Needs Assessment of Cross-Border Teachers’ Professional Development Under the Southbound Policy: Case Study of Five Malaysian-Chinese Independent Secondary Schools
Author: Karen Hui-Jung Chen (Department of Education, National Taipei University of Education), Lin-Hui Lee (Tzu Chi Senior High School Affiliated with Tzu Chi University)
Vol.&No.:Vol. 66, No. 3
Date:September 2021
Pages:107-159
DOI:https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202109_66(3).0004
Abstract:
Under the New Southbound policy, the government of Taiwan is promoting the exchange and cultivation of bilateral talents with the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, in which Malaysia is included. Although Malaysian organizations have been devoted to enhancing the professional development of schoolteachers for years, room for improvement remains, especially for those in Chinese independent secondary schools. Teacher universities in Taiwan are cooperating with these secondary schools by accepting Malaysian students for teacher education, in addition to providing workshops or degree programs to in-service teachers for professional development. However, most teacher education programs in Taiwan are designed for preparing teachers to fulfill compulsory education needs. The challenge is to help those who are willing to become cross-border teachers enhance their teaching profession while maintaining program quality to meet requirements and standards.
The aim of this study was to assess the professional development needs of teachers in Chinese independent secondary schools in Malaysia; the study particularly focused on the teachers who have become independent secondary schoolteachers after receiving teacher education in Taiwanese universities and those who received diplomas from other countries but received teacher training from the universities in Taiwan. Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) and discrepancy analysis were used to perform a needs assessment. IPA has been applied to various areas in education and service industries. Previous studies have proved that combining IPA and discrepancy analysis can improve research validity (Hudson et al., 2004). Therefore, this study applied IPA and discrepancy analysis simultaneously to determine the key factors necessary for more effective professional development. In addition, this study referred to the theoretical framework of teacher professional development in Furner and McCulla (2019) and expanded the environmental factors by adding the influence of national context to explore the cross-border teachers’ professional development needs. Accordingly, two research questions were investigated in this study: (1) What are the differences between the performance and importance (expectation) levels of independent middle school teachers? (2) Under the influence of environmental factors and different time spans in teaching experiences, what are the differences in teachers’ professional development needs?
On the basis of previous studies (Day & Gu, 2007; Furner & McCulla, 2019), this study established a two-dimensional framework to analyze the key factors influencing teachers’ professional development. The vertical dimension was related to personal, organizational (school), and social (country) environmental factors. This study explored how and the mechanism through which these three-level environmental factors shape teachers’ professional development needs. The horizontal dimension was related to a teacher’s career stage and focused on how teachers change their professional development needs at each of their career stages.
This study utilized surveys, individual interviews, and focus group interviews for data collection. The survey consisted seven pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) attributes and each of them was rated for its importance and performance level by the schoolteachers themselves. A total of 140 responses were returned, and 69 teachers and administrators were interviewed. For data analysis, this study combined IPA and discrepancy analysis to assess needs and determine the improvement priorities. A data-centered diagonal-line model based on previous studies (Abalo et al., 2007; Wyród-Wróbel & Biesok, 2017) was applied. Performance scores were plotted on the X-axis, and importance scores related to the attributes were plotted on the Y-axis. The data center point (means of importance and performance) was selected as the crosshair to construct a two-dimensional plot. A diagonal line was drawn to meet the data center point to divide the traditional IPA graph into six areas. The area above the diagonal lines was considered to represent an improvement-requiring zone and was further divided into three areas: concentrate here, warning, and improvement areas. The area below the diagonal line was the same as that established in the traditional IPA described by Martilla and James (1977); this area was further divided into three areas: low priority, keep up the good work, and possible overkill areas. After conducting the IPA, this study utilized discrepancy analysis to obtain more information on the differences between importance (expectation) and performance by applying a paired-sample t-test to examine whether a significant discrepancy existed.
The study results revealed that national context affected teacher learning. Teachers who graduated from local universities in Malaysia revealed less need for teaching strategies compared with those who studied abroad in Taiwan. However, teachers who received cross-border degrees in Taiwan and China displayed similar learning demands, except that the demand for P3 (subject knowledge) was lower for teachers who graduated from universities in Taiwan than for those who graduated from universities in China.
Regarding school context, teachers’ professional development needs were different in the case study schools. Teachers at three case study schools (A, B, and E) had similar learning needs, but those at the other two schools (C and D) had different needs. The principal of school D devoted his efforts to engage teachers in school-based professional development. By participating in intra- and inter-disciplinary meetings, teachers cooperated in developing new courses and jointly designed new teaching methods. Therefore, teachers’ demand for teaching strategies was lower than other attributes. School C, located in east Malaysia, had a different culture and school context compared with those in west Malaysia. Many students left school in east Malaysia before graduation to prepare for studying abroad or obtaining jobs. Because students’ learning motivation and learning needs were different from those in west Malaysia, this special school context influenced teachers’ professional development needs in school C.
Concerning personal factors, teachers teaching Chinese exhibited lower demands for professional development in teaching strategies than did other subject teachers. Provided with self-study materials, the teachers spent more time trying innovative teaching strategies and teaching students higher-order thinking skills. Therefore, teachers’ learning demands for teaching strategies were relatively low.
Teachers’ learning needs at different career stages were determined to be influenced by environmental factors. According to the literature, early career teachers focus on developing classroom management strategies (Furner & McCulla, 2019); however, this study revealed different results. Novice teachers with less than 3 years of teaching experience had a high demand for professional growth in subject knowledge but low demand for class management. According to the interviews, the low demand was because the teachers had participated in several workshops in classroom management during orientation trainings. Experienced teachers (4-7 years of teaching experience), as reported by Furner and McCulla (2019), still concentrate on learning classroom management skills but gradually shift to enhance their instructional strategies. However, this study determined that teachers at a later career stage had a high demand for teaching strategies but no demand for class management. Teachers with more than 21 years of experience exhibited a high demand for teaching strategies, which is similar to the observations by Day and Gu (2007).
This study revealed that the three-level (personal, school, and national) environmental factors and different career stages influenced the needs of professional development. Applying IPA and discrepancy analysis to conduct needs assessment can help execute a comprehensive examination of the needs of cross-border teacher learning. One-size-fits-all professional development cannot fulfill teachers’ learning needs. Instead, providing teachers with various professional development programs by considering their academic qualifications, teaching experiences, and school contexts is valuable. The results of the study will be provided to the teacher education programs for universities in Taiwan as well as for the government to assess the implementation of educational policies.
Keywords:importance-performance analysis, teacher professional knowledge, teacher professional development, cross-border teacher education, needs assessment
《Full Text》
References:
- 王淑慧(2015)。馬來西亞華文獨立中學教師在職進修之教育專業文憑課程。臺灣教育評論月刊,4(3),67-73。 【Wang, S.-H. (2015). Education degree programs for in-service teachers of the Chinese independent high schools in Malaysia. Taiwan Educational Review Monthly, 4(3), 67-73.】
- 行政院(2016)。新南向政策推動計畫。https://www.ey.gov.tw/Page/5A8A0CB5B41DA11E/86f143fa-8441-4914-8349-c474afe0d44e 【Executive Yuan. (2016). The promotion plan of new southbound policy. https://www.ey.gov.tw/Page/5A8A0CB5B41DA11E/86f143fa-8441-4914-8349-c474afe0d44e】
- 吳佳美(2015)。經驗對話減少冤枉路:馬來西亞華文獨立中學教師專業學習社群之個案研究(未出版碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。 【Ng, A. K. M. (2015). The shortcut to professionals: A case study on professional learning community of Chinese independent school in Malaysia [Unpublished master’s thesis]. National Taiwan Normal University.】
- 吳璧如、蕭開薇(2017)。馬來西亞師資培育之發展、現況與挑戰。載於溫明麗(主編),亞洲教育的挑戰與展望(頁137-165)。國家教育研究院。 【Wu, P.-J., & Siau, H.-W. (2017). Teacher education in Malaysia: Development, status quo, and challenges. In M.-L. Wen (Ed.), Challenges and prospects of Asian education (pp. 137-165). National Academy for Educational Research.】
- 李淑玲、闕月清(2006)。台北市國民中學體育教師專業成長現況及需求之差異研究。輔仁大學體育學刊,5,15-30。https://doi.org/10.29697/JPE.200605.0004 【Lee, S.-L., & Nyit, C.-K. (2006). Professional growth situation and needs of physical education teachers in the junior high schools in Taipei City. Journal of Physical Education Fu Jen Catholic University, 5, 15-30. https://doi.org/10.29697/JPE.200605.0004】
» More
- 王淑慧(2015)。馬來西亞華文獨立中學教師在職進修之教育專業文憑課程。臺灣教育評論月刊,4(3),67-73。 【Wang, S.-H. (2015). Education degree programs for in-service teachers of the Chinese independent high schools in Malaysia. Taiwan Educational Review Monthly, 4(3), 67-73.】
- 行政院(2016)。新南向政策推動計畫。https://www.ey.gov.tw/Page/5A8A0CB5B41DA11E/86f143fa-8441-4914-8349-c474afe0d44e 【Executive Yuan. (2016). The promotion plan of new southbound policy. https://www.ey.gov.tw/Page/5A8A0CB5B41DA11E/86f143fa-8441-4914-8349-c474afe0d44e】
- 吳佳美(2015)。經驗對話減少冤枉路:馬來西亞華文獨立中學教師專業學習社群之個案研究(未出版碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。 【Ng, A. K. M. (2015). The shortcut to professionals: A case study on professional learning community of Chinese independent school in Malaysia [Unpublished master’s thesis]. National Taiwan Normal University.】
- 吳璧如、蕭開薇(2017)。馬來西亞師資培育之發展、現況與挑戰。載於溫明麗(主編),亞洲教育的挑戰與展望(頁137-165)。國家教育研究院。 【Wu, P.-J., & Siau, H.-W. (2017). Teacher education in Malaysia: Development, status quo, and challenges. In M.-L. Wen (Ed.), Challenges and prospects of Asian education (pp. 137-165). National Academy for Educational Research.】
- 李淑玲、闕月清(2006)。台北市國民中學體育教師專業成長現況及需求之差異研究。輔仁大學體育學刊,5,15-30。https://doi.org/10.29697/JPE.200605.0004 【Lee, S.-L., & Nyit, C.-K. (2006). Professional growth situation and needs of physical education teachers in the junior high schools in Taipei City. Journal of Physical Education Fu Jen Catholic University, 5, 15-30. https://doi.org/10.29697/JPE.200605.0004】
- 沈剛衛(2015)。文化資本對馬來西亞獨立中學學生學業成就影響之研究:以馬來西亞柔佛州九所獨立中學為例(未出版碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。 【Sim, K. W. (2015). The impact of culture capital on academic achievement of Malaysia’s Chinese independent high school students: The nine Chinese independent high schools in Johor as the example [Unpublished master’s thesis]. National Taiwan Normal University.】
- 林淑梤、張惠博、段曉林(2008)。科學實習教師個人實務理論實踐之探究。師大學報:科學教育類,53(2),1-29。https://doi.org/10.6300/JNTNU.2008.53(2).01 【Lin, S.-F., Chang, H.-P., & Tuan, H.-L. (2008). A study of implementation of science mentees’ personal practical theories. Journal of National Taiwan Normal University: Science Education, 53(2), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.6300/JNTNU.2008.53(2).01】
- 柯華葳、陳明蕾、李俊仁、陳冠銘(2019)。2018教學與學習國際調查臺灣報告:綜整報告。國家教育研究院。 【Ko, H.-W., Chen, M.-L., Lee, J.-R., & Chen, K.-M. (2019). Teaching and learning international survey (TALIS) 2018 Taiwan report: Elementary, junior high, & senior high educations. National Academy for Educational Research.】
- 徐如宜(2019,5月2日)。大馬獨中董總與高師大合辦教育專業文憑課程開花結果。聯合新聞網。https://udn.com/news/story/6885/3789781 【Shiu, R.-Y. (2019, May 2). The United Chinese School Committees Association of Malaysia and the National Kaohsiung Normal University jointly organized an education professional diploma program and finally achieved the results. United Daily News. https://udn.com/news/story/6885/3789781】
- 馬來西亞(無日期)。維基百科。https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malaysia 【Malaysia. (n.d.). In Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malaysia】
- 馬來西亞華校董事聯合會總會(2018)。馬來西亞華文獨中教育藍圖完整版。https://dzblueprint.dongzong.my/teaching-reform/dzblueprint/reform-2 【United Chinese Schools Committees’ Association of Malaysia. (2018). Education blueprint complete version of the Malaysia Chinese independent secondary school. https://dzblueprint.dongzong.my/teaching-reform/dzblueprint/reform-2】
- 馬來西亞華校董事聯合會總會(2019)。2018年全國華文獨立中學教師基本資料統計。https://resource.dongzong.my/index.php/literature-n-information/education-statistics/1547-statistics-53 【United Chinese Schools Committees’ Association of Malaysia. (2019). Basic statistics of teachers of Chinese independent secondary schools in 2018. https://resource.dongzong.my/index.php/literature-n-information/education-statistics/1547-statistics-53】
- 教育部(2017)。教育部新南向人才培育推動計畫。https://www.edu.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=D33B55D537402BAA&s=04395417836BAB59 【Ministry of Education. (2017). New southbound talent development promotion plan of the Ministry of Education. https://www.edu.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=D33B55D537402BAA&s=04395417836BAB59】
- 陳彥廷(2014)。「國小教師數學教學知識(MPCK)知覺量表」發展之探究。測驗學刊,61(1),51-78。 【Chen, Y.-T. (2014). Developing a perception instrument of mathematics pedagogical content knowledge for elementary school teachers. Psychological Testing, 61(1), 51-78.】
- 黃嘉莉、葉怡芬、許瑛玿、曾元顯(2017)。取得中學教職的關鍵因素:運用決策樹探勘師資培育歷程。教育科學研究期刊,62(2),89-123。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.2017.62(2).04 【Huang, J.-L., Yeh, Y.-F., Hsu, Y.-S., & Tseng, Y.-H. (2017). Critical factors of becoming secondary school teachers: Mining the process of teacher education by decision trees. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 62(2), 89-123. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.2017.62(2).04】
- 黃禎玉(2013)。馬來西亞華文獨立中學「校本教師專業發展」之現況。教育資料集刊,58,25-42。 【Huang, C.-Y. (2013). School-based teacher professional development in Malaysia Chinese independent secondary schools. Journal of Educational Information, 58, 25-42.】
- 黃德祥、魏麗敏(2018)。馬來西亞獨立中學的發展與挑戰。教育研究月刊,291,97-108。https://doi.org/10.3966/168063602018070291007 【Huang, D.-H., & Wei, L.-M. (2018). Development and challenges of independent high schools in Malaysia. Journal of Education Research, 291, 97-108. https://doi.org/10.3966/168063602018070291007】
- 劉怡薰、宋曜廷(2020)。中等學校師資生任教學科專門知識檢測機制之探討。教育科學研究期刊,65(2),167-194。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202006_65(2).0006 【Liu, I.-H., & Sung, Y.-T. (2020). Inspection and proposal for evaluating secondary school teacher students’ content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 65(2), 167-194. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202006_65(2).0006】
- 蔡培村(主編)(1996)。教師生涯與職級制度。麗文文化。 【Tsai, P.-T. (Ed.). (1996). Teacher career development and career ladder. Liwen.】
- Abalo, J., Varela, J., & Manzano, V. (2007). Importance values for importance-performance analysis: A formula for spreading out values derived from preference rankings. Journal of Business Research, 60(2), 115-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.10.009
- Abell, S. K. (2008). Twenty years later: Does pedagogical content knowledge remain a useful idea? International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1405-1416. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802187041
- Altschuld, J. W., & Kumar, D. D. (2010). Needs assessment: An overview. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452256795
- Azzopardi, E., & Nash, R. (2013). A critical evaluation of importance-performance analysis. Tourism Management, 35, 222-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2012.07.007
- Bacon, D. R. (2003). A comparison of approaches to importance-performance analysis. International Journal of Market Research, 45(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/147078530304500101
- Belland, B. R., Burdo, R., & Gu, J. (2015). A blended professional development program to help a teacher learn to provide one-to-one scaffolding. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(3), 263-289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-015-9419-2
- Berry, A., Loughran, J., & van Driel, J. H. (2008). Revisiting the roots of pedagogical content knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1271-1279. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690801998885
- Burns, D., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2014). Teaching around the world: What can TALIS tell us? Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education. https://edpolicy.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/publications/teaching-around-world-what-can-talis-tell-us_3.pdf
- Carlson, J., Stokes, L., Helms, J., Gess-Newsome, J., & Gardner, A. (2015). The PCK summit: A process and structure for challenging current ideas, provoking future work, and considering new directions. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 14-27). Routledge.
- Chen, K. H.-J. (2017). Contextual influence on evaluation capacity building in a rapidly changing environment under new governmental policies. Evaluation and Program Planning, 65, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.06.001
- Choi, H., Ann, S., Lee, K.-W., & Park, D.-B. (2018). Measuring service quality of rural accommodations. Sustainability, 10(2), 443. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020443
- Cochran, K. F., DeRuiter, J. A., & King, R. A. (1993). Pedagogical content knowing: An integrative model for teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 44(4), 263-272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487193044004004
- Dall’Alba, G., & Sandberg, J. (2006). Unveiling professional development: A critical review of stage models. Review of Educational Research, 76(3), 383-412. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543076003383
- Day, C., & Gu, Q. (2007). Variations in the conditions for teachers’ professional learning and development: Sustaining commitment and effectiveness over a career. Oxford Review of Education, 33(4), 423-443. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980701450746
- De Jong, O., Van Driel, J. H., & Verloop, N. (2005). Preservice teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of using particle models in teaching chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(8), 947-964. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20078
- Fessler, R., & Christensen, J. C. (1992). The teacher career cycle: Understanding and guiding the professional development of teachers. Allyn & Bacon.
- Fessler, R., & Rice, E. (2010). Teachers career stages and professional development. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGaw (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (3rd ed., pp. 582-586). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00656-4
- Furner, C., & McCulla, N. (2019). An exploration of the influence of school context, ethos and culture on teacher career-stage professional learning. Professional Development in Education, 45(3), 505-519. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2018.1427134
- Gess-Newsome, J. (2015). A model of teacher professional knowledge and skill including PCK: Results of the thinking from the PCK Summit. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 28-42). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315735665-8
- Gess-Newsome, J., Southerland, S. A., Johnston, A., & Woodbury, S. (2003). Educational reform, personal practical theories, and dissatisfaction: The anatomy of change in college science teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 40(3), 731-767. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312040003731
- Goodwin, A. L. (2010). Globalization and the preparation of quality teachers: Rethinking knowledge domains for teaching. Teaching Education, 21(1), 19-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210903466901
- Greiman, B. C., Walker, W. D., & Birkenholz, R. J. (2005). Influence of the organizational environmental on the induction stage of teaching. Journal of Agricultural Education, 46(3), 95-106. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2005.03095
- Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. Teachers College Press.
- Gu, Q. (2017). Variations in the conditions for teachers’ professional learning and development: Teacher development, retention and renewal over a career. In M. A. Peters, B. Cowie, & I. Menter (Eds.), A companion to research in teacher education (pp. 37-52). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4075-7_3
- Huberman, A. M., Grounauer, M.-M., & Marti, J. (1993). The lives of teachers. Teachers College Press.
- Hudson, S., Hudson, P., & Miller, G. A. (2004). The measurement of service quality in the tour operating sector: A methodological comparison. Journal of Travel Research, 42(3), 305-312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287503258839
- Katz, L. G. (1972). Development stages of preschool teachers. The Elementary School Journal, 73(1), 50-54. https://doi.org/10.1086/460731
- Kennedy, A., & Clinton, C. (2009). Identifying the professional development needs of early career teachers in Scotland using nominal group technique. Teacher Development, 13(1), 29-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530902858485
- Kennedy, M. M. (2010). Attribution error and the quest for teacher quality. Educational Researcher, 39(8), 591-598. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X10390804
- Lai, I. K. W., & Lu, T.-W. (2016). How to improve the university-industry collaboration in Taiwan’s animation industry? Academic vs. industrial perspectives. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 28(6), 717-732. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2016.1141404
- Lan, J. (2001). Web-based instruction for education faculty: A needs assessment. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(4), 385-399. https://doi.org/10.1080/08886504.2001.10782323
- Lin, S.-P., Chan, Y.-H., & Tsai, M.-C. (2009). A transformation function corresponding to IPA and gap analysis. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 20(8), 829-846. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783360903128272
- Loughran, J., Berry, A., & Mulhall, P. (2012). Portraying PCK. In J. Loughran, A. Berry, & P. Mulhall (Eds.), Understanding and developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 15-23). Sense. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-821-6_3
- Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95-132). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47217-1_4
- Martilla, J. A., & James, J. C. (1977). Importance-performance analysis. Journal of Marketing, 41(1), 77-79. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224297704100112
- Oh, H. (2001). Revisiting importance-performance analysis. Tourism Management, 22(6), 617-627. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(01)00036-X
- Opfer, V. D., & Pedder, D. (2011). Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 81(3), 376-407. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311413609
- Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2013). Teaching and learning international survey (TALIS) – Teacher questionnaire. http://www.oecd.org/education/school/TALIS-2013-Teacher-questionnaire.pdf
- Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2019a). TALIS 2018 results (Volume I): Teachers and school leaders as lifelong learners. Author.
- Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2019b). TALIS 2018 data. https://www.oecd.org/education/talis/talis-2018-data.htm
- Padilla, K., Ponce-de-León, A. M., Rembado, F. M., & Garritz, A. (2008). Undergraduate professors’ pedagogical content knowledge: The case of “amount of substance”. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1389-1404. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802187033
- Paine, L., & Zeichner, K. (2012). The local and the global in reforming teaching and teacher education. Comparative Education Review, 56(4), 569-583. https://doi.org/10.1086/667769
- Park, S., & Chen, Y.-C. (2012). Mapping out the integration of the components of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): Examples from high school biology classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(7), 922-941. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21022
- Park, S., & Oliver, J. S. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualisation of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education, 38, 261-284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9049-6
- Parsons, R. D., & Brown, K. S. (2002). Teacher as reflective practitioner and action researcher. Wadsworth/Thomas Learning.
- Rial, A., Rial, J., Varela, J., & Real, E. (2008). An application of importance-performance analysis (IPA) to the management of sport centres. Managing Leisure, 13(3-4), 179-188. https://doi.org/10.1080/13606710802200878
- Robertson, S. L. (2012). Placing teachers in global governance agendas. Comparative Education Review, 56(4), 584-607. https://doi.org/10.1086/667414
- Rossett, A. (1995). Needs assessment. In G. J. Anglin (Ed.), Instructional technology: Past, present, and future (pp. 183-196). Libraries Unlimited.
- Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
- Sorensen, T. J., Lambert, M. D., & McKim, A. J. (2014). Examining oregon agriculture teachers’ professional development needs by career phase. Journal of Agricultural Education, 55(5), 140-154. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2014.05140
- Spring, J. (2008). Research on globalization and education. Review of Educational Research, 78(2), 330-363. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308317846
- Tarrant, M. A., & Smith, E. K. (2002). The use of a modified importance-performance framework to examine visitor satisfaction with attributes of outdoor recreation settings. Managing Leisure, 7(2), 69-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/13606710210137246
- van Driel, J. H., Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers’ practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 137-158. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200102)38:2<137::AID-TEA1001>3.0.CO;2-U
- Wyród-Wróbel, J., & Biesok, G. (2017). Decision making on various approaches to importance- performance analysis (IPA). European Journal of Business Science and Technology, 3(2), 123-131. https://doi.org/10.11118/ejobsat.v3i2.82