A Multilevel Moderation Analysis of the Relationship Among Teachers’ Perceptions of the Principal’s Leadership Occupational Competency and the School’s Organizational Culture on the School’s Effectiveness in State-run Experimental Elementary Schools
Author: Chien-Chih Chen (Department of Educational Management, National Taipei University of Education), Chung-Yi Li (Yunlin County Government), Joseph Meng-Chun Chin (Yunlin County Government)
Vol.&No.:Vol. 70, No. 4
Date:December 2025
Pages:225-257
DOI:https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202512_70(4).0008
Abstract:
Research Motivation and Purpose
The rise of experimental education in Taiwan reflects a broader global trend emphasizing diverse and inclusive educational reforms. These reforms aim to meet the growing demand for personalized learning paths that cater to students’ varied needs and parental expectations. In 2014, Taiwan took a significant step forward by enacting the “Three Acts of Experimental Education,” which aimed to institutionalize innovation and diversity within its educational framework. This progressive legislation has encouraged the proliferation of experimental schools, fostering educational creativity and flexibility. However, the rapid expansion of experimental education schools has also brought significant challenges, especially in achieving effective school performance within these unique and less traditional frameworks. One critical factor in addressing these challenges is the principal’s occupational competency (OC) in leadership. Effective leadership directly impacts school effectiveness (SE) and interacts with the school’s organizational culture to either amplify or mitigate this impact. In the distinctive environment of experimental schools, where organizational culture varies widely– ranging from highly innovative practices to consensus-driven approaches– these cultural differences may significantly influence the relationship between leadership occupational competency (LOC) and school outcomes. This study investigates these complex relationships, providing a deeper understanding of how principals’ leadership skills and cultural factors shape SE in experimental education.
Literature Review
OC is a comprehensive concept that integrates knowledge, skills, values, and attitudes, serving as a crucial predictor of job performance. Within the educational context, transformational, transactional, distributed, and positive leadership styles– have consistently positively affected school outcomes. For instance, transformational leadership inspires teachers and students, transactional leadership ensures goal attainment, and distributed leadership promotes stakeholder collaboration. Despite the extensive research on these leadership styles, the specific examination of principals’ LOC in experimental education settings remains limited. Simultaneously, school organizational culture (SOC) is pivotal in shaping leadership effectiveness. Innovative learning within an organizational culture encourages creative teaching practices and collaborative problem-solving, while organizational consensus fosters unity and effective communication among stakeholders. By hypothesizing that these cultural dimensions moderate the relationship between LOC and SE, this study provides a more nuanced understanding of how these factors interact and influence each other.
Research Methodology
This study employed a quantitative survey methodology to explore the relationships among principals’ LOC, SOC, and SE in state-run experimental elementary schools in Taiwan. During the 2022 academic year, the study began with a pilot phase in which 160 questionnaires were distributed, yielding 158 valid responses. These data were analyzed using SmartPLS4 to validate the research instruments. The main survey phase expanded to 30 schools, collecting 6-12 valid responses per school, ensuring a robust multilevel dataset for analysis. The data were subsequently analyzed using SPSS for descriptive statistics and hierarchical linear modeling (HLM), allowing for the exploration of direct effects and multilevel interactions among variables. This comprehensive approach enabled the study to test its hypotheses and gain in-depth insights into the factors influencing SE.
Research Findings
1. Direct Impact of Teachers’ Perceptions of the Principal’s LOC on Aspects of SE
The study demonstrated that principals’ LOC significantly influences multiple dimensions of SE. Specifically, innovation, integration, and marketing competency positively affected administrative leadership, teacher performance, student learning, community recognition, and environmental infrastructure. These results highlight the importance of principals’ ability to integrate resources and implement strategic initiatives. Conversely, planning and execution competency, while beneficial for teacher performance, negatively impacted student learning, likely due to a misalignment between strategic priorities and student needs. Communication competency stood out for its role in enhancing community engagement and recognition, while global awareness competency introduced valuable international perspectives and resources, contributing to improved facilities and broader recognition. Self-management competency was particularly impactful for administrative leadership and student learning, underscoring the importance of principals’ professional growth and self-regulation. However, the effects of strategic operational and teamwork competency was less pronounced, indicating the need for a balanced leadership approach.
2. Direct Impact of Innovative Learning in SOC on SE
Innovative learning emerged as a critical cultural dimension, significantly enhancing administrative leadership, teacher teaching, student learning, and community recognition. However, it did not significantly affect environmental infrastructure, suggesting that its benefits are more pronounced in human-centered aspects of SE. While theoretically significant, organizational consensus did not directly influence SE in the sampled schools.
3. Moderating Effects of SOC
(1) Innovative learning positively moderated the relationship between innovation, integration, marketing competency, and administrative leadership, indicating that schools with an innovative culture directly enhance SE and amplify the impact of the principal’s LOC on SE.
(2) Innovative learning negatively moderates the relationship between global awareness competency and environmental infrastructure, suggesting that when school culture strongly emphasizes innovation, an excessive focus on global perspectives may detract from resource allocation toward ecological facilities.
(3) Organizational consensus positively moderated the relationships between strategic operational competency and administrative leadership, as well as teamwork competency and community recognition, demonstrating that a consensus-driven culture facilitates collaboration among school members and promotes school development.
Discussion and Recommendations
The findings underscore the pivotal role of a principal’s LOC in driving SE within state-run experimental elementary schools. Additionally, the innovative and consensus-driven aspects of SOC are critical factors that directly enhance SE and strengthen the impact of LOC. Based on these findings, the following recommendations are proposed:
1. Developing Leadership Competencies
Educational administrators should prioritize cultivating and developing LOC, which is pivotal in achieving comprehensive SE.
2. Fostering Supportive School Cultures
Efforts should be made to cultivate school cultures that encourage innovation and consensus. These cultural traits can significantly amplify the positive effects of leadership competencies on school performance.
3. Balanced Resource Allocation
It is essential to ensure balanced resource allocation, avoiding overemphasizing specific LOC or cultural traits at the expense of other critical dimensions. A holistic approach to leadership and culture will help maximize SE.
By integrating these strategies, schools can enhance their capacity to address the unique challenges of experimental education and foster environments conducive to innovation and effectiveness.
Keywords:state-run experimental elementary school, principals’ leadership occupational competency, school effectiveness, school’s organizational culture, experimental education
《Full Text》
References:余曉雯(2020)。德國二所另類學校—耶拿計畫學校與蒙特梭利學校—參訪記要與思考。教育實踐與研究,33(2),131-170。
【Yu, H.-W. (2020). Interview notes and reflections on visits of two alternative schools in Germany– A Jenaplan School and a Montessori School. Journal of Educational Practice and Research, 33(2), 131-170.】
吳勁甫(2018)。校長正向領導、教師組織公民行為與學校效能關係之後設分析。教育科學期刊,17(2),1-31。
【Wu, J.-F. (2018). The relationships among principals’ positive leadership, teachers’ organizational citizenship behavior and school effectiveness: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Educational Science, 17(2), 1-31.】
吳勁甫(2020)。校長教學領導與學校效能之關係:近二十年來實徵研究之後設分析。教育政策論壇,23(1),59-90。https://doi.org/10.3966/156082982020022301003
【Wu, J.-F. (2020). The relationship between principals’ instructional leadership and school effectiveness: Meta-analysis of empirical studies in two decades. Educational Policy Forum, 23(1), 59-90. https://doi.org/ 10.3966/156082982020022301003】
吳政達、徐宗盛(2013)。學校效能實證研究方法之探析。教育研究月刊,232,18-34。https://doi.org/10.3966/168063602013080232002
【Wu, C.-T., & Hsu, T.-S. (2013). The analysis of quantitative methodologies in school effectiveness research. Journal of Education Research, 232, 18-34. https://doi.org/10.3966/168063602013080232002】
宋峻杰、曾大千(2020)。從公立學校實驗教育論公平正義之實踐。教育研究月刊,318,84-103。https://doi.org/10.3966/168063602020100318006
【Sung, C.-C., & Tseng, D.-C. (2020). Experimental education in public schools: Fairness and justice. Journal of Education Research, 318, 84-103. https://doi.org/10.3966/168063602020100318006】
» More
一、中文文獻
余曉雯(2020)。德國二所另類學校—耶拿計畫學校與蒙特梭利學校—參訪記要與思考。教育實踐與研究,33(2),131-170。
【Yu, H.-W. (2020). Interview notes and reflections on visits of two alternative schools in Germany– A Jenaplan School and a Montessori School. Journal of Educational Practice and Research, 33(2), 131-170.】
吳勁甫(2018)。校長正向領導、教師組織公民行為與學校效能關係之後設分析。教育科學期刊,17(2),1-31。
【Wu, J.-F. (2018). The relationships among principals’ positive leadership, teachers’ organizational citizenship behavior and school effectiveness: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Educational Science, 17(2), 1-31.】
吳勁甫(2020)。校長教學領導與學校效能之關係:近二十年來實徵研究之後設分析。教育政策論壇,23(1),59-90。https://doi.org/10.3966/156082982020022301003
【Wu, J.-F. (2020). The relationship between principals’ instructional leadership and school effectiveness: Meta-analysis of empirical studies in two decades. Educational Policy Forum, 23(1), 59-90. https://doi.org/ 10.3966/156082982020022301003】
吳政達、徐宗盛(2013)。學校效能實證研究方法之探析。教育研究月刊,232,18-34。https://doi.org/10.3966/168063602013080232002
【Wu, C.-T., & Hsu, T.-S. (2013). The analysis of quantitative methodologies in school effectiveness research. Journal of Education Research, 232, 18-34. https://doi.org/10.3966/168063602013080232002】
宋峻杰、曾大千(2020)。從公立學校實驗教育論公平正義之實踐。教育研究月刊,318,84-103。https://doi.org/10.3966/168063602020100318006
【Sung, C.-C., & Tseng, D.-C. (2020). Experimental education in public schools: Fairness and justice. Journal of Education Research, 318, 84-103. https://doi.org/10.3966/168063602020100318006】
李嘉年、鄭同僚(2019)。台灣實驗學校女性創辦人生命歷程之個案研究—以種籽親子實驗小學創辦人李雅卿為例。應用心理研究,70,279-316。https://doi.org/10.3966/ 156092512019060070008
【Lee, C.-N., & Cheng, T.-L. (2019). A case study of a Taiwanese experimental school female founder’s life: Li Ya-Qing, founder of the Seedling Experimental Elementary School. Research in Applied Psychology, 70, 279-316. https://doi.org/10.3966/156092512019060070008】
林錫恩、范熾文、石啟宏(2018)。學校型態實驗教育經營策略之探析。臺灣教育評論月刊,7(1),135-142。
【Lin, S.-E., Fan, C.-W., & Shih, C.-H. (2018). An analysis of operational strategies for school-based experimental education. Taiwan Educational Review Monthly, 7(1), 135-142.】
邱憲義、蕭佳純(2019)。高中教師教學風格與教學效能之相關研究─以教師專業發展為中介變項、學校組織文化為調節變項。當代教育研究季刊,27(1),39-78。https://doi.org/ 10.6151/CERQ.201903_27(1).0002
【Chiu, H.-Y., & Hsiao, C.-C. (2019). The study of the relationship between teachers’ teaching styles and teaching effectiveness in high schools-The mediating effects of teachers’ professional developments and the moderating effects of organizational cultures of schools. Contemporary Educational Research Quarterly, 27(1), 39-78. https://doi.org/10.6151/CERQ.201903_27(1).0002】
胡翠君、張存真(2023)。學校環境、教師背景與學生表現對偏鄉教師自我效能的影響。教育科學研究期刊,68(3),179-208。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202309_68(3).0006
【Hu, T.-C., & Chang, T.-J. (2023). The influence of school environment, teacher background and student performance on the self-efficacy of teachers in rural schools. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 68(3), 179-208. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202309_68(3).0006】
秦夢群、陳建志(2016)。國民小學組織內部行銷、知識管理與學校效能關係之研究。教育政策論壇,19(2),93-124。https://doi.org/10.3966/156082982016051902004
【Chin, M.-C., & Chen, C-C. (2016). Examining the relationships among organizational internal marketing, knowledge management, and school effectiveness in elementary schools. Educational Policy Forum, 19(2), 93-124. https://doi.org/10.3966/156082982016051902004】
教育部國民及學前教育署(2017)。106學年度學校型態實驗教育學校名單。https:// www.k12ea.gov.tw/files/nonschool/106學年度實驗教育名單.pdf
【K-12 Education Administration, Ministry of Education. (2017). List of experimental schools in 2017 academic years. https://www.k12ea.gov.tw/files/nonschool/106學年度實驗教育名單.pdf】
教育部國民及學前教育署(2022)。111學年度學校型態實驗教育學校名單。https://www.k12ea.gov.tw/files/common_unit_id/d8533636-0498-4fd6-b456-2bcda3a8 b4d9/doc/111%E5%AD%B8%E5%B9%B4%E5%BA%A6%E5%AF%A6%E9%A9%97%E6%
95%99%E8%82%B2%E5%AD%B8%E6%A0%A1%E5%90%8D%E5%96%AE.pdf
【K-12 Education Administration, Ministry of Education. (2022). List of experimental schools in 2022 academic year. https://www.k12ea.gov.tw/files/common_unit_id/d8533636-0498-4fd6-b456-2bcda3a8b4d9/doc/111%E5%AD%B8%E5%B9%B4%E5%BA%A6%E5%AF%A6%E9%A9%97%E6%95%99%E8%82%B2%E5%AD%B8%E6%A0%A1%E5%90%8D%E5%96%AE.pdf】
教育部國民及學前教育署(2023)。112學年度學校型態實驗教育學校名單。https://www.k12ea.gov.tw/files/common_unit_id/d8533636-0498-4fd6-b456-2bcda3a8b4d9/doc/112學年度實驗教育學校及機構名單.pdf
【K-12 Education Administration, Ministry of Education. (2023). List of experimental schools in 2023 academic year. https://www.k12ea.gov.tw/files/common_unit_id/d8533636-0498-4fd6-b456-2bcda3a8b4d9/doc/112學年度實驗教育學校及機構名單.pdf】
教育部統計處(2023)。高級中等以下學校實驗教育概況。http://stats.moe.gov.tw/ statedu/chart.aspx?pvalue=51
【Department of Statistics, Ministry of Education. (2023). Overview of experimental education across education levels below senior high school. http://stats.moe.gov.tw/statedu/chart.aspx?pvalue=51】
梁榮仁、范熾文(2020)。臺灣學校型態實驗教育品質保證的內涵與發展策略。教育研究月刊,315,41-56。https://doi.org/10.3966/168063602020070315003
【Liang, J.-J., & Fan, C.-W. (2020). A study of connotations and developmental implementations of quality assurance for school-based experimental education in Taiwan. Journal of Education Research, 315, 41-56. https://doi.org/ 10.3966/168063602020070315003】
陳巧芬、蔡文榮(2011)。臺灣近年來有關校長轉型領導與學校效能博碩士論文實徵研究之分析。教育科學期刊,10(1),125-150。https://doi.org/10.6388/JES.201106.0125
【Chen, C.-F., & Tsai, W.-R. (2011). The analysis and perspective on transformational leadership and school effectiveness in Taiwan in recent years. The Journal of Educational Science, 10(1), 125-150. https://doi.org/ 10.6388/JES.201106.0125】
陳建志、秦夢群(2023)。公辦公營實驗教育中小學校長領導職能指標建構之研究。教育政策論壇,26(4),59-94。https://doi.org/10.53106/156082982023112604003
【Chen, C.-C., & Chin, M.-C. (2023). Constructing indicators of leadership competencies of principals of state-run elementary and secondary experimental schools in Taiwan. Educational Policy Forum, 26(4), 59-94. https:// doi.org/10.53106/156082982023112604003】
陳殷哲、張毓慧(2019)。校長領導研究之統合分析。教育研究月刊,299,126-143。https://doi.org/10.3966/168063602019030299008
【Chen, Y.-C., & Chang, Y.-H. (2019). A meta-analysis for principal leadership studies. Journal of Education Research, 299, 126-143. https://doi.org/10.3966/168063602019030299008】
陳榮政(2019)。教育行政與治理:新管理主義途徑。學富。
【Chen, J.-C. (2019). Educational administration and governance: A new managerialism approach. Pro-ED.】
陳榮政(2021)。我國實驗教育實徵研究之分析與展望。教育研究與發展期刊,17(4),69-96。https://doi.org/10.6925/SCJ.202112_17(4).0003
【Chen, J.-C. (2021). The study and prospect of empirical researches of experimental education in Taiwan. Journal of Educational Research and Development, 17(4), 69-96. https://doi.org/10.6925/SCJ.202112_17(4).0003】
陳榮政、林信志、謝知庭(2022)。臺灣實驗教育政策的實施與討論度分析─文字探勘之應用。教育與心理研究,45(1),53-93。https://doi.org/10.53106/102498852022034501003
【Chen, J.-C., Lin, S.-C., & Hsieh, C.-T. (2022). A study of experimental education policy and its analysis of the degree of discussion in Taiwan: Application of text mining. Journal of Education & Psychology, 45(1), 53-93. https://doi.org/10.53106/102498852022034501003】
曾若玫、范熾文(2019)。國民小學校長正向領導與學校效能關係之研究:以教師學術樂觀為中介。學校行政,121,33-52。https://doi.org/10.6423/HHHC.201905_(121).0002
【Tseng, J.-M., & Fan, C.-W. (2019). A study on the relationship between principals’ positive leadership, and school effectiveness in elementary schools: Teacher academic optimism as mediator. School Administrators, 121, 33-52. https://doi.org/10.6423/HHHC.201905_(121).0002】
溫福星、邱皓政(2009)。組織研究中的多層次調節式中介效果:以組織創新氣氛、組織承諾與工作滿意的實證研究為例。管理學報,26(2),189-211。https://doi.org/10.6504/ JOM.2009.26.02.05
【Wen, F.-H., & Chiou, H.-J. (2009). Multilevel moderated mediation of organizational study: An empirical analysis of organizational innovation climate, organizational commitment and job satisfaction. Journal of Management, 26(2), 189-211. https://doi.org/10.6504/JOM.2009.26.02.05】
蕭佳純(2022)。創意自我效能、工作價值觀對教師創造力教學影響之研究:專業學習社群與教師信任的跨層次分析。教育科學研究期刊,67(1),255-289。https://doi.org/10.6209/ JORIES.202203_67(1).0009
【Hsiao, C.-C. (2022). Effects of creative self-efficacy and work value on creative teaching: A cross-level analysis of professional learning communities and teachers’ trust. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 67(1), 255-289. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202203_67(1).0009】
蕭錫錡、吳建鋒、黃天助(2010)。「教育部校長領導卓越獎」高級職業學校得獎校長領導職能模式之建構。教育政策論壇,13(4),33-67。
【Hsiao, H.-C., Wu, C.-F., & Huang, T.-C. (2010). Developing a leadership competency model through outstanding leadership award of vocational school principals by the job competence assessment method. Educational Policy Forum, 13(4), 33-67.】
謝傳崇(2020)。臺灣正向領導的研究成果分析。教育研究月刊,317,19-34。https://doi.org/10.3966/168063602020090317002
【Hsieh, C.-C. (2020). The research analysis of the positive leadership in Taiwan. Journal of Education Research, 317, 19-34. https://doi.org/10.3966/168063602020090317002】
謝傳崇、黃秋萍、余惠瑄(2020)。國民小學正向教育、教師幸福感與學校效能關係之研究。教育與心理研究,43(1),33-62。https://doi.org/10.3966/102498852020034301002
【Hsieh, C.-C., Huang, C.-P., & Yu, H.-H. (2020). A study on the relationships among positive education, teachers’ well-being and school effectiveness in elementary schools. Journal of Education & Psychology, 43(1), 33-62. https://doi.org/10.3966/102498852020034301002】
顏國樑、任育騰(2013)。透過組織公平與組織信任提升學校效能。教育研究月刊,232,48-64。https://doi.org/10.3966/168063602013080232004
【Yen, K.-L., & Jen, Y.-T. (2013). Through organizational justice, organizational trust to enhance school effectiveness. Journal of Education Research, 232, 48-64. https://doi.org/10.3966/168063602013080232004】
二、外文文獻
Afshartous, D., & de Leeuw, J. (2005). Prediction in multilevel models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 30(2), 109-139. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986030002109
Aldaihani, S. G. (2019). Distributed leadership applications in high schools in the State of Kuwait from teachers’ viewpoints. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 23(3), 355-370. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2018.1562096
Ali, N., Sharma, S., & Zaman, A. (2016). School culture and school effectiveness: Secondary schools in Pakistan. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Management, 4(4), 50-65. https://doi.org/10.22452/mojem.vol4no4.4
Alkhawaldeh, M. A., & Khasawneh, M. A. S. (2023). The degree of human competencies among secondary school principals. Migration Letters, 20(S2), 1048-1060. https:// migrationletters.com/index.php/ml/article/view/4490
Amels, J., Krüger, M., & van Veen, K. (2020). Relationships in distributed leadership, inquiry-based working, and realizing educational change in Dutch primary education: Teachers’ and their school leader’s perceptions. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 26(6), 960-979. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2020.1842505
Bhengu, T. T., & Mthembu, T. T. (2014). Effective leadership, school culture and school effectiveness: A case study of two “sister” schools in Umlazi Township. Journal of Social Sciences, 38(1), 43-52.
Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (2011). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework. John Wiley & Sons.
Chen, C. C. (2024). Practice of leadership competencies by a principal: Case study of a public experimental school in Taiwan. Asia Pacific Education Review, 25(2), 159-170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-022-09813-1
Cheng, M. W. L., & Au, K. (2005). Applications of multilevel structural equation modeling into cross-cultural research. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 12(4), 598-619. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1204_5
Choi, Y., Lee, S., & Oh, H. (2024). From the best practices of successful school leaders: Developing and validating the principal competencies inventory in South Korea. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 52(3), 686-710. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432221082914
Cofsky, K. M. (1993). Critical keys to competency-based pay. Compensation and Benefits Review, 25(6), 46-52. https://doi.org/10.1177/088636879302500609
Dimmock, C., Tan, C. Y., Nguyen, D., Tran, T. A., & Dinh, T. T. (2021). Implementing education system reform: Local adaptation in school reform of teaching and learning. International Journal of Educational Development, 80, 2-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102302
Duan, X., Du, X., & Yu, K. (2018). School culture and school effectiveness: The mediating effect of teachers’ job satisfaction. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 17(5), 15-25. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.17.5.2
Epple, D., Romano, R., & Zimmer, R. (2015). Charter schools: A survey of research on their characteristics and effectiveness (NBER Working Paper No. 21256). National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/papers/w21256
Hellriegel, D., Jackson, S. E., & Slocum, J. W. (2005). Management: A competency-based approach (8th ed.). South-Western.
Hox, J. J. (2002). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410604118
Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2013). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
James, L. R. (1982). Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(2), 219-229. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.67.2.219
Kline, R. B. (2023). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (5th ed.). Guilford.
Kreft, I. G. G. (1996). Are multilevel techniques necessary? An overview, including simulation studies [Manuscript]. California State University, Los Angeles.
Ladd, H. F., & Singleton, J. D. (2020). The fiscal externalities of charter schools: Evidence from North Carolina. Education Finance and Policy, 15(1), 191-208. https://doi.org/10.1162/ edfp_a_00272
Leithwood, K. (2017). The Ontario leadership framework: Successful school leadership practices and personal leadership resources. In K. Leithwood, J. Sun, & K. Pollock (Eds.), How school leaders contribute to student success (pp. 31-43). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-3-319-50980-8_3
Leithwood, K., & Sun, J. (2018). Academic culture: A promising mediator of school leaders’ influence on student learning. Journal of Educational Administration, 56(3), 350-363. https:// doi.org/10.1108/JEA-01-2017-0009
Liu, Y., Bellibas¸ M. S., & Gumus¸ S. (2021). The effect of instructional leadership and distributed leadership on teacher self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Mediating roles of supportive school culture and teacher collaboration. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(3), 430-453. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220910438
Maas, C. J. M., & Hox, J. J. (2005). Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 1(3), 86-92. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241.1.3.86
Mohamad, M., Ramly, M. A, Pihie, Z. A. L., & Basri, R. (2017). The Mediating effect of school culture in the relationship between instructional leadership and school academic achievement. Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 3(11), 79-87.
Mohamad, M., Yasin, M. M., Ramly, M. A, Pihie, Z. A. L., & Basri, R. (2017). The Mediating effect of school culture in the relationship between instructional leadership and school academic achievement. Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 3(11), 79-87.
Muthén, B. O., & Satorra, A. (1995). Complex sample data in structural equation modeling. Sociological Methodology, 25, 267-316. https://doi.org/10.2307/271070
Pont, B., Nusche, D., & Moorman, H. (2008). Improving school leadership (Vol 1: Policy and practice). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264044715-en
Sagan, A. (2019). Sample size in multilevel structural equation modeling– The Monte Carlo approach. Econometrics, 23(4), 63-79. https://doi.org/10.15611/eada.2019.4.05
Schein, E. H. (2004). Organizational culture and leadership (3rd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Shaked, H. (2025). How principals’ instructional leadership impacts schools’ middle leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 53(5), 977-990. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/17411432241238888
Spencer, L. M., & Spencer, S. M. (1993). Competency at work: Models for superior performance. John Wiley & Sons.
Syahid, S., Syarifuddin, E., & Gunawan, A. (2024). Investigating the relationship between organizational culture, compensation, spiritual leadership, and teacher performance in private Islamic elementary schools. International Journal of Science Education and Cultural Studies, 3(1), 19-32. https://doi.org/10.58291/ijsecs.v3i1.208
Tortorella, G. L., Fettermann, D., Fogliatto, F. S., Kumar, M., & Jurburg, D. (2020). Analysing the influence of organisational culture and leadership styles on the implementation of lean manufacturing. Production Planning & Control, 32(15), 1282-1294. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 09537287.2020.1799255
Tseng, H. K., Hsieh, C. C., & Chen, J. C. (2021). Practice and reflection of principals’ transformative curriculum leadership in a Taiwan KIST school. KEDI Journal of Educational Policy, 18(2), 65-83. https://doi.org/10.22804/kjep.2021.18.2.004
Wallach, E. J. (1983). Individuals and organization: The culture match. Training and Development Journal, 37(2), 28-36.
Wong, Y. H. P. (2007). Kindergarten teachers’ perceived school culture and well-being: A comparison of non-profit-making and profit-making kindergartens. Early Child Development and Care, 180(3), 271-278. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430701769019