（2021）。蘇格蘭經驗：被疫情逼出水面的數位落差。臺灣教育評論月刊，10（6），74-78。
【Lee, Y.-D. (2021). The Scottish experience: How the pandemic exposed the digital divide. Taiwan Educational Review Monthly, 10(6), 74-78.】
林季緯、何青蓉、黃如薏、王維典（2016）。健康識能的概念發展與實務應用。台灣家庭醫學雜誌，26（2），65-76。https://doi.org/10.3966/168232812016062602001
【Lin, C.-W., Ho, C.-J., Huang, R.-Y., & Wang, W.-D. (2016). Health literacy: Conceptual development and practical application. Taiwan Journal of Family Medicine, 26(2), 65-76. https://doi.org/10.3966/16823281201606 2602001】
林明煌（2019）。應用日語系學生學習動機、信念和日語能力之相關研究。人文社會學報，19，125-158。
【Lin, M.-H. (2019). Exploring the links between motivation, beliefs, and Japanese language proficiency among applied Japanese majors. Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 19, 125-158.】
翁晨語、黃惠萍（2017）。以延伸整合型科技接受模式和數位生活型態探討LINE TV的使用行為。資訊社會研究，33，17-63。https://doi.org/10.29843/JCCIS.201707_(33).0002
【Weng, C.-Y., & Huang, H.-P. (2017). A study on the use behavior of LINE TV based on the UTAUT2 and digital lifestyle scale. Journal of Cyber Culture and Information Society, 33, 17-63. https://doi.org/10.29843/ JCCIS.201707_(33).0002】
國家發展委員會（2018）。107年持有手機民眾數位機會調查報告。https://www.ndc.gov.tw/ cp.aspx?n=55C8164714DFD9E9
【National Development Council. (2018). 2018 digital opportunity survey for mobile phone users. https://www.ndc. gov.tw/cp.aspx?n=55C8164714DFD9E9】
張芳全、林盈均（2017）。家長教育程度、文化資本、教育期望與學生學習信念對國語成就影響之研究。臺北市立大學學報‧教育類，49（1），1-26。https://doi.org/10.6336/ JUTEE.201806_49(1).0001
【Chang, F.-C., & Lin, Y.-C. (2018). The impact of parents’ education level, cultural capital, parents’ education expectations, and students’ learning beliefs on Chinese language achievement. Journal of University of Taipei‧ Education, 49(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.6336/JUTEE.201806_49(1).0001】
張淑卿、陳捷宇（2021）。獨立倡導保障臺灣老人權益之實踐現況。社區發展季刊，176，128-139。
【Chang, S.-C., & Chen, C.-Y. (2021). The current reality of independent advocacy for safeguarding the rights of elderly persons in Taiwan. Community Development Journal, 176, 128-139.】
陳明涓（2014）。非日語主修學習者的日語學習信念調查－以大同大學為例。大同大學通識教育年報，10，1-17。https://doi.org/10.6514/TJGE.201407_(10).0009
【Chen, M.-C. (2014). A research on learning belief of non-major Japanese learners in Taiwan: An example of Tatung University Tatung University Journal of General Education, 10, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.6514/ TJGE.201407_(10).0009】
曾詩婷、王仁俊（2022）。國小高年級資訊教育與數位素養教育之現況研究－以高雄市為例。工業科技教育學刊，15，170-187。https://doi.org/10.6306/JITE.202211_(15).0010
【Tseng, S.-T., & Wang, J.-C. (2022). A study of information technology education and digital literacy in elementary school in Kaosiung. Journal of Industrial Technology Education, 15, 170-187. https://doi.org/10.6306/ JITE.202211_(15).0010】
黃妍甄（2021）。從數位機會指標分析臺灣數位發展變遷。中國地方自治，74（5），4-27。https://doi.org/10.6581/lsgc.202105_74(5).0002
【Huang, Y.-C. (2021). Analyzing the changes in Taiwan’s digital development from digital opportunity indicators (2002-2019). Chinese Journal of Local Self-Governance, 74(5), 4-27. https://doi.org/10.6581/lsgc. 202105_74(5).0002】
黃生源（2012）。國小四年級學生數學學習動機、態度與成就之研究—以台南市濱海地區為例(未出版碩士論文)。國立臺東大學。
【Huang, S.-Y. (2012). A study of the fourth grade student on learning motivation, attitude and achievement in math [Unpublished master’s thesis]. National Taichung University of Education.】
楊超仁（2017）。新竹縣國小教師數位素養對增進專業能力之研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立臺中教育大學。
【Yang, C.-R. (2017). The study on digital literacy to enhancep professional ability of elementary school teachers in Hsinchu County [Unpublished master’s thesis]. National Taichung University of Education.】
二、外文文獻
Allatt, G., & Tett, L. (2019) Adult literacy practitioners and employability skills: Resisting neo-liber alism? Journal of Education Policy, 34(4), 577-594.
Alston, P. (2015). Report of the special rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights. https:// digitallibrary.un.org/record/798707?v=pdf
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
Bhattacharjee, P., Baker, S., & Waycott, J. (2021, February 15). Older adults and their acquisition of digital skills: A review of current research evidence. In N. Ahmadpour, T. Leong, B. Ploderer, C. Parker, S. Webber, D. Munoz, L. Loko, & M. Tomitsch (Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd conference on human-computer interaction (99. 437-443). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3441000. 3441053
Buehl, M. M., & Beck, J. S. (2015). The relationship between teachers’ beliefs and teachers’ practices. In H. Fives & M. Gregoire Gill (Eds.), International handbook of research on teachers’ beliefs (pp. 66-84). Routledge.
Chen, K., & Chan, A. H. S. (2014). Gerontechnology acceptance by elderly Hong Kong Chinese: A senior technology acceptance model (STAM). Ergonomics, 57(5), 635-652. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00140139.2014.895855
Chiu, C. J., Tasi, W. C., Yang, W. L., & Guo, J. L. (2019). How to help older adults learn new technology? Results from a multiple case research interviewing the internet technology instructors at the senior learning center. Computers & Education, 129, 61-70. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.020
DeVellis. R. F. (1991). Scale development. Sage.
Eynon, R. (2021). Becoming digitally literate: Reinstating an educational lens to digital skills policies for adults. British Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 146-162. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/berj.3686
Farue E., Herrera, F., Kaddoura, A. R., Lopes, H., Petrovski, A. V., Rahnema, M., & Ward, F. C. (1997). Learning to be: The world of education today and tomorrow. https://unesdoc. unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000001801
Ferreira, S. M., Sayago, S., & Blat, J. (2016). Going beyond tele centers to foster the digital inclusion of older people in Brazil: Lessons learned from a rapid ethnographical study. Information Technology for Development, 22(1), 26-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102. 2015.1091974
Flauzino, K. D. L., Pimentel, M., Batistoni, S., Zaine, I., Vieira, L., Rodrigues, K., & Cachioni, M. (2020). Digital literacy for older adults: Perceptions about teaching-learning. Educação & Realidade, 45(4), e104913. https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-6236104913
Fredriksen, B. (2017). Creating productive jobs for Africa’s youth: A huge challenge with global implications. NORRAG NewsBite [blogpost, 8 June 2017]. https://www.norrag.org/creating- productive-jobs-africas-youth-huge-challenge-global-implications/
Gallistl, V., Rohner, R., Hengl, L., & Kolland, F. (2021). Doing digital exclusion-technology practices of older internet non-users. Journal of Aging Studies, 59, Article 100973. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2021.100973
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson.
Hall, A., Bernhardt, J., Dodd, V., & Vollrath, M. (2015). The digital health divide: Evaluating online health information access and use among older adults. Health Education & Behavior, 42(2), 202-209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198114547815
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression based approach. Guilford Press.
Hargittai, E., & Dobransky, K. (2017). Old dogs, new clicks: Digital inequality in skills and uses among older adults. Canadian Journal of Communication, 42(2), 195-212. https://doi.org/ 10.22230/cjc.2017v42n2a3176
Hennington, A. H., & Janz, B. D. (2007). Information systems and healthcare XVI: Physician adoption of electronic medical records: Applying the UTAUT model in a healthcare context. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 19(5), 60-80.
Kalaja, P., & Barcelos, A. M. F. (Eds.). (2003). Beliefs about SLA: New research approaches. Kluwer Academic Press.
Kalaja, P., Barcelos, A. M. F., Aro, M., Ruohotie-Lyhty, M., & Macmillan, P. (2015). Beliefs, agency and identity in foreign language learning and teaching. Palgrave Macmillan.
Khan, A., & Woosley, J. M. (2011). Comparison of contemporary technology acceptance models and evaluation of the best fit for health industry organizations. International Journal of Computer Science Engineering & Technology, 1(11), 709-717.
Käpplinger, B., & Lichte, N. (2020). “The lockdown of physical co-operation touches the heart of adult education”: A Delphi study on immediate and expected effects of COVID-19. International Review of Education, 66(5-6), 777-795. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159- 020-09871-w
Lai, C. (2019). Learning beliefs and autonomous language learning with technology beyond the classroom. Language Awareness, 28(4), 291-309. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2019. 1675679
Lin, Y. Y. (2011). Older adults’ motivation to learn in higher education [Paper presentation]. Adult Education Research Conference (AERC), Toronto, Canada.
Lordache, C., Mariën, I., & Baelden, D. (2017). Developing digital skills and competences: A quick-scan analysis of 13 digital literacy models. Italian Journal of Sociology of Education, 9(1), 6-30.
Mahler, C. (2021). Report of the independent expert on the enjoyment of all human rights by older persons. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3938306?v=pdf
Martínez-Alcalá, C. I., Rosales-Lagarde, A., Pérez-Pérez, Y. M., Lopez-Noguerola, J. S., Bautista-Díaz, M. L., & Agis-Juarez, R. A. (2021). The effects of Covid-19 on the digital literacy of the elderly: Norms for digital inclusion. Frontiers in Education, 6, 716025. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.716025
McDonough, C. (2016). The effect of ageism on the digital divide among older adults. Journal of Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, 2(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.24966/GGM-8662/100008
McDonough, C. C. (2016). The effect of ageism on the digital divide among older adults. Journal of Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, 2. https://doi.org/10.24966/GGM-8662/100008
Mikołajczyk, B. (2022). Universal human rights instruments and digital literacy of older persons. The International Journal of Human Rights, 27(3), 403-424. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987. 2022.2131772
Mi11kołajczyk, B. (2022). Universal human rights instruments and digital literacy of older persons. The International Journal of Human Rights, 27(3), 403-424. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987. 2022.2131772
Momani, A. M. (2020). The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: A new approach in technology acceptance. International Journal of Sociotechnology and Knowledge Development, 12(3), 79-98. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJSKD.2020070105
Momani, A. M., & Jamous, M. M. (2017). The evolution of technology acceptance theories. International Journal of Contemporary Computer Research, 1(1), 51-58.
Moore, R. C., & Hancock, J. T. (2020). Older adults, social technologies, and the coronavirus pandemic: Challenges, strengths, and strategies for support. Social Media + Society, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120948162
Nguyen, Q. D., Fernandez, N., Karsenti, T., & Charlin, B. (2014). What is reflection? A conceptual analysis of major definitions and a proposal of a five‐component model. Medical Education, 48(12), 1176-1189. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12583
Olphert, C. W., Damodaran, L., & May, A. J. (2005, August 23-25). Towards digital inclusion– Engaging older people in the digital world [Paper presentation]. Accessible Design in the Digital World Conference, Dundee, Scotland. http://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/ AD2005.17
Parks, R., Evans, B., & Getch, Y. (2013). Motivations and enculturation of older students returning to a traditional university. New Horizons in Adult Education & Human Resource Development, 25(3), 62-75.
Ragnedda, M., & Mutsvairo, B. (Eds.). (2018). Digital inclusion: Empowering people through information and communication technologies. Lexington Books. http://doi.org/10.5771/ 9781498562133
Schirmer, W., Geerts, N., Vercruyssen, A., Glorieux, I., & Digital Ageing Consortium. (2022). Digital skills training for older people: The importance of the “lifeworld”. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 101, 104695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2022.104695
Schroeder, R. (2018). Social theory after the internet: Media, technology and globalization. UCL Press.
Seifert, A., Cotten, S. R., & Xie, B. (2021). A double burden of exclusion? Digital and social exclusion of older adults in times of COVID-19. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 76(3), e99-e103. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaa098
Smythe, S. (2015) Ten years of adult literacy policy and practice in Canada: Literacy policy ten sions and workarounds. Language and Literacy, 17(2), 4-21.
UNESCO Institute for Lifelong. (2017). The status of adult learning and education in sub-Saharan Africa (CONFINTEA VI mid-term review 2017. Regional report). https://icae.global/en/ wp-content/uploads/2017/11/ALE-in-Sub-Saharan-Africa.pdf
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2016). Education for people and planet: Creating sustainable futures for all, Global education monitoring report, 2016. https:// doi.org/10.54676/AXEQ8566
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2017). Aid to education falls for the sixth consecutive year. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/aid-education-falls-sixth- consecutive-year
van Deursen, A. J., & van Dijk, J. A. (2011). Internet skills and the digital divide. New Media & Society, 13(6), 893-911. https://doi.org/0.1177/1461444810386774
van Deursen, A. J., & van Dijk, J. A. (2019). The first-level digital divide shifts from inequalities in physical access to inequalities in material access. New Media & Society, 21(2), 354-375. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818797082
van Dijk, J. A. (2017). Afterword: The state of digital divide theory. In M. Ragnedda & G. Muscher (Eds.), Theorizing digital divides (pp. 199-206). Routledge.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/ 30036540
Wu, Y. H., Damnée, S., Kerhervé, H., Ware, C., & Rigaud, A. S. (2015). Bridging the digital divide in older adults: A study from an initiative to inform older adults about new technologies. Clinical Interventions in Aging, 10, 193-201. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S72399