Interaction Effects of Control–Value Appraisals on Enjoyment/Boredom and Motivational Engagement
Author: Shu-Ling Peng (Center of Teacher Education, National Cheng Kung University), Biing-Lin Cherng (Institute of Education, National Cheng Kung University)
Vol.&No.:Vol. 68, No. 4
Date:December 2023
Pages:1-33
DOI:https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202312_68(4).0001
Abstract:
The academic emotion theory encompasses two main models: the control-value theory (CVT) and the cognitive motivational model. These models are used to examine the factors that precede and follow academic emotion (Pekrun et al., 2002). According to the CVT, academic emotions are closely related to how students perceive their control over learning and value achievement. When students perceive control and achievement, they experience positive emotions, such as enjoyment, hope, and pride, and their negative emotions, such as anxiety, hopelessness, or boredom, are reduced (Pekrun et al., 2002; Shao et al., 2020). The cognitive motivational model suggests that academic emotions affect learning and achievement through cognitive and motivational mechanisms, such as engagement (Pekrun et al., 2002). In summary, appraisals of control and value indirectly influence motivational engagement by shaping academic emotions.
According to the CVT, academic emotions are not simply the result of control appraisal and value appraisal added together but rather a multiplicative function of these two factors. For instance, the effect of control appraisal on positive emotions, such as enjoyment, hope, and pride, is expected to be much stronger for students who have a higher value appraisal of academic study and achievement. Control appraisal and value appraisal interact for determining achievement-related emotions. Except for a few studies (Bieg et al., 2013; Goetz et al., 2010; Putwain et al., 2018; Shao et al., 2020), research so far has focused on investigating the separate (unique) effects (i.e., additive effects), rather than the interactive effects (i.e., synergistic effects), of control-value appraisals on academic emotions, learning, and achievement among students (Nagengast et al., 2011; Trautwein et al., 2012). Additionally, few studies in Taiwan have examined whether control appraisal and value appraisal have synergistic interaction effects on motivational engagement among students through academic emotions.
In this study, we focused on two specific academic emotions: enjoyment and boredom. These emotions are frequently experienced in relation to achievement (Lüfteneggerr et al., 2016; Pekrun et al., 2002). Enjoyment is defined as a pleasant activating emotion, whereas boredom is defined as an unpleasant deactivating emotion. Both of these emotions are activity-related emotions (Pekrun, 2006). Additionally, researchers in the field of educational psychology often use motivational involvement as an external indicator of motivation. Motivational involvement refers to the learning strategies and actions adopted by students that contribute to their success in achieving learning goals (Pintrich & Schunk, 2008). Several studies have used indicators such as effort, persistence, and challenge-seeking and help-seeking behaviors to measure motivational engagement (Pintrich & Schunk, 2008). Accordingly, we integrated the CVT and the cognitive-motivational model to examine how control and value appraisal interact with the motivational engagement of students through enjoyment and boredom.
The present study has two objectives. First, to construct mediation models to investigate the relationship between control appraisal, enjoyment/boredom, and motivational engagement (i.e., the indirect effects of control appraisal→ enjoyment/boredom→ motivational engagement). Second, to explore whether these mediation relationships can be moderated by value appraisal. Two research questions guided the research: (1) Does control appraisal have indirect effects on motivational engagement through the feelings of enjoyment and boredom? (2) Does value appraisal moderate the aforementioned mediation effects?
In research question 1, we hypothesize that control appraisal exerts positive predictive effects on enjoyment and motivational engagement but has negative predictive effects on boredom. We also hypothesize that motivational engagement is positively predicted by enjoyment but is negatively predicted by boredom (research hypothesis 1-1). Furthermore, we hypothesize that enjoyment/boredom mediates the relationship between control appraisal and motivational engagement. In other words, control appraisal promotes enjoyment but reduces boredom, which in turn increases motivational engagement (research hypothesis 1-2). In research question 2, we hypothesize that value appraisal moderates the positive indirect effects of “control appraisal→ enjoyment/boredom→ motivational engagement” (research hypothesis 2).
Students from 18 seventh-grade classes in Taiwanese junior high schools were recruited in the present study. The study had a prospectivel ongitudinal design with three measurement waves to evaluate control-value appraisals, enjoyment, boredom, and motivational engagement. The first, second, and third measurements were conducted in October 2019 (T1), October 2020 (T2), and October 2021 (T3), respectively. Initially, 468 students volunteered to participate (with written parental consent) in this study. However, data from 18 participants were not included in the analyses because these participants were not present for all sessions. The final sample comprised 468 students (212 boys and 256 girls). Methodologically, three theoretical models were constructed: two mediation models and a conditional indirect effect model. These models were used to test the relationships between control-value appraisal, enjoyment/boredom, and motivational engagement. Collected data were analyzed using structural equation modeling to test both the mediation effects and conditional indirect effects. Additionally, prior achievement, prior enjoyment/boredom, prior motivational engagement, and gender were treated as control variables.
In research hypothesis 1, the observed data support two mediation models. These models suggest that control appraisal influences enjoyment/boredom, which in turn influences motivational engagement. Specifically, control appraisal positively predicts enjoyment (and negatively predicts boredom), leading to increased motivational engagement. In research hypothesis 2, value appraisal moderates the positive indirect effects of “control appraisal→ (+) enjoyment→ (+) motivational engagement” and “control appraisal→ (−) boredom→ (−) motivational engagement.” When the level of value appraisal increases, the effects of control appraisal on enjoyment/boredom and subsequently on motivational engagement increase.
Two main conclusions can be drawn from the aforementioned results. First, our results support the hypothesis that academic emotions (i.e., enjoyment and boredom) play mediating roles between control appraisal and motivational engagement. Second, our finding suggests that value appraisal moderates the aforementioned mediations. When the level of value appraisal increases, the influence of control appraisal on enjoyment/boredom and subsequently on motivational engagement increases. This result supports the interaction effects of control-value appraisals.
《Full Text》
References:
- 吳靜吉、程炳林(1992)。激勵的學習策略量表之修訂。測驗年刊,39,59-78。【Wu, J.-J., & Cherng, B.-L. (1992). A revision of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Psychological Testing, 39, 59-78.】
- 李俊青(2007)。學業情緒歷程模式之分析(未出版碩士論文)。國立成功大學。【Lee, C.-C. (2007). The analysis of academic emotions process model [Unpublished master’s thesis]. National Cheng Kung University.】
- 李俊青、程炳林(2006,10月1日)。學業情緒之控制-價值與認知-動機中介模式之分析〔研討會論文〕。台灣心理學會第45屆年會,臺北市,臺灣。【Lin, C.-C., & Cherng, B.-L. (2006, October 1). The analysis of academic emotions process model [Paper presentation]. 45th Annual Meeting of Taiwanese Psychological Association, Taipei, Taiwan.】
- 林宴瑛、程炳林(2012)。環境目標結構與控制-價值信念對學業情緒之效果。教育心理學報,44(1),49-72。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.20110711【Lin, Y.-Y., & Cherng, B.-L. (2012). The effects of environmental goal structures and control-value beliefs on academic emotions.Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 44(1), 49-72. https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.20110711】
張映芬(2021)。國中生完美主義組型暨與父母期望/苛責、學業情緒、動機涉入之關係。
教育科學研究期刊,66(1),203-230。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202103_66(1).0007【Chang, Y.-F. (2021). Perfectionism profiles and their relationship with parental expectations/criticism, achievement emotions, and motivational engagement.
Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 66(1), 203-230. https:// doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202103_66(1).0007】
» More
- 吳靜吉、程炳林(1992)。激勵的學習策略量表之修訂。測驗年刊,39,59-78。【Wu, J.-J., & Cherng, B.-L. (1992). A revision of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Psychological Testing, 39, 59-78.】
- 李俊青(2007)。學業情緒歷程模式之分析(未出版碩士論文)。國立成功大學。【Lee, C.-C. (2007). The analysis of academic emotions process model [Unpublished master’s thesis]. National Cheng Kung University.】
- 李俊青、程炳林(2006,10月1日)。學業情緒之控制-價值與認知-動機中介模式之分析〔研討會論文〕。台灣心理學會第45屆年會,臺北市,臺灣。【Lin, C.-C., & Cherng, B.-L. (2006, October 1). The analysis of academic emotions process model [Paper presentation]. 45th Annual Meeting of Taiwanese Psychological Association, Taipei, Taiwan.】
- 林宴瑛、程炳林(2012)。環境目標結構與控制-價值信念對學業情緒之效果。教育心理學報,44(1),49-72。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.20110711【Lin, Y.-Y., & Cherng, B.-L. (2012). The effects of environmental goal structures and control-value beliefs on academic emotions.Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 44(1), 49-72. https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.20110711】
- 張映芬(2021)。國中生完美主義組型暨與父母期望/苛責、學業情緒、動機涉入之關係。教育科學研究期刊,66(1),203-230。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202103_66(1).0007【Chang, Y.-F. (2021). Perfectionism profiles and their relationship with parental expectations/criticism, achievement emotions, and motivational engagement. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 66(1), 203-230. https:// doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202103_66(1).0007】
- 張映芬、程炳林(2011)。國中生動機涉入之分類建構及其相關因素探討。教育心理學報,43(2),521-546。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.20101018【Chang, Y.-F., & Cherng, B.-L. (2011). The classification and related factors of motivational engagement for junior high school students. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 43(2), 521-546. https://doi.org/10.6251/ BEP.20101018】
- 張映芬、程炳林(2017)。教師教學情緒、學生學業情緒與動機涉入之關係探究。教育心理學報,49(1),113-136。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.20161028【Chang, Y.-F., & Cherng, B.-L. (2011). The relations of teachers’ teaching emotion, students’ achievement emotion, and students’ motivational engagement for junior high school students. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 49(1), 113-136. https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.20161028】
- 教育部統計處(2019)。各縣市高級中等學校概況統計(101學年度)。https://stats.moe.gov.tw/ files/city/101/101cityh.xls【Department of statistics, MOE. (2019). Statistics of senior secondary schools (2012). https://stats.moe.gov.tw/ files/city/101/101cityh.xls】
- 陳正昌、程炳林(2002)。SPSS、SAS、BMDP統計軟體在多變量統計上的應用(第二版)。五南。【Chen, C.-C., & Cherng, B.-L. (2002). The applications of SPSS, SAS, and BMDP for multivariate statistical analysis (2nd ed.). Wu-Nan Book.】
- 彭淑玲(2021)。不同回饋操弄對台灣國中生期望—價值信念與學習表現之影響。教育心理學報,53(2),383-406。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.202112_53(2).0006【Peng, S.-L. (2021). The power of feedback manipulations: Effects on Taiwanese junior high school students’ expectancy-value beliefs and academic performance. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 53(2), 383-406. https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.202112_53(2).0006】
- 彭淑玲、程炳林(2005)。四向度課室目標結構、個人目標導向與課業求助行為之關係。師大學報:教育類,50(2),71-97。https://doi.org/10.29882/JTNUE.200510.0005【Peng, S.-L., & Cherng, B.-L. (2005). The relationship among a 4-dimensional classroom goal structure, personal goal orientation and academic help-seeking behavior. Journal of Taiwan Normal University: Education, 50(2), 71-97. https://doi.org/10.29882/JTNUE.200510.0005】
- 彭淑玲、黃博聖、陳學志(2019)。學習情境中的個人成就目標與作弊接受度之關係:以學業自我效能為調節變項。教育科學研究期刊,64(4),87-113。https://doi.org/10.6209/ JORIES.201912_64(4).0004【Peng, S.-L., Huang, P.-S., & Chen, H.-C. (2021). Personal achievement goals and the acceptability of cheating in an academic context: The moderating role of academic self-efficacy. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 64(4), 87-113. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.201912_64(4).0004】
- 程炳林(2006)。主觀能力與逃避策略之關係。師大學報:教育類,51(2),1-24。https://doi.org/ 10.29882/JTNUE.200610.0001【Cherng, B.-L. (2006). Students’ perception of subjective competence and their use of avoidance strategies. Journal of Taiwan Normal University: Education, 51(2), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.29882/JTNUE.200610.0001】
- 程炳林(2012)。國中生課業情緒的測量、發展與領域特定性(I)(NSC101-2410-H006-09)。科技部。https://ir.lib.ncku.edu. tw/handle/987654321/:127013 【Cherng, B.-L. (2012). The measurement, development, and domain specificity of junior high school students’ academic emotions (I) (NSC101-2410-H006-095). Ministry of Science and Technology. https:// ir.lib.ncku.edu.tw/handle/987654321/:127013】
- 黃豊茜、程炳林(2010,11月6-7日)。情緒調整策略對學業情緒歷程模式的調節效果〔研討會論文〕。台灣心理學會第49屆年會,嘉義市,臺灣。【Huang, L.-C., & Cherng, B.-L. (2010, November 6-7). Examination of the effect of emotion regulation strategies on academic emotions process model [Paper presentation]. 49th Annual Meeting of Taiwan Psychological Association, Chiayi, Taiwan.】
- 簡嘉菱(2020)。課業情緒交互效果模式的檢驗暨教學方案之成效分析。國立成功大學教育研究所。https://doi.org/10.6844/NCKU202000719【Chien, C.-L. (2020). The effect of academic emotions reciprocal model and teaching analysis [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. National Cheng Kung University. https://doi.org/10.6844/NCKU202000719】
- Ames, C. (1992). Classroom: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261-271. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261
- Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.
- Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514. 51.6.1173
- Barrera, A. (2001). Students’ conceptions of intelligence, emotions, and achievement in university statistics courses [Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of Munich.
- Bieg, M., Goetz, T., & Hubbard, K. (2013). Can I master it and does it matter? An intraindividual analysis on control-value antecedents of trait and state academic emotions. Learning and Individual Differences, 28, 102-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.09.006
- Boehme, K. L., Goetz, T., & Preckel, F. (2017). Is it good to value math? Investigating mother’s impact on their children’s test anxiety based on control-value theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 51, 11-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.05.002
- Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464-504. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/10705510701301834
- Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233-255. https://doi.org/10.1207/ S15328007SEM0902_5
- Custodero, L. A. (2005). Observable indicators of flow experience: A developmental perspective on musical engagement in young children from infancy to school age. Music Education Research, 7(2), 185-209. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613800500169431
- Davis, H. A., DiStefano, C., & Schutz, P. A. (2008). Identifying patterns of appraising tests in first-year college students: Implications for anxiety and emotion regulation during test taking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 942-960. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013096
- Dettmers, S., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., & Pekrun, R. (2011). Students’ emotions during homework in mathematics: Testing a theoretical model of antecedents and achievement outcomes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 25-35. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.10.001
- Eccles J. S., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., & Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motivation (pp. 75-146). W. H. Freeman.
- Feather, N. T. (1982). Expectancy-value approaches: Present status and future directions. In N. T. Feather (Ed.), Expectations and actions: Expectancy-value models in psychology (pp. 395-420). Erlbaum.
- Fu, A.-T., Ko, H.-C., Wu, J. Y.-W., Cherng, B.-L., & Cheng, C.-P. (2007). Impulsivity and expectancy in risk for alcohol use: Comparing male and female college students in Taiwan. Addictive Behaviors, 32(9), 1887-1896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.01.003
- Gladstone, J. R., Häfner, I., Turci, L., Kneiβler, H., & Muenks, K. (2018). Associations between parents and students’ motivational beliefs in mathematics and mathematical performance: The role of gender. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 54, 221-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.cedpsych.2018.06.009
- Goetz, T. (2004). Students’ emotional experiences and self-regulated learning in mathematics. Utz.
- Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Stoeger, H., & Hall, N. C. (2010). Antecedents of everyday positive emotions: An experience sampling analysis. Motivation and Emotion, 34, 49-62. https://doi.org/ 10.1026/0049-8637.38.4.149
- Goetz, T., Sticca, F., Pekrun, R., Murayama, K., & Elliot, A. J. (2016). Intraindividual relations between achievement goals and discrete achievement emotions: An experience sampling approach. Learning and Instruction, 41, 115-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.learninstruc.2015.10.007
- Hall, N. C., Sampasivam, L., Muis, K. R., & Ranellucci, J. (2016). Achievement goals and emotions: The mediational roles of perceived progress, control, and value. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(2), 313-330. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12108
- Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (2001). LISREL (Version 8.51) [Computer software]. Scientific Software International.
- Lei, H., & Cui, Y. (2016). Effects of academic emotions on achievement among Mainland Chinese Students: A meta-analysis. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 44(9), 1541-1553. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2016.44.9.1541
- Lüftenegger, M., Klug, J., Harrer, K., Langer, M., Spiel, C., & Schober, B. (2016). Students’ achievement goals, learning-related emotions and academic achievement. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00603
- Meuleman, B., & Billiet, J. (2009). A Monte Carlo sample size study: How many countries are needed for accurate multilevel SEM? Survey Research Methods, 3(1), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2009.v3i1.666
- Meyer, D. K., & Turner, J. C. (2006). Re-conceptualizing emotion and motivation to learn in classroom contexts. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 377-390. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10648-006-9032-1
- Murdock, T. B., & Anderman, E. M. (2006). Motivational perspectives on student cheating: Toward an integrated model of academic dishonesty. Educational Psychologist, 41(3), 129-145. https:// doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4103_1
- Nagengast, B., Marsh, H. W., Scalas, L. F., Xu, M. K., Hau, K.-T., & Trautwein, U. (2011). Who took the “×” out of expectancy-value theory? A psychological mystery, a substantive- methodological synergy, and a cross-national generalization. Psychological Science, 22(8), 1058-1066. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611415540
- Obergriesser, S., & Stoeger, H. (2020). Students’ emotions of enjoyment and boredom and their use of cognitive learning strategies– How do they affect one another? Learning and Instruction, 66, 101285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101285
- Pekrun, R. (2000). A social-cognitive, control-value theory of achievement emotions. In J. Heckhausen (Ed.), Motivational psychology of human development: Developing motivation and motivating development (pp. 143-163). Elsevier Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(00) 80010-2
- Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 315-341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9
- Pekrun, R., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (Eds.). (2014). International handbook of emotions in education. Routledge.
- Pekrun, R., Elliot, A. J., & Maier, M. A. (2006). Achievement goals and discrete achievement emotions: A theoretical model and prospective test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 583-597. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.3.583
- Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Daniels, L. M., Stupnisky, R. H., & Perry, R. P. (2010). Boredom in achievement setting: Exploring control-value antecedents and performance outcomes of a neglected emotion. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 531-549. https://doi.org/ 10.1037/a0019243
- Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Frenzel. A. C., Barchfeld, P., & Perry, R. P. (2011). Measuring emotions in students’ learning and performance: The achievement emotions questionnaire (AEQ). Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 36-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych. 2010.10.002
- Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 91-105. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3702_4
- Pekrun, R., Hall, N. C., Goetz, T., & Perry, R. P. (2014). Boredom and academic achievement: Testing a model of reciprocal causation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(3), 696-710. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0036006
- Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2008). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (3rd ed.). Prentice Hall.
- Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185-227. https:// doi.org/10.1080/00273170701341316
- Putwain, D. W., Becker, S., Symes, W., & Pekrun, R. (2018). Reciprocal relations between student’s academic enjoyment, boredom, and achievement over time. Learning and Instruction, 54, 73-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.08.004
- Putwain, D. W., Larkin, D., & Sander, P. (2013). A reciprocal model of achievement goals and learning related emotions in the first year of undergraduate study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(4), 361-374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.07.003
- Rubio, D. M., Berg-Weger, M., & Tebb, S. S. (2001). Using structural equation modeling to test for multidimensionality. Structural Equation Modeling, 8(4), 613-626. https://doi.org/10.1207/ S15328007SEM0804_06
- Shao, K., Pekrun, R., Marsh, H. W., & Loderer, K. (2020). Control-value appraisals, achievement emotions, and foreign language performance: A latent interaction analysis. Learning and Instruction, 69, 101356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101356
- Stockinger, K., Rinas, R., & Daumiller, M. (2021). Student adaptability, emotions, and achievement: Navigating new academic terrains in a global crisis. Learning and Individual Differences, 90, 102046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102046
- Trautwein, U., Marsh, H. W., Nagengast, B., Lüdtke, O., Nagy, G., & Jonkmann, K. (2012). Probing for the multiplicative term in modern expectancy-value theory: A latent interaction modeling study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 763-777. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027470
- Volet, S. E. (1997). Cognitive and affective variables in academic learning: The significance of direction and effort in students’ goals. Learning and Instruction, 7(3), 235-254. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S0959-4752(96)00027-8
- Watt, H. M. G. (2006). The role of motivation in gendered educational and occupational trajectories related to maths. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12(4), 305-322. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/13803610600765562
- Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68-81. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
- Wolters, C. A. (2004). Advancing achievement goal theory: Using goal structures and goal orientations to predict students’ motivation, cognition, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(2), 236-250. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.236
64 Zaccoletti, S., Altoè, G., & Mason, L. (2020). Enjoyment, anxiety, and boredom, and their control-value antecedents as predictors of reading comprehension.
Learning
and Individual Differences, 79, 101869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2020.101869