Journal directory listing - Vol.67(2022) - Journal of Research in Education Sciences【67(4)】December

Exploring the Multilevel Mediation Effects of Teacher Collaboration on the Correlation Between Principal Instructional Leadership and Teacher Self-Efficacy: Education Level as a Moderator Author: Tsung-Jen Chang (Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling, National Taiwan Normal University), Yao-Ting Sung (Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling, National Taiwan Normal University), Haw-Jeng Chiou (Department of Business Administration, National Taiwan Normal University)

Vol.&No.:Vol. 67, No. 4
Date:December 2022

Principal instructional leadership and teacher collaboration are key characteristics of effective schools (Scheerens, 1990; Teddlie & Reynolds, 2000) and the primary factors that influence teacher self-efficacy. On the basis of the definition provided by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD, 2018), the present study defined principal instructional leadership as the process of supporting and developing high-quality instructional practices, developing and implementing policies that support student achievements, developing learning communities, providing feedback on instructions, modeling effective instructions, and supporting the use of assessment data. Teacher collaboration refers to the process through which teachers exchange information with their colleagues and learn from each other (Geijsel et al., 2009). The concept of self-efficacy is based on social cognitive theory proposed by Bandura (1977). In the present study, teacher self-efficacy was defined as the competence of teachers to effectively address problems in their classrooms and schools and improve the quality of their teaching, which could eventually improve the learning outcomes of their students (Ainley & Carstens, 2018; Battersby & Cave, 2014; Geijsel et al., 2009; Tschannen-Moran & Hoy, 2001).
Principal instructional leadership is crucial for high-quality education and schools’ success. Principals are responsible for shaping the work environments of teachers; thus, they can strengthen and promote teacher collaboration. A supportive school environment can improve teachers’ self-efficacy. The aim of this was to elucidate the direct and indirect through teacher collaboration — effects of principal instructional leadership on teacher self-efficacy. Because teaching is profoundly influenced by school culture and environmental factors, work pressure at different education levels may create different work environments and exert different effects on principal instructional leadership and teacher collaboration. Therefore, we performed additional analyses regarding the contextual moderating effects of education levels (International Standard Classification of Education, ISCED).
This study performed a secondary data analysis by using the OECD Teaching and Learning International Survey (2018) dataset. The sample included principals and teachers from elementary (200 and 3,494, respectively), junior high (202 and 3,835, respectively), and high (151 and 2,800, respectively) schools in Taiwan.
Multilevel linear modeling was performed to investigate relationships between principal instructional leadership, teacher collaboration, and teacher self-efficacy in these schools. Teacher collaboration at the individual level and principal instructional leadership at the overall level were used as independent variables to evaluate the effects of both levels on teacher self-efficacy.
1. Teacher Collaboration Exerts a Direct and Contextual Effect on Teacher Self-efficacy
The analysis results revealed a positive relationship between individual- and school-level teacher collaboration and individual-level teacher self-efficacy, indicating that a higher level of teacher collaboration is related to higher perceptions of self-efficacy among teachers; these results supported the study assumption. These two variables were related at both the individual and school levels, which suggests that the use of both individual- and school-level variables is a precise approach for evaluating collaboration.
2. Principal Instructional Leadership Exerts as a Significant Effect (p < .05) on Teacher Collaboration
Principal instructional leadership had a positive and significant direct effect on teacher collaboration. This demonstrates that principal instructional leadership encourages teachers to be productive in their classes, share their ideas with others, and create a cooperative culture.
3. Teacher Collaboration Significantly Mediates the Correlation Between Principal Instructional Leadership and Teacher Self-efficacy
Principal instructional leadership exerted a significant indirect effect on teacher self-efficacy through teacher collaboration. Thus, principal instructional leadership may play a key role in teacher collaboration and indirectly enhance teachers’ self-efficacy through teacher collaboration.
4. Moderating Effect of Education Level on the Correlation Between Principal Instructional Leadership and Teacher Collaboration
Education level (ISCED) positively moderated the relationship between principal instructional leadership and teacher collaboration. The relationship between principal instructional leadership and teacher collaboration was found to be significant in elementary and junior high schools but nonsignificant in high schools.
Studies have reported principal instructional leadership as an imperative predictor of teacher self-efficacy. However, few studies have focused on the indirect effects of mediating variables, such as teacher collaboration, on the relationship between principal instructional leadership and teacher self-efficacy. Accordingly, this study comprehensively analyzed various school and teacher factors by using a single model and evaluated the effects of teacher collaboration on the relationship between principal instructional leadership and teacher self-efficacy from a multilevel perspective. Principal instructional leadership was found to be associated with teacher self-efficacy, both directly and indirectly, through teacher collaboration.
1. Implications for Educational Practice
On the basis of the findings, this study proposes some recommendations for strengthening teacher collaboration, promoting teachers’ professional development, and creating a supportive work environment to enhance teacher self-efficacy. Principal instructional leadership is crucial; nevertheless, because principals in Taiwan are administrators and not teachers, they rarely have time to invest in the professional development of teachers. Furthermore, to engage more strongly in instructional and staff development, principals must possess relevant skills. Policymakers should develop training and professional development programs for principals that are centered on the aforementioned topics.
2. Methodological Implications
Preacher et al. (2010) indicated that in a mediation model for 2-1-1 data, when the b effect (the effect of a mediator on a dependent variable) conflates the within and between effects, the indirect effect that necessarily operates between two groups is confounded by the within-group portion of the conflated b effect. This study compared the analysis results of the 2-1-1 unconflated and conflated models to determine the difference between the individual and overall mediating effects of teacher collaboration. The study findings support those of Preacher et al. (2010) in that the between and within effects of a mediator must be separated when a multilevel mediation model is used.

Keywords:unconflated model, principal instructional leadership, teacher self-efficacy, teacher collaboration, Teaching and Learning International Survey

《Full Text》 檔名

  1. 丁一顧(2014)。教師專業學習社群之調查研究:「關注學生學習成效」為焦點。課程與教學季刊,17(1),209-232。【Ding, Y.-K. (2014). A study of teachers’ professional learning communities focusing on students’ achievement. Curriculum & Instruction Quarterly, 17(1), 209-232.】
  2. 吳清山(2002)。當前教育改革的迷思與省思。學校行政,17,2-9。【Wu, C.-S. (2002). Myths and reflections on current educational reform. School Administrators, 17, 2-9. https://doi. org/10.6423/HHHC.200201.0002】
  3. 李安明(2012)。校長教學領導之改善、學生學習成就及學生學習測驗成績之研究。教育行政研究,2(1),21-67。 【Li, A.-M. (2012). A study of the improvement of principal instructional leadership, student academic achievement, and student test score. Journal of Education Administration Research, 2(1), 21-67. 222350002012060201002】
  4. 李安明(2016)。國民小學校長教學領導運作之責任探究:以新竹縣市3所國小為例。教育行政論壇,8(1),1-33。【Li, A.-M. (2016). A field study on the practice of accountability of three elementary school principal instructional leadership in Hsinchu City and County. Forum of Educational Administration, 8(1), 1-33.】
  5. 李安明、謝傳崇(2011)。書評-《校長教學領導:理論與實踐》。當代教育研究,19(3),161-175。【Li, A.-M., & Hsieh, C.-C. (2011). A book review on Militello, M., Rallis, S. F., & Goldring, E. B., leading with inquiry & action: How principals improve teaching and learning. Contemporary Educational Research Quarterly, 19(3), 161-175.】
» More
APA FormatChang, T.-J., Sung, Y.-T., & Chiou, H.-J. (2022). Exploring the Multilevel Mediation Effects of Teacher Collaboration on the Correlation Between Principal Instructional Leadership and Teacher Self-Efficacy: Education Level as a Moderator. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 67(4), 35-72.